Let's not be ridiculous now and indulge in semantic subterfuge. I asked why has the population and techonology dramatically increased in the 20th century?
FrightMare
JoinedPosts by FrightMare
-
46
Jay Dubs right about 1914
by FrightMare inplease study this chart very, very carefully: http://www.sru.edu/depts/artsci/ges/d-3-2.htm.
why has such an unprecedented boom in population and technology occurred during the specific time the bible points to the 'last days', 1914?
-
46
Jay Dubs right about 1914
by FrightMare inplease study this chart very, very carefully: http://www.sru.edu/depts/artsci/ges/d-3-2.htm.
why has such an unprecedented boom in population and technology occurred during the specific time the bible points to the 'last days', 1914?
-
FrightMare
But Logical, that's not my question.
I'd like to see a direct answer to my question, this will be very interesting.
-
12
The Intellectual Taliban
by FrightMare inone of threads of this tapestry is the patent absurdity of darwinian evolution.
my attacks on darwinism are not motivated in the least by any desire to defend any superstitious story of our origins.
i believe that it will soon be possible to demonstrate mathematically that darwinian evolution is impossible.
-
FrightMare
My name is frightmare and I'm here to expose dogmatism.
-
46
Jay Dubs right about 1914
by FrightMare inplease study this chart very, very carefully: http://www.sru.edu/depts/artsci/ges/d-3-2.htm.
why has such an unprecedented boom in population and technology occurred during the specific time the bible points to the 'last days', 1914?
-
FrightMare
The question is why such a population and techonological explosion has occurred during this the 20th century especially?
-
12
The Intellectual Taliban
by FrightMare inone of threads of this tapestry is the patent absurdity of darwinian evolution.
my attacks on darwinism are not motivated in the least by any desire to defend any superstitious story of our origins.
i believe that it will soon be possible to demonstrate mathematically that darwinian evolution is impossible.
-
FrightMare
Dogmatism isn't going to help your cause silver, besides, evolution is not in dispute here, it's darwinism, that is evolution through solely strict naturalistic causes.
-
46
Jay Dubs right about 1914
by FrightMare inplease study this chart very, very carefully: http://www.sru.edu/depts/artsci/ges/d-3-2.htm.
why has such an unprecedented boom in population and technology occurred during the specific time the bible points to the 'last days', 1914?
-
FrightMare
Try it again, it works fine.
-
12
The Intellectual Taliban
by FrightMare inone of threads of this tapestry is the patent absurdity of darwinian evolution.
my attacks on darwinism are not motivated in the least by any desire to defend any superstitious story of our origins.
i believe that it will soon be possible to demonstrate mathematically that darwinian evolution is impossible.
-
FrightMare
Oh, my point is that the theory of evolution really seems to be no theory at all, but a grab bag of models and ad hoc explanations which cannot be formed into a coherent whole.
-
46
Jay Dubs right about 1914
by FrightMare inplease study this chart very, very carefully: http://www.sru.edu/depts/artsci/ges/d-3-2.htm.
why has such an unprecedented boom in population and technology occurred during the specific time the bible points to the 'last days', 1914?
-
FrightMare
Please study this chart very, very carefully: http://www.sru.edu/depts/artsci/ges/d-3-2.htm
Why has such an unprecedented boom in population and technology occurred during the specific time the Bible points to the 'last days', 1914?
-
12
The Intellectual Taliban
by FrightMare inone of threads of this tapestry is the patent absurdity of darwinian evolution.
my attacks on darwinism are not motivated in the least by any desire to defend any superstitious story of our origins.
i believe that it will soon be possible to demonstrate mathematically that darwinian evolution is impossible.
-
FrightMare
One of threads of this tapestry is the patent absurdity of Darwinian evolution. My attacks on Darwinism are not motivated in the least by any desire to defend any superstitious story of our origins. I believe that it will soon be possible to demonstrate mathematically that Darwinian evolution is impossible.
I do not object to your skepticism that such a proof will be produced. But I find obnoxious your closed minded attitude that such a project is absurd on some arbitrary a priori principles you are pleased to hold. Frankly, I can discern little difference in your attitudes towards Dembski and the Church's attitudes towards Galileo.
However, I do have a hard time understanding why you consider evolutionary biologists, to be scientists. Evolutionary biologists seem to be for the most part quite inferior mathematicians. The mathematical description of evolution is primitive, fragmented, and contradictory. The field of evolutionary biology seems to be mostly a discipline of myth making to explain away the gapping holes in their theories and lull the atheists to sleep soundly at night.
You call yourself a skeptic, but nothing could be further from the truth. A true skeptic questions conclusions, doubts premises, exposes assumptions. But you have allied yourself with an Intellectual Taliban rigidly enforcing a suffocating Orthodoxy of Thought. No longer will I call myself a skeptic, but rather I proclaim myself an Iconoclast.
You say a stranger can not give me a purpose? I think I found one, to vigorously oppose the dogmatic pronouncements of a Scientific Priesthood; to smash the Icons of Materialism, Scientism, Darwinsm; to free Mankind's intellectual and spiritual adventure from the dead hand of a bankrupt 19th century philosophy!
To the Intellectual Taliban:
I am your worst nightmare!
-
1
Damn registry
by FrightMare inhow the ef do you get into witnessesonline.com?
anyone here successful?
-
FrightMare
How the ef do you get into witnessesonline.com? Anyone here successful?