well was driving most of the day. ate healthy though. got in 30 minute walk....never give up..never give up , never give up
chrisjoel
JoinedPosts by chrisjoel
-
105
Exercise Check-In Log
by White Dove inafter loubelle's exercise thread, i thought it would be a fun idea to keep a log here and check in with everyone.. i walked 30 minutes yesterday plus after walked to the police station and the witch store about 3 miles away from the y.. food: .
breakfast: 2 pieces of toast: one with pb and the other with honey, coffee.
lunch: hardboiled egg, ham, cheese stick.
-
-
-
32
Portugal 2 Germany 3
by Peppermint inwell that was a shock, those germans hey, always come through.
whose your money on now?
i would like to see turkey do well, they play with a lot of heart.
-
-
chrisjoel
Here is Hoping Russia wins .
-
105
What do you know about 'CHEMTRAILS'?
by Gill inwhat do you know about chemtrails?.
i understand these are toxic chemical trails left by aeroplanes that are sent up by the governments and not the same as the water vapour contrails.
some believe that in the long run our governments may be intent on ridding the earth of the majority of us by using poison gases or infectious diseases and are getting used to leaving these unusual trails inthe sky.......but i've wondered what they are for a long time and the uk govt has already admitted dropping pesticides on at least one part of the uk as an experiment on the people.. i have googled and u tubed a bit on this concerning information but want to know if there is something to worry about or not?.
-
-
chrisjoel
I'll let you guys in on a little secret. I used to believe this stuff. I bought it all hook, line, and sinker. Then I developed critical thinking skills. They kept saying "look into it, look at the proof!" So I did. There is no proof. Conjecture, crackpots who have been abducted by UFOs and claim to know all about the lizard people and UN conspiracies, Freemasons ruling the world, CIA mind control, trilateral commission, fake moon landing... bla bla bla. I've got news... it's all bullshit. Your efforts to convince me remind me exactly of what I was doing about 10-12 years ago. I finally realized that I was full of crap and believing people who had no credibility whatsoever.
Jstalin, respect u for stickin to your guns,
Im just a little fish in a big pond. Sometimes where there's smoke there is fire. Other times its smoke n mirrors.
Maybe its because I dont trust "anyone" that I try to give SOME ppl the benefit of the doubt when it comes to such things. Obviously crackpots abound. ..far and wide. For example on the subject of UFO's. I dont know a F***ing thing about UFOs. Ive never seen one. But the subject is so intresting that since i work at an airport with former servicemen and pilots anytime I ever got a chance to, I asked pilots, if they ever saw anything strange in the sky. Most of the time pilots having flown thousands of hours said just metorites but occasionally Yes someone would say yeah Ive seen very strange lights I couldnt account for. So what can I say the subject is intresting and so I come to find out there are a ton of ex military officials that want to bring the subject out in the open for discussion. Who the hell am i to argue with former astronauts, chiefs of staff, and generals, politicians. who want to discuss this stuff.
I came to find out that a UK guy, i think his name is Nick Pope, was the individual actually responsible in UK government for investigating such things. HE -not me- he said of all the investigations his office carried out 93% were successfully explained but 7% defied explanation. Now i just read the stinkin report. How the hell should I know. BUT i like to keep an open mind based on that 7% that defied explanation and why the hell not THAT guy does. If that guy had said 100% were explainable I would have said OK cool ...but he knows better that I do. Now if I was arrogant I would say 100% of UFOs are explainable and anyone believing otherwise is just fooling themselves. Well Im agnostic but how the hell should I know if GOD actually exists. Beats the fuck outta me. So why should I say UFOs are completely bunk. I cant. I cant be that dogmatic because I just dont know for sure.
I guess all Im saying is I go to work and have my life and dont worry about all the "crazy" stuff out there, but just cause I dont know about it doesnt mean it doesnt exist. Thats all. Im out.
-
105
What do you know about 'CHEMTRAILS'?
by Gill inwhat do you know about chemtrails?.
i understand these are toxic chemical trails left by aeroplanes that are sent up by the governments and not the same as the water vapour contrails.
some believe that in the long run our governments may be intent on ridding the earth of the majority of us by using poison gases or infectious diseases and are getting used to leaving these unusual trails inthe sky.......but i've wondered what they are for a long time and the uk govt has already admitted dropping pesticides on at least one part of the uk as an experiment on the people.. i have googled and u tubed a bit on this concerning information but want to know if there is something to worry about or not?.
-
-
chrisjoel
are you kidding me? JUST CAUSE YOU DONT KNOW ABOUT IT DOESNT MEAN IT S NOT HAPPENING DOES IT?
http://blog.wired.com/wiredscience/2008/06/should-governme.html
-
105
What do you know about 'CHEMTRAILS'?
by Gill inwhat do you know about chemtrails?.
i understand these are toxic chemical trails left by aeroplanes that are sent up by the governments and not the same as the water vapour contrails.
some believe that in the long run our governments may be intent on ridding the earth of the majority of us by using poison gases or infectious diseases and are getting used to leaving these unusual trails inthe sky.......but i've wondered what they are for a long time and the uk govt has already admitted dropping pesticides on at least one part of the uk as an experiment on the people.. i have googled and u tubed a bit on this concerning information but want to know if there is something to worry about or not?.
