snowbird

Joined

• started 755 topics
• posted 23,055 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by snowbird

• 
  24

  The Watchtower's method to show that it was appointed in 1919 CE

  by Doug Mason in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  please note that when you tell me of the corrections i need to make that this is a simplfied, minimalist presentation dealing with the society's appointment in 1919.. it is available as a powerpoint show: http://www.jwstudies.com/appointed_in_1919.ppsx .

  and as a pdf: http://www.jwstudies.com/appointed_in_1919.pdf.

  doug.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  snowbird

  This is so fascinating.

  Thanks

  Sylvia
  
• 
  24

  The Watchtower's method to show that it was appointed in 1919 CE

  by Doug Mason in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  please note that when you tell me of the corrections i need to make that this is a simplfied, minimalist presentation dealing with the society's appointment in 1919.. it is available as a powerpoint show: http://www.jwstudies.com/appointed_in_1919.ppsx .

  and as a pdf: http://www.jwstudies.com/appointed_in_1919.pdf.

  doug.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  snowbird

  I used to wonder why the day-for-a-year rule (Numbers 14:34, Ezekiel 4:6) which the WTS used for its 1914 calculation did not apply to the prophecies in Daniel 7 and 12, and Revelation 11-13, but did apply to Daniel 4.

  In other words, why 1260 days and not 1260 years?

  Just one of the many inconsistencies that left me scratching my head and looking for the nearest exit.

  Good presentation.

  Sylvia
  
• 
  90

  New DNA Study Confirms Noah

  by notsurewheretogo in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  http://www.icr.org/article/9325/.

  amazing read...go on , have a laugh if you want to.. new dna study confirms noah.

  by brian thomas, m.s.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  snowbird

  I haven't thoroughly examined the evidence for evolution, but I've read several books and articles about the subject.

  What gets me is the assertion that such and such happened millions of years ago.

  Why such a long period of time?

  On the other hand, the Bible presents information to the contrary, AND answers the all-important question that evolution cannot: Whence evil?

  Sylvia
  
• 
  90

  New DNA Study Confirms Noah

  by notsurewheretogo in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  http://www.icr.org/article/9325/.

  amazing read...go on , have a laugh if you want to.. new dna study confirms noah.

  by brian thomas, m.s.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  snowbird

  
  

  
  
  
• 
  90

  New DNA Study Confirms Noah

  by notsurewheretogo in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  http://www.icr.org/article/9325/.

  amazing read...go on , have a laugh if you want to.. new dna study confirms noah.

  by brian thomas, m.s.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  snowbird

  I'm a believer in the Bible's account of Creation.

  And as Forrest Gump would say, that's all I have to say about that.

  Thanks.

  Sylvia
  
• 
  90

  New DNA Study Confirms Noah

  by notsurewheretogo in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  http://www.icr.org/article/9325/.

  amazing read...go on , have a laugh if you want to.. new dna study confirms noah.

  by brian thomas, m.s.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  snowbird

  I stated at the outset that I've read so many that I can't recall.

  I'm 62 years old; I've been out of school 45 years.

  I vaguely remember reading an article by Neil deGrasse Tyson and being disappointed that he doesn't believe in Creation.

  That's all I can recall for now.

  Sir, I really don't care what you think of me, ok?

  Sylvia
  
• 
  90

  New DNA Study Confirms Noah

  by notsurewheretogo in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  http://www.icr.org/article/9325/.

  amazing read...go on , have a laugh if you want to.. new dna study confirms noah.

  by brian thomas, m.s.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  snowbird

  Sorry about that, Sir.

  I'm an avid reader, I'm widely read on a number of subjects, evolution included.

  Make of that whatever you wish.

  Sylvia
  
• 
  90

  New DNA Study Confirms Noah

  by notsurewheretogo in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  http://www.icr.org/article/9325/.

  amazing read...go on , have a laugh if you want to.. new dna study confirms noah.

  by brian thomas, m.s.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  snowbird

  I can no more convince you that I've read books on evolution than you can convince me on the "scientific" evidence for such.

  Therefore, back to the question: What errors can be found in Mr./Dr. Jeanson's research?

  Sylvia
  
• 
  90

  New DNA Study Confirms Noah

  by notsurewheretogo in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  http://www.icr.org/article/9325/.

  amazing read...go on , have a laugh if you want to.. new dna study confirms noah.

  by brian thomas, m.s.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  snowbird

  That shows, Sir, what I thought of them.

  Sylvia
  
• 
  90

  New DNA Study Confirms Noah

  by notsurewheretogo in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  http://www.icr.org/article/9325/.

  amazing read...go on , have a laugh if you want to.. new dna study confirms noah.

  by brian thomas, m.s.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  snowbird

  Uh uh.

  I'm not lying; I have read many books about evolution.

  I've just not bought into the anti-Creation hype.

  Once again, where is Mr. Jeanson in error?
  

  Sylvia