Since it's labor-day week-end, I'm wishing everyone a very safe and enjoyable week-end.
Posts by golf2
-
4
Labor-Day Week-End, The Best
by golf2 in.
since it's labor-day week-end, i'm wishing everyone a very safe and enjoyable week-end.
golf
-
golf2
-
76
Re: My 9/11 threads ... a study in NLP ... enjoy!
by What-A-Coincidence inhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nohk8qk-ajw.
.
-
golf2
Caedes, are you listening? I said, my contention from the outset was, these inner core columns could not have collapsed uniformly and simultaneously. Is it that difficult for you to understand? FEMA said that some of the specimens of steel were "rapidly corroded by sulfidation" (FEMA 2002 Appendix C)This report is significant, because sulfidation is an effect of explosives. Fema appropriately called for further investigation of this finding, which the NEW YORK TIMES CALLED "PERHAPS THE DEEPEST MYSTERY UNCOVERED IN THE INVESTIGATION." (Killough-Miller, 2002)
Professor of Fire Protection Engineering, Dr. Jonathan Barnett, said, "fire and structural damage...would not explain steel members in the debris pile that appear to have been partly evaporated" (Glanz, 2001)
How were the buildings wired? Did you know that Marvin Bush, the brother of George was one of Securacom's company directors? Their cousin Wirt Walker 111 was the CEO (Burns, 2003) None of this info was in the evening news nor mentioned in the 911 Commission report. Scott Forbes, who worked for Fiduciary Trust, reported "On the week-end of (Sept 8-9, 2001), there was a "powder down" condition in the ...south tower. This power down condition meant there was no electrical supply for approximately 36 hours from floor 50 up...The reason given by the WTC for the powder down was that cabling in the tower was being upgraded...Of course without power there were no security cameras, no security locks on doors (while) many, many "engineers (were) coming in and out of the tower. Ben Fountain quoted in People Magazine 2001, said, "...the weeks before 9/11, the towers were evacuated " a number of times"
The ONLY source you have provided was NIST, a government funded report!!!!! You keep saying, I'm avoiding your questions, or is it, your using diversionary tactics so you will not answer my previous points. Your totally desperate and trying to save face under the guise of me not knowing my subject matter and discrediting every source I throw your way, which were many by the way, compared to your NIST report! Are you a government employee?
What gets me the most is, you discrediting Engineers and Architects, your own kind, what a laugh!!!! You will save face at all costs!!!!!!!! Your impressive in your own mind! -
76
Re: My 9/11 threads ... a study in NLP ... enjoy!
by What-A-Coincidence inhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nohk8qk-ajw.
.
-
golf2
Caedes or rather 'deep throat' you putting your foot deeper down your throat. I love the way you reply to my posts. Sooooooo, Steven Jones and David Ray Griffin, two well known men in their field are arses! Boy do have a high opinion of yourself. About your NIST as being the only true source, these men pounce on their report. Do you work for the government? The source you quote from is government funded source. I beg you to send me an independent report about the wtc. You can't, so you have to drum up your usual rhetoric. Is the NIST report the best you can offer me? You've taken the course of least resistance. For someone who claims to be an engineer your not convincing enough, I suggest you turn to politics.
My contention all along has been about the inner core columns of the wtc. No way in hell could these massive columns collapse by jet fuel uniformly and simultaneously. I've also mentioned about the antenna on the top of the roof that came down straight, why straight? Shouldn't it have toppled? How is it that no other high-rise burning building came crashing down prior to 911?
Why do I need to quote others on this subject? Hmmmmmmmmm, because as you say, I can't say it in my own words, what a laugh!
For the benefit of others, read what David Ray Griffin has to say, and THEN draw your conclusions. HTTP;//911REVIEW.COM/ARTICLES/GRIFFIN/NYC1.HTML
http://physics911.net/stevenjones -
62
** If God is love, you cannot fear him **
by FlyingHighNow inyou will find a host of books and articles that discuss the polar opposites of love and fear.
the bible shows two opposing gods.
personally, i believe god is love and the angry god of fear is an imposter.
-
golf2
I fear my CREATOR in terms of respect. I do not carry around a guilt complex, why should I?
-
111
Why do people use so many derogative, belittling terms on here like....
by reniaa inmaybe for the same reason the bible namecalls:.
sinners.
undeserving.
