" at the bottom of the image on the back of the invitation raises some eyebrows, but last night in the routine district convention article during the service meeting, i caught that one of the paragraphs mentioned that we would be encouraged to keep a copy of the tract in hand for a discussion during sunday's last talk.
my guess is, there is going to be some new revelation about what the "?
" represents, or some other fangled idea.
100 year anniversary of the 1914 prophesy and the generation which shall not pass
Sweety,
We ditched that teaching 3 changes ago (1995 -representation of wicked people, 2008-anointed only (recycling 1927 light), 2010-anointed overlap)
There have been 6 changes (and waffling about when a person was born either before or the year of 1914 in between)
ahh low and behold!.
it turns out those bethelites were being bold!.
brazen is what many with login privileges can be called.... ....... knowing that such an important talk outline shouldn't be stalled!.
The SDAs dropped their Arianism to join the trinitarians and were suggested the fasts growing religion recently.....
I think there is a market should the WTS drop kickRutherford and Franz while expanding social and educational opportunities within the JW community similar to the Mormons...(who have 70% retention of born/raised compared to our 37%)
ahh low and behold!.
it turns out those bethelites were being bold!.
brazen is what many with login privileges can be called.... ....... knowing that such an important talk outline shouldn't be stalled!.
Giggles Yall!
SP Talk is this Sunday!!!!
Thoughts?
Huggles!
" at the bottom of the image on the back of the invitation raises some eyebrows, but last night in the routine district convention article during the service meeting, i caught that one of the paragraphs mentioned that we would be encouraged to keep a copy of the tract in hand for a discussion during sunday's last talk.
my guess is, there is going to be some new revelation about what the "?
" represents, or some other fangled idea.
nah yall all wrong ...all of the changes of late are merely to get from here to there (flashes) ....all under Jaracz....so I suggest this be the source of WTS light and expect a great many developed symposiums where it is flashed here and there showing signs of the end being nigh only for the WTS to highlight via pinpoint something else as 2015 become 2025:
(Matthew 24:23-24) . . ."Then if anyone says to YOU, ‘Look! Here is the Christ'’( ANOINTED )or, ‘There!’ do not believe it. 24 For false Christs ( ANOINTED )and false prophets will arise and will give great signs and wonders so as to mislead, if possible, even the chosen ones.
well to tell everyone shortly and simple like rubbish!
the 2 elders that were nice moved out and they were extremely friends and they saw that i had a hard time fitting me.
but the other elders are proud and stuffed up i don't go out of the way as i used to, why should i go out my way to say hello and how are you to someone that does not want to talk to me, they have such dumb reason we are busy with theocratic stuff, ya right like every meeting for the past 2 years i been in the hall you never had a chance.
I agree with Pirata...... he is hitting on you (potential pedophile!)
I am sorry they are being such dumbasses!
The good news is that you are intelligent and all you have to do is survive this tribulation until you can get out on your own......you can do that, it will suck balls but it is doable....... then move out and on, busy yourself with your studies, worldlie associations, and career path!
giggles here is an evil thought...... go out and fornicate right before you leave for Uni....confess to the CO and blame it on that brother for constantly suggesting you were gay!....feign serious stumbling......(nah...forget that idea, just get good grades, get accepted to Uni and go visit your non-jw relatives....they can be a nice replacement support system!)
" at the bottom of the image on the back of the invitation raises some eyebrows, but last night in the routine district convention article during the service meeting, i caught that one of the paragraphs mentioned that we would be encouraged to keep a copy of the tract in hand for a discussion during sunday's last talk.
my guess is, there is going to be some new revelation about what the "?
" represents, or some other fangled idea.
Great point Moshe!
Most JWs are converts and haven't a clue what our Kingdom message is......they always stumble around with no trinity, hellfire, immortality of soul and paradise.......
It would be very interesting if they ever did change the 'Kingdom Message' but I am sticking with the 2009 rumor of new light on KON....
i've heard it said that the watchtower printed an official stance on what qualifies as "adultery" at one point in the 1970s??
they said that a woman was not free to divorce her husband if her husband had sex with another man or with an animal, as such sexual relations did not constitute "becoming one flesh"... apparently vaginal intercourse is the only means of fusing two human bodies together.... what watchtower is such a doctrine found in?
is it in the wt cd-rom?
To add to LeavingWT comments about the reversal .....
Dec 15, 1972 QFR is where it can be found on the CD!!!
sat april 30 -2011 ,7 pm est.
on the six screens tele-network..... former jehovah's witnesses presiding overseer and watchtower historian richard rawe interviews a former jehovah's witness who was involved with the writing department of the watchtower society.. richards guest comes forward and speaks up, he is no longer inhibited or concerned with what the watchtower has to say.
wait to you find out what he was disfellowshipped for.. it is easy to get on the conference call.
I am going to be out of town on Saturday but if someone from the Six Screens could confirm JWN alias to me via PM (if said person has a history of posting)..... I will listen and maybe call in as permitted by circumstance
i've heard it said that the watchtower printed an official stance on what qualifies as "adultery" at one point in the 1970s??
they said that a woman was not free to divorce her husband if her husband had sex with another man or with an animal, as such sexual relations did not constitute "becoming one flesh"... apparently vaginal intercourse is the only means of fusing two human bodies together.... what watchtower is such a doctrine found in?
is it in the wt cd-rom?
click your username and chose the 'topics started' option.....it will show you every thread you will eventual start.....
there is also an option to chose 'topics posted on' to see threads you posted comments!
Again belated welcome to our little group, cant wait to see more from you!!
i've heard it said that the watchtower printed an official stance on what qualifies as "adultery" at one point in the 1970s??
they said that a woman was not free to divorce her husband if her husband had sex with another man or with an animal, as such sexual relations did not constitute "becoming one flesh"... apparently vaginal intercourse is the only means of fusing two human bodies together.... what watchtower is such a doctrine found in?
is it in the wt cd-rom?
Doubtful
So I noticed you joined while I was 'taking my share of fs provisions'.......(belated welcome and huggles)
Is there anything else you wanna know?..... WT history is always the most revealing!
