Posts by jdough

1

New 144,000 article and much, much more

by jdough in

http://www.144000.110mb.com/

New 144,000 article

by jdough in

jw
friends

http://144000.110mb.com/index.html

the new, lengthy, paper entitled why the jehovahs witnesses are wrong teaching: - that only 144,000 go to heaven; - that the great crowd of revelation 7:9 is standing on earth; - that the first resurrection began in 1918; - that resurrected man can be educated to perfection; - that jesus christ, the angel, is no longer needed after the thousand year reign and is therefore dispensed with; - and much more

can be found here:

jdough

http://144000.110mb.com/index.html The new, lengthy, paper entitled Why the Jehovah’s Witnesses are wrong teaching: - that only 144,000 go to heaven; - that the Great Crowd of Revelation 7:9 is standing on earth; - that the first resurrection began in 1918; - that resurrected man can be educated to perfection; - that Jesus Christ, the angel, is no longer needed after the thousand year reign and is therefore dispensed with; - and much more … Can be found here: http://144000.110mb.com/index.html

jerusalem 607 change of web address

by jdough in

for those interested in whether jerusalem was actually destroyed in 607 i have placed the article "why jehovah's witnesses are wrong in believing jerusalem was destroyed in 607" on a new web site.

the old web site: http://www.geocities.com/jerusalem607/

the new web site: http://www.jonathan.freehyperspace.com/

jdough

For those interested in whether Jerusalem was actually destroyed in 607 I have placed the article "Why Jehovah's Witnesses are wrong in believing Jerusalem was destroyed in 607" on a new web site. The OLD WEB SITE: http://www.geocities.com/jerusalem607/ The NEW WEB SITE: http://www.jonathan.freehyperspace.com/ The new web site can be bookmarked.

1

Jerusalem 607 change of web address notice

by jdough in

jw
friends

for those interested in whether jerusalem was actually destroyed in 607 i have placed the article "why jehovah's witnesses are wrong in believing jerusalem was destroyed in 607" on a new web site.

the old web site: http://www.geocities.com/jerusalem607/

the new web site: http://www.jonathan.freehyperspace.com/

jdough

For those interested in whether Jerusalem was actually destroyed in 607 I have placed the article "Why Jehovah's Witnesses are wrong in believing Jerusalem was destroyed in 607" on a new web site. The OLD WEB SITE: http://www.geocities.com/jerusalem607/ The NEW WEB SITE: http://www.jonathan.freehyperspace.com/ The new web site can be bookmarked.

9

Jerusalem was not Destroyed in 607 B.C.E. New Web Site

by jdough in

there is a new web site devoted to the false claim by jehovah's witnesses that jerusalem was destroyed in 607 b.c.e.

please feel free to link to the site.

http://www.geocities.com/jerusalem607/

jdough

thank you. I placed the site here also for bookmarking.

9

Jerusalem was not Destroyed in 607 B.C.E. New Web Site

by jdough in

there is a new web site devoted to the false claim by jehovah's witnesses that jerusalem was destroyed in 607 b.c.e.

please feel free to link to the site.

http://www.geocities.com/jerusalem607/

jdough

42

Another 607 / 587 BCE question, How do JW's fix the 20 years ??

by run dont walk in

ok, since all the evidence and people/scholars etc, all agree that jerusalem was destroyed in 587/586 bce and not 607 bce.

how do the jw's get the extra 20 years, i understand the 2520 years and going back from 1914. but alot of the proof goes by adding up the kings reigns, and it gets you to the 587/586 date, do jw's simply add on a few years for each king, or is their a mystery king that ruled for 20 years that only they know about.. hhhhhhmmmmmmm.

hope my question makes sense.