please note that when you tell me of the corrections i need to make that this is a simplfied, minimalist presentation dealing with the society's appointment in 1919.. it is available as a powerpoint show: http://www.jwstudies.com/appointed_in_1919.ppsx .
and as a pdf: http://www.jwstudies.com/appointed_in_1919.pdf.
doug.
I used to wonder why the day-for-a-year rule (Numbers 14:34, Ezekiel 4:6) which the WTS used for its 1914 calculation did not apply to the prophecies in Daniel 7 and 12, and Revelation 11-13, but did apply to Daniel 4.
In other words, why 1260 days and not 1260 years?
Just one of the many inconsistencies that left me scratching my head and looking for the nearest exit.
Good presentation.
Sylvia
http://www.icr.org/article/9325/.
amazing read...go on , have a laugh if you want to.. new dna study confirms noah.
by brian thomas, m.s.
I haven't thoroughly examined the evidence for evolution, but I've read several books and articles about the subject.
What gets me is the assertion that such and such happened millions of years ago.
Why such a long period of time?
On the other hand, the Bible presents information to the contrary, AND answers the all-important question that evolution cannot: Whence evil?
Sylvia
http://www.icr.org/article/9325/.
amazing read...go on , have a laugh if you want to.. new dna study confirms noah.
by brian thomas, m.s.
http://www.icr.org/article/9325/.
amazing read...go on , have a laugh if you want to.. new dna study confirms noah.
by brian thomas, m.s.
I'm a believer in the Bible's account of Creation.
And as Forrest Gump would say, that's all I have to say about that.
Thanks.
Sylvia
http://www.icr.org/article/9325/.
amazing read...go on , have a laugh if you want to.. new dna study confirms noah.
by brian thomas, m.s.
I stated at the outset that I've read so many that I can't recall.
I'm 62 years old; I've been out of school 45 years.
I vaguely remember reading an article by Neil deGrasse Tyson and being disappointed that he doesn't believe in Creation.
That's all I can recall for now.
Sir, I really don't care what you think of me, ok?
Sylvia
http://www.icr.org/article/9325/.
amazing read...go on , have a laugh if you want to.. new dna study confirms noah.
by brian thomas, m.s.
Sorry about that, Sir.
I'm an avid reader, I'm widely read on a number of subjects, evolution included.
Make of that whatever you wish.
Sylvia
http://www.icr.org/article/9325/.
amazing read...go on , have a laugh if you want to.. new dna study confirms noah.
by brian thomas, m.s.
I can no more convince you that I've read books on evolution than you can convince me on the "scientific" evidence for such.
Therefore, back to the question: What errors can be found in Mr./Dr. Jeanson's research?
Sylvia
http://www.icr.org/article/9325/.
amazing read...go on , have a laugh if you want to.. new dna study confirms noah.
by brian thomas, m.s.
That shows, Sir, what I thought of them.
Sylvia
http://www.icr.org/article/9325/.
amazing read...go on , have a laugh if you want to.. new dna study confirms noah.
by brian thomas, m.s.
Uh uh.
I'm not lying; I have read many books about evolution.
I've just not bought into the anti-Creation hype.
Once again, where is Mr. Jeanson in error?
Sylvia
http://www.icr.org/article/9325/.
amazing read...go on , have a laugh if you want to.. new dna study confirms noah.
by brian thomas, m.s.
I've read so many that I can't remember which ones.
I'm always wary whenever anything is stated "with certainty."
Tee hee hee.
Sylvia
