Dear Doug: You have invested a lot of time in order to explain me your argument. I appreciate that... But with a lot of respect I think you get to a point where you can't see the wood for the trees. I mean you are loosing the big true for little details. So, from your point of view if the WTS does not have the True where is that?? Sincerly Danny
dannywarm
JoinedPosts by dannywarm
-
10
How 539 BCE is calculated
by Doug Mason inthe wts accepts the date 539 bce for the fall of babylon.
but they do not accept the absolute date that is used to calculate the date of the fall.. here is a picture that illustrates the wtss problem.. http://au.geocities.com/doug_mason1940/why_historians_know_babylon_fell_in_539_bce.pdf.
if you have difficulties with the colours i use in my drawings and my colour combinations, i apologise.
-
-
-
10
How 539 BCE is calculated
by Doug Mason inthe wts accepts the date 539 bce for the fall of babylon.
but they do not accept the absolute date that is used to calculate the date of the fall.. here is a picture that illustrates the wtss problem.. http://au.geocities.com/doug_mason1940/why_historians_know_babylon_fell_in_539_bce.pdf.
if you have difficulties with the colours i use in my drawings and my colour combinations, i apologise.
-
-