Cedars,
Pithy you are not.
Farkel
http://jwsurvey.org/governing-body-2/new-light-watchtower-magazine-leaked-from-organization-weeks-ahead-of-general-release.
if doctrinal explanations are missing from the article, it is because they are also missing from the magazine.. i would like to give my thanks again to my source for supplying me with the magazine article weeks ahead of its scheduled release.
it showed remarkable courage, because risks were taken.
Cedars,
Pithy you are not.
Farkel
with cedars release of leaked watchtower new light "adjusting" understanding of "who" the faithful and discreet slave is.....i am struck by something which similarly struck me back in 1967.in 1967 i had just been imprisoned.
being a male jehovah's witness during the viet nam war meant certain "issues" arose affecting a decision to respond to the military draft.i have told the story before.
but, i'd like go at it from another angle in view of the above mentioned new light about the fds fora different reason.it was first in 1967 i began to discover that there are two watchtower societies.let me explain why i say this and for what reasons.first of all, anybody standing in a kingdom hall or sitting in a seat at a vast international assembly saw people they would identify as all on the same page.
Howdy Terry,
:I'd spoken previously of my interview with the F.B.I. and my hearing before the Draft Board. I was on the brink--as it were--of what came next.
Yep. Been there. Done that. As you well know.
:SIDEBAR: Once a month the inmates received an official visit from outside the prison by a kind of Circuit Servant. His name was Bourgeosie (Booj-swah).
Circuit Servant...Bourgeosie...hmmm. Isn't that a bit redundant? :)
Ray Franz summed up all that "no alternative military" bullshit in COC. He asked the perfectly logical question Freddie Franz had hoped no one would ever ask when he came up with his insanity on that issue: how is accepting the military's option to serve in an alternative to military service a "compromise" of "Christian Integrity(tm)" and accepting a sentence by a Federal Judge to do the same alternative to military service NOT a "compromise" of "Christian Integrity"?
If alternative military service is so bad and wrong by the almighty Watchtower God "Jehovah", then why is it NOT bad if a judge says to do it, but it IS so bad and wrong if the military says to do it? You did hard time. I did soft time because my sentence came about a year or so after yours and times had changed. Almost two dozen years later "Jehovah" changed His mind and basically, said all that shit we went through was because of WTS bullshit. To put it bluntly, "Jehovah" said his one and only true spokesmen on earth were not only bullshitters but shameless liars. But it was far more serious for you and I than just mere bullshit. In the meantime, the WTS sold books. Lots of books. By the way (you already know this) for the sake of newer readers, when I questioned my mom why I had to sacrifice two long years of my young life for Freddie's insanity on alternative military service, she said, "well, maybe Jehovah was testing you." I replied to her, "So Jehovah let a religious group 'test' me by forcing me to conform to a false belief?" Here was her answer: . Farkelas most suspected, the wts filed their brief, at least it looks that way..... http://appellatecases.courtinfo.ca.gov/search/case/dockets.cfm?dist=1&doc_id=2025979&doc_no=a136641.
it also notes aob in excess of word count limit.. wonder if they did that to buy more time?.
DNcall,
You wrote:
: Whereas the CA Supreme Court would likely review the case, it's less likely that the U.S. Supreme Court would review this particular case. This is because it may not find a constitutional issue within the case.
Yes. In case some people don't know or forgot, the U.S. Supreme Court only deals with cases within the purview of the jurisdiction of the Federal Government's powers allowed by the US Constitution. Any and all other cases are reserved to be appealed only to the highest Courts of each State.
It's clearly stated in the 10th amendment of the Bill of Rights. I doubt Candace's case would ever be able to reach the Federal level and if someone thinks it might, I would love to see evidence of the power of the Federal Government to intervene in a State's sovereignty in this matter.
David_10:
: I said in another thread that the Society has something up their sleeve, and, believe me, they do. It's going to be emotionally draining, to say the least, for Candace and her family. Already, everyone's on edge and nerves are raw and it's going to get worse.
Doubtful. It is nearly impossible that Candace will ever have to testify again. Her only stress will be in the waiting for this to be resolved. She already made it clear she doesn't care much about the money. She has already won because she has dragged the WTS into the sewer where they swim anyway.
It is only going to be emotionally draining for the WTS because ALL they care about...is the money.
Farkel
"when a person does what he always does, he will get what he always gets.".
wise words, those.
i have discovered after six-and-a-half decades that those who say they have found the truth, the way, the path for themselves and for all mankind, they are full of shit.
Night Owl,
: Whatever.
I'm writing that down in my little book of outstanding repartees, because I recognize intellectual brilliance when I see it.
Farkel
"when a person does what he always does, he will get what he always gets.".
wise words, those.
i have discovered after six-and-a-half decades that those who say they have found the truth, the way, the path for themselves and for all mankind, they are full of shit.
Marvin Schilmer,
: Keep kickin ass brother!
My feet hurt! Too many asses, too little time and energy!
Sigh.
Farkel
for example, they pride themselves in what they don't believe such as immortal souls, the trinity, hellfire, etc.. some exjws still believe it is the "truth" and support the basics.. .
:Do You Believe In ANYTHING That The Witnesses Taught At This Point In Your Life?
Absolutely. I believe that "Religion is a Snare and a Racket" and they never actually said this but "Religions who are nothing more than fronts for buying and selling their never-ending supply of new books are an ever worse Snare and a Racket."
Religions that force people to buy and sell their books and then claim to be the only ones who speak for God are not just a "Snare and a Racket", they are consummate assholes.
But that's just me.
Farkel
do you hold god accountable for the corruption of the borg?
i've noticed there seems to be a bitterness, by some, that includes "god" in the equation, when discussing the borg and their policies, the governing body, elders actions, etc.
do the borg's transgressions originate with god, or does he feel the same disgust as we do?
:Do you blame Jehovah, Yahweh, God, Jesus, etc. for the corruption of the borg?
No. But then again, I don't blame the Good Tooth Fairy for cavities, either.
Farkel
i was contemplating this verse this morning... what did james mean by "works"?
and it hit me like a bolt of lightning.. now, wts would have us believe these "works" are preaching and meetings.
however, could that be what james was referring to?
Some of you folks just don't get it, so may I please ask a simple question:
Where in the Bible can it be deduced that "works" equals selling books and recruiting new book selling people and not much of anything else except going to training sessions every week where you are taught to sell books more effectively?
Farkel, Patiently Waiting CLASS
deuteronomy 14:21new international version (niv).
21 do not eat anything you find already dead.
you may give it to the foreigner residing in any of your towns, and they may eat it, or you may sell it to any other foreigner.. .
What I don't get (and maybe someone can help me out here), is that the ancient Israelites (and their supposed God) had SUCH a reverence for blood in DEAD things, but had NO reverence for spilling the blood from LIVING humans. They were most intent on wiping out and spilling the blood from entire cultures who lived and worked on the land for generations before they came to pillage and conquer.
"Reverance for blood?" Pfloooooot!
Consume it? NO! Spill it? YES, yes YES!
Idiots. (And their little dog Jehovo, too!)
Farkel
found this on youtube fyi.
.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cw8yu-r8g-8.
minister amos,
You said:
: If you've got the money, I'm sure you could find someone to do it for you. I really could not recommend it however.
I saw your hair in your icon. If you've got the money, I'm aure you could find someone to do it for you. I really could not recommend it, however.
Twit.
Farkel