Hillary:
I was asking if that was what you were saying, because I didn't want to think that you would subscribe to that illogical argument. It seems you don't.
Yes I've read about the US military's less than stellar record in other parts of the world. Nevertheless, I think that to highlight a bad thing in another part of the world is merely a propaganda method, a distraction from the good thing that the US military is going to accomplish in Iraq. If you wish to talk about Colombia, or Peru, or Africa, fine. You will probably find that I agree with you when you do. But the current discussions/debates are about Iraq, not those other places.
As an aside, even if the troops quit in 1998, are you suggesting that because the US military trained the Kompassus in 1998 and not 2003 that it has no moral implication now?
I would argue that it carries a moral obligation now for the US military. They trained the Kopassus, they have an obligation to get the hell back in there and sort them out. I hope they do. As a parrallel, it has been said that America set up Saddam. In that case, America has an obligation to get rid of him. They are now fulfilling that obligation.
Expatbrit