Sorry guys, but the evil Fox News actually wins this round (not on YouTube, not on the blogs) but in reality.
It’s all about context. Remember that context is king! Example: (ECCLESIASTES 9:5) does not mean what the witnesses would tell you it means when you read it in context.
Get a hold of the entire show and review it for yourself. The footage with the "palm trees" was of a violent union protest occurring in California and was clearly labeled “union protests” and also used in other Fox broadcasts (part of what is known as a b-roll in the industry. Bill O’ Smiley clearly identified the videos as collectively coming from all over the country early in his broadcast. The protest from Wisconsin is clearly labeled “Madison” should you care to look for yourself.
To be fair and balanced, (cough cough), I guess they could have or maybe even should have identified that they were at that very moment playing a portion of the b-roll film ( palm trees) while the voice narrative switched from union protests in general to specifically the one in Wisconsin.
For those who just tuned in and only saw that little damming segment, or maybe have a hard time following along the entire show, or perhaps have just a slight abhorrence of Foxxy News in general, I could see why you would think you caught them in an obvious blatant lie, sorry but you didn’t.
I’m just saying fair is fair and they shouldn’t be labeled as liars for this one. Now d
oes that make me a Fox ditto head for pointing this out?
Freeman