-
golf2
As the good LORD said, "Out of the abundance of the heart, the mouth speaks."
Belittling remarks is a sign of ignorance and immaturity. Why do people use them? Jealousy. -
40
I Still Like JWD. Do You???
by minimus ini really enjoy the posters here.
it's a bit calmer but it still works for me!
-
golf2
Without a doubt, I've been spoiled.
I should in Boston around Sept.28,29. -
76
Re: My 9/11 threads ... a study in NLP ... enjoy!
by What-A-Coincidence inhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nohk8qk-ajw.
.
-
golf2
Fellows, I'm referring to professors, engineers a architects on this subject and yet you refuse to check them out, why? Here's another professor speaking out, and it's 50 pages in length if you care to read it. Http://review.com/articles/griffin/nyc1.html Really, am I asking toooooooo much?
If you guys can't be objective about this issue, how can you be objective about other issues? I have provided many sites for everyone to view, what have you guys provided? Is this a one-sided affair? As former witnesses, did you not have material to refute householders, well, where's your refutation? What I'm beginning to see is that nobody wants to at least say, I may be wrong, instead, you give me government funded agencies who naturally support government claims. I've taken abusive and belittling comments about my occupation from people who have NO about my trade!!!! I've been blessed and honored with the people that I have worked with throughout my years.
For anyone to say to me that they will not look at videos or rely on experts who say that the wtc was rigged, and yet, accepts NIST and Fema's report, just doesn't make sense. Check out these agencies, it may surprise you. While your at it, check out FIAT money and The Federal Reserve that has deceived people since 1913!!!!! I guess that's all bullshit too!!
Please supply me information (videos,etc) from independent sources that say, the wtc collapse came about by the plane crash and the subsequent fire. Is that tooooo much to ask? -
76
Re: My 9/11 threads ... a study in NLP ... enjoy!
by What-A-Coincidence inhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nohk8qk-ajw.
.
-
golf2
Beta-male, I'm also a tree surgeon, meaning, I know how to knock things down. What's your experience? You didn't get my drift about the additional columns. Here I go again, the inner core columns were MUCH thicker than the perimeter columns. Are you trying to convince me that 47 inner columns uniformly and simultaneously collapsed together not to mention the hundreds and hundreds of other columns below where the plane crashed? I guess citing the additional columns of 240 didn't leave any lasting impression about this immense structured building that collapsed. What experience do YOU have in this field? Are you a demolition expert? Provided me with some videos to view your argument, is that asking too much?
Caedes, what crap you are spewing out, the Nist's report? Is that your best? A government funded group, yeah right.
You haven't checked out http://physics911.net/stevenjones As I've said Caedes, you are calling these top notch Engineers and Architects at http://patriotsquestion911.com/engineers.html arse's. So, your telling me that your in a better position than these Engineers and Architects to know HOW the WTC came crashing down!!!! You remind me of a scripture in the Bible that says,"For if anyone thinks he is something when he is nothing, he is deceiving his own mind." Galations 6:3 You not acknowledging the contents of above sites speaks volumes. Your still saving face. -
76
Re: My 9/11 threads ... a study in NLP ... enjoy!
by What-A-Coincidence inhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nohk8qk-ajw.
.
-
golf2
Caedes. I have repeatedly said that the inner core columns amounted to 47. The thickness of these core columns differed than the outside perimeter columns amounting to 240. So, if the inner core columns being thicker than the outer perimeter columns, then the perimeter columns should have collapsed first, but it didn't. The tower stationed on the building came straight down, how's that? What does that tell you? You need to review the collapse of the buildings, especially the tower coming straight down.
It is obvious to me that your just saving face! I will allow time to takes it course. In the meantime, why not view this video. http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/407.html
You never gave any credence to the site I suggested you view, and once more, http://patriotquestion911.com/engineers.html I guess these Engineers and Architects are speaking from their arse's! How about the other one, http://www.ae911truth.org/
This topic is down my alley. Keep discrediting me, its wood in the fire for me. -
30
Breaking: Mother is going back to the Watchtower
by What-A-Coincidence ineven though she knows it's hypocritical.
she felt 'loved' there.
she misses that.
-
golf2
My mom is 94 and stills attend meetings. When she really needed help, no one was there for her. She goes to the meetings only for Jah.