thanks darkspilver
I guess that makes sense.....
I was pretty sure it didn't mean 52 minutes of ads...
although , with the state of television these days, you never know.
Can someone make an adblocker for TV....?
a friend sent me this link to a very interesting video.
more adverse publicity for the wtbts.
(apologies if already posted).
thanks darkspilver
I guess that makes sense.....
I was pretty sure it didn't mean 52 minutes of ads...
although , with the state of television these days, you never know.
Can someone make an adblocker for TV....?
a friend sent me this link to a very interesting video.
more adverse publicity for the wtbts.
(apologies if already posted).
the presenter says ..'' over the next hour....'',
I wonder why it only goes for 8 minutes then ?
Did anyone see it on TV.....?
every picture i have seen at him at beth shirim and other private places are with a bottle of alcohol.. while for me personally i couldn't care less anymore.... for jw's this is low moral character.
so i'm an going to guess he was a functioning alcoholic... how did that work with his closest workers?
was he gay too?
Rutherford could have used both....
every picture i have seen at him at beth shirim and other private places are with a bottle of alcohol.. while for me personally i couldn't care less anymore.... for jw's this is low moral character.
so i'm an going to guess he was a functioning alcoholic... how did that work with his closest workers?
was he gay too?
Hi there, Diogenesister
just to let you know that NO, the
'Julian Watson' video, that I posted, is not me........
I am much better looking than that.....😇
every picture i have seen at him at beth shirim and other private places are with a bottle of alcohol.. while for me personally i couldn't care less anymore.... for jw's this is low moral character.
so i'm an going to guess he was a functioning alcoholic... how did that work with his closest workers?
was he gay too?
Lots of info about Rutherford on this forum..
Don't know about the gay bit though...lol...
see the video and links
https://www.jehovahs-witness.com/topic/77915/rutherford-exposed-story-berta-bonnie
if i'm tierd i fall asleep anywere so the meetings ect were no diffrent my wife would always try to wake me but im a deep sleeper.
karter .
a pimo friend (physically in mentally out) has just informed me that the cult has decided that they want to suppress all old jw org information by removing bound volumes etc from kh libraries.. in reality, all through their history they have claimed divine "new light" as a means of changing uncomfortable doctrines.
this however would mean that new jws, or more likely these days young jws, will be prevented from seeing the old light which had been held up as divinely inspired truth in the past.. truth which would get you through big a and which if you didn't agree with would get you disfellowshipped.. anyone else heard of this?
what might be the reasons (if true) for removing the old wts?.
Oh the stories I could tell,....It's criminal
The Sydney Bethel dumped a bunch of stuff years ago, so I am told.
lots of literature, and a stack of those old Rutherford phonographs and records, all down the Tip....
has anyone else heard this?
a poster on another thread said it's a new rule brought in at this years convention.. last year they were told to shun even non df people and now this?
a religion cant force someone where to plonk their ass surely?.
you can't get anymore back row than my lounge room....
jehovah's witnesses have had to revise their chronology and various doctrinal interpretations due to events and scholarly corrections.
but the one teaching where they have been consistently ahead of the curve is the importance of jehovah's name.. .
i'm going to run through a (necessarily selective) timeline of jw events and scholarly publications that demonstrate the phenomenal success of this teaching in the last days.
has 'slim' been hacked by the Russians too......?
as we know being former jws that we were taught that jerusalem was destroyed then 70 years it would be desolate.
well this isn't about jerusalem and the 607/ 587 argument.
this is about the whole subject of the 70 years desolation being a huge bible fraud.