Yeah, thanks for sharing, Farkel.
Tell us more whenever you've a mind to, please.
part 1 - my parents.
it's a funny thing, time.
notwithstanding einstein's relativity, time means vastly different things throughout life.
Yeah, thanks for sharing, Farkel.
Tell us more whenever you've a mind to, please.
i've already written "my story".
i've been "out" for 35 years.
but that is not a story that contains the little stuff.
Yes, absolutely!
this was great!!!.
.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7svcidltyjy.
Made my day, thanks.
lalliv01
provenance: the history of ownership of a work of art; the copy history of a piece of data, or the intermediate pieces of data utilized to compute a final data element.
a chain of custody, ownership and certificate of authenticity.
there was once a greek fellow we call euclid.
I read and enjoy your posts, Terry. I like to witness a good, honest debate whence good information
can be derived from. In order to evince more info out of you one has to challange your argument. It's
difficult to argue against reaon and logic, and faith VS. reason and logic make very poor debating
contestants. If you don't have faith you'll never believe, you know, when "you walk by faith", etc.
People of faith can prove nothing about their faith for if they did, it would not be faith anymore, it would
be fact.
To believe the Bible is "the" word of God one must abandon reality and just have "true faith."
Or the Kuran, the Book of Mormon, etc.. People are literally blowing themselves up because of
and in the name of their faith. You cannot convince them, they will never convince you. I
believe reality exists, but a question for you: does faith, as in "walk by faith" alone, exist in your life?
Thanks and keep posting.
i recently watched this swedish film and i was very impressed.
it's a murdery mystery/thriller for a mature audience.. .
david fincher is going to direct an english-language remake starring daniel craig.
I watched the movie on DVD, kept me keenly interested till the end.
One thing: I personally could not bring myself to watch that movie
in the presence of my children, even though they are grown and married.
But that's just me; Just a warning.
anyone remember that?
i learned to read on that book.there were some very disturbing images,like the earth opening up and people falling into it.like upside down ladies and hippies.id love to get a hold of one and peruse it with a friend and some herbal medicine.maybe there is one in the attic?anyway,that and the image of the snake talking to the beautiful,bare shouldered eve,who was holding an apple,made a big impression on me.any else have any faves from that book?is it still being used?.
I think that book was published as an aid to help people,
like Southeast Asians, understand the Bible's content from
Genesis to Revelation.
love is spoken of as though it were an actual.....thing.. the discourse surrounding "love" is a dishonest framing of an argument based on a non-context.. .
love is an emotion.
it is the strongest possible positive emotion.. where does it come from?.
Life itself is the source of all other values. Without life their can be no value.
So, if "love" enhances my life, makes me happy- promotes my life- do I then
"know" love? Might be true but it seems like a cold calculation, a cold ruler
to measure with.
"i am the mother, and i am the daughter.
i am the wife and i am the whore.
".
"Finally, by locating the divine in the "voice" and "hearing" of the text, it leads its hearers or readers to find the divine within the text and within themselves, and so to discover themselves within the divine. In such an interpretive movement of letting go and finding, of becoming sober and being found, the text's final words suggest, the reader "goes up" to the salvific "place of rest," "finds" the divine persona revealed in the text, and "enters into" a state of living and not dying again. "
Recovering, this quote is what prompted me to believe it might be the "reader",
but I admit, I can't understand what the writer had in mind when he wrote it. that
said, I don't yet know what Terry has in mind and why he thinks what he thinks. Terry?
"i am the mother, and i am the daughter.
i am the wife and i am the whore.
".
From what I've read, I gather that it is the reader
and the listener who end up being the speaker in
this riddle (poem).
"i am the mother, and i am the daughter.
i am the wife and i am the whore.
".
The Nag Hammadi, I read it, still don't know.
WHO?