-
-
chrisjoel
CHEW ON THIS ....
-
105
What do you know about 'CHEMTRAILS'?
by Gill inwhat do you know about chemtrails?.
i understand these are toxic chemical trails left by aeroplanes that are sent up by the governments and not the same as the water vapour contrails.
some believe that in the long run our governments may be intent on ridding the earth of the majority of us by using poison gases or infectious diseases and are getting used to leaving these unusual trails inthe sky.......but i've wondered what they are for a long time and the uk govt has already admitted dropping pesticides on at least one part of the uk as an experiment on the people.. i have googled and u tubed a bit on this concerning information but want to know if there is something to worry about or not?.
-
-
chrisjoel
Chemtrail overview
-
105
What do you know about 'CHEMTRAILS'?
by Gill inwhat do you know about chemtrails?.
i understand these are toxic chemical trails left by aeroplanes that are sent up by the governments and not the same as the water vapour contrails.
some believe that in the long run our governments may be intent on ridding the earth of the majority of us by using poison gases or infectious diseases and are getting used to leaving these unusual trails inthe sky.......but i've wondered what they are for a long time and the uk govt has already admitted dropping pesticides on at least one part of the uk as an experiment on the people.. i have googled and u tubed a bit on this concerning information but want to know if there is something to worry about or not?.
-
-
chrisjoel
OH..did U say you wanted a scientist/or bonafide papers ?
THIS Canadian atmospheric scientist warns that chemtrails, airliners and shuttle launches are weakening the stratosphere and destroying Earth’s ozone layer—threatening all life on Earth.
Ken Caldeira
Department of Global Ecology
Carnegie Institution of Washington
260 Panama St.
Stanford, CA 94305
phone: (650) 704-7212
email: [email protected]
http://globalecology.stanford.edu/DGE/CIWDGE/labs/caldeiralab/
http://www.thelastoutpost.com/site/1471/default.aspxAlso,
IN 2002 Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) had introduced a bill called the “Space Preservation Act of 2001,” also known as HR 2977, in the House of Representatives in October. The original bill would have banned chemtrails and mind control weapons in space, including “psychotronic” devices “directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of…mood management, or mind control.” We noted that the introduction of such a bill suggests that the U.S. military has already developed classified mood and mind control weapons (or are planning to do so) and that chemtrails are real.
The earlier bill prohibited “exotic weapons systems,” defined as “weapons designed to damage space or natural ecosystems (such as the ionosphere and upper atmosphere) or climate, weather, and tectonic systems with the purpose of inducing damage or destruction upon a target population or region on earth or in space.” The bill may have received a poor initial reaction from the House, because it has now been rewritten and is called HR 3616, “Space Preservation Act of 2002.” The new bill was introduced January 23. The main difference between HR 2977 and HR 3616 is that the new bill eliminates all mention of chemtrails, ELF and mind control. Kucinich explains his new bill by saying, “We signed the ABM treaty nearly 30 years ago; which requires a reduction in strategic arms, nuclear disarmament and general and complete disarmament. Weaponization of space clearly violates that treaty. My bill will call for an immediate and permanent termination of research, testing, manufacturing, production and deployment of all space-based weapons systems and components by any person, agency or contractor of the U.S. government .”
It’s expected there will be a lot of opposition to this bill, since if the Senate passed a version of it as well, it would mean the end of the end of the “Star Wars” space-based defense system, which is being heavily promoted by this administration.
The text of the new bill is below: Space Preservation Act of 2002 (Introduced in the House) HR 3616 IH 107th CONGRESS 2nd Session H.R. 3616 To preserve the cooperative, peaceful uses of space for the benefit of all humankind by prohibiting the basing of weapons in space and the use of weapons to destroy or damage objects in space that are in orbit, and for other purposes. IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES January 23, 2002 Mr. KUCINICH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Science, and in addition to the Committees on Armed Services, and International Relations, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned A BILL To preserve the cooperative, peaceful uses of space for the benefit of all humankind by prohibiting the basing of weapons in space and the use of weapons to destroy or damage objects in space that are in orbit, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the 'Space Preservation Act of 2002'. SEC. 2. REAFFIRMATION OF POLICY ON THE PRESERVATION OF PEACE IN SPACE. Congress reaffirms the policy expressed in section 102(a) of the National Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958 (42 U.S.C. 2451(a)), stating that it `is the policy of the United States that activities in space should be devoted to peaceful purposes for the benefit of all mankind.'. SEC. 3. BAN ON BASING OF WEAPONS IN SPACE AND THE USE OF WEAPONS AGAINST OBJECTS IN SPACE IN ORBIT. The President shall-- (1) implement a ban on space-based weapons of the United States and the use of weapons of the United States to destroy or damage objects in space that are in orbit; and (2) immediately order the termination of research and development, testing, manufacturing, production, and deployment of all space-based weapons of the United States. SEC. 4. INTERNATIONAL TREATY BANNING SPACE-BASED WEAPONS AND THE USE OF WEAPONS AGAINST OBJECTS IN SPACE IN ORBIT. The President shall direct the United States representatives to the United Nations and other international organizations to immediately work toward negotiating, adopting, and implementing an international treaty banning space-based weapons and the use of weapons to destroy or damage objects in space that are in orbit. SEC. 5. REPORT. The President shall submit to Congress not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and every 6 months thereafter, a report on-- (1) the implementation of the ban on space-based weapons and the use of weapons to destroy or damage objects in space that are in orbit required by section 3; and (2) progress toward negotiating, adopting, and implementing the treaty described in section 4. SEC. 6. SPACE-BASED NONWEAPONS ACTIVITIES. Nothing in this Act may be construed as prohibiting the use of funds for-- (1) space exploration; (2) space research and development; (3) testing, manufacturing, or production that is not related to space-based weapons or systems; or (4) civil, commercial, or defense activities (including communications, navigation, surveillance, reconnaissance, early warning, or remote sensing) that are not related to space-based weapons or systems. SEC. 7. DEFINITIONS. In this Act: (1) The term 'space' means all space extending upward from an altitude greater than 60 kilometers above the surface of the earth and any celestial body in such space. (2) The terms `space-based weapon' and `space-based system' mean a device capable of damaging or destroying an object or person (whether in outer space, in the atmosphere, or on earth) by-- (A) firing one or more projectiles to collide with that object or person; (B) detonating one or more explosive devices in close proximity to that object or person; (C) directing a source of energy against that object or person; or (D) any other undeveloped means. -
122
Tossed out of the District Convention! What did I do wrong? I exist!!
by Terry inthis is a stupid story if it is a story at all..... quentin and i decided we'd go to the district convention since it is right here in our home town.. why?.
oh, curiousity.
a desire to find my old prison buddies.
-
-
chrisjoel
a number of us came out of the same kh many years ago
Oh really? How many left and all at the same time? Who what where when how ?
-
105
What do you know about 'CHEMTRAILS'?
by Gill inwhat do you know about chemtrails?.
i understand these are toxic chemical trails left by aeroplanes that are sent up by the governments and not the same as the water vapour contrails.
some believe that in the long run our governments may be intent on ridding the earth of the majority of us by using poison gases or infectious diseases and are getting used to leaving these unusual trails inthe sky.......but i've wondered what they are for a long time and the uk govt has already admitted dropping pesticides on at least one part of the uk as an experiment on the people.. i have googled and u tubed a bit on this concerning information but want to know if there is something to worry about or not?.
-
-
chrisjoel
JSTALIN..your killing me lmao....ok , what about this one comment on THIS one:
-
105
What do you know about 'CHEMTRAILS'?
by Gill inwhat do you know about chemtrails?.
i understand these are toxic chemical trails left by aeroplanes that are sent up by the governments and not the same as the water vapour contrails.
some believe that in the long run our governments may be intent on ridding the earth of the majority of us by using poison gases or infectious diseases and are getting used to leaving these unusual trails inthe sky.......but i've wondered what they are for a long time and the uk govt has already admitted dropping pesticides on at least one part of the uk as an experiment on the people.. i have googled and u tubed a bit on this concerning information but want to know if there is something to worry about or not?.
-
-
chrisjoel
Yes..its always the little guys that do research into these areas ..but sometimes they have intresting things they dig up...like PROJECT STORMFURY.
www.jerryesmith.com/..investigation into weather modification, touching on such topics as HAARP, contrails, chemtrails, and global warming. There is a long history of weather modification-- attempts to induce artificial rain date back to 1880. During the Viet Nam war era, the US military's Project Popeye used cloud seeding over four Asian countries in order to disturb weather patterns, he reported.
Project Stormfury was used to redirect and weaken hurricanes for a twenty-year period starting in the 1960s, said Smith, who added that China and especially Russia have advanced weather modification methods. He speculated that Saddam Hussein may have paid Russia to brew up the severe sandstorm that took place at the beginning of Gulf War II.
The issue of chemtrails has become confused with persistent contrails, Smith commented. While such contrails may not be deliberate, they nonetheless are an environmental disaster, associated with both global warming and global dimming, he said. The spraying of chemtrails by scientific and military agencies could be considered a kind of "geo-engineering," and one purpose may be an attempt to mitigate global warming, he stated. Project HAARP, which alters the ionosphere, can be employed for military advantages, such as creating fog or cloud cover during an invasion,
http://www.carnicom.com/
http://www.seektress.com/carnfnd.htm
http://www.earthpulse.com/ Dr. Nick Begich
http://http://www.stevequayle.com/