i've been a jw all my life and am thoroughly convinced this is the truth.
but there is one thing that i just don't understand.
many jw's believe that people who get resurrected in the new system will not get married.
I have actually found a proper (though not official) JW site, and I can have a serious, sensible discussion there so this will be my last post. I may send a private message to you mr majestic, I found you a good person to discuss things with
No it won't I'm sad to say. People like you are like aggressive cancer, you just keep coming back for more, spewing your pseudo-religious venom, and not facing the real truth about your so-called "truth". You are truly to be pitied.
never mind.
i can't get the picture to post.
if an administrator would like to delete this thread, that would be great.. .
You say you know but then go and prove you don't know.
No one is saying you can buy a 230 MPH motorcycle it just won't be street legal I.E. You can not drive it on the street do to the fact people ( yep this is the glass bottle delima some other moron ruins it for you ) can not be trusted to drive it safely on public roads
Say I know what? I said it as plainly as could, and won't say it again, but I will say this 5go. The next time you have thought...just let it go.
BTW stock Camaros with LS or LT motors will go way faster than 120 MPH
for anyone that looks at this thread, could you write something either profound or simply interesting so as to make the reader see the truth about "the truth"?
?
never mind.
i can't get the picture to post.
if an administrator would like to delete this thread, that would be great.. .
Let me tell you like it is. You do not have absolute freedom. If we did you could do what ever you wanted. We live in a civilized world with social contracts. One of which is you must obey safety regulations. We the people allow to purchase a vehicle that can go faster than the speed limit under the understanding you won't do it on public roads. So you may be able to easily do it on a private road ( considered off road ) if you want too. If people can not be trusted to do that and it becomes a big enough problem. Then the people through their representatives will force auto-makers to limit vehicles top speed via a governor. Don't like then move to Afghanistan where there is no functioning government and you and the locals may do what ever they please. Short of pissing the NATO forces in the area off.
Now 5go, let me tell you how it is. I know. I know. I know. I know. I know. I know. I know. There, 7 "I know"s. I'm quite aware that we don't enjoy absolute freedom here, and that absolute freedom probably wouldn't be as joyous as it sounds. Now, I will once again explain my position so that people who either love to argue, or don't have good reading comprehension, can understand.
I do not want a speed limited motorcycle. I do not want the Govt. to mandate that my motorcycle is speed limited. That being said, some people should not be on fast motorcycles, and because of that, the Govt. will probably mandate some sort of safety measure. When that time comes I'll obey the law, but won't like it, and will probably bitch about it constantly.
never mind.
i can't get the picture to post.
if an administrator would like to delete this thread, that would be great.. .
I see your point inkling. I think it means so much to me because riding has been such a part of my past, and I recoil at anybody trying to change it with rules like this. I know that there are people who don't need to be riding 170 HP superbikes, but I beleive alot of these same people could manage to kill or maim themselves on just about anything they threw a leg over. I guess what I need to say is, ride with respect for the law, respect for other drivers, wear at least a helmet if not more gear, and most of all, ride safely.
never mind.
i can't get the picture to post.
if an administrator would like to delete this thread, that would be great.. .
Nobody said anything about snakes. I never said that you should be allowed to ride recklessly on the road. I don't beleive the untrained should carry around dynamite.
I do not want any governmental entity to throttle my legally purchased vehicle, even though I may never, and indeed have no intention of, going at an insane speed while riding it. IS THAT SIMPLE ENOUGH TO UNDERSTAND?
never mind.
i can't get the picture to post.
if an administrator would like to delete this thread, that would be great.. .
never mind.
i can't get the picture to post.
if an administrator would like to delete this thread, that would be great.. .
Would a severe speed limiter (like less that 120 mph) affect the way the bike feels at lower speeds and acceleration
Most new bikes are fuel injected and computer controled, so limiting top-speed could be accomplished electronically. Honestly, this wouldn't affect the handling or acceleration of the machine, and most riders wouldn't get near the top of the limiter anyway.
Personally, I beleive that a tiered liscensing system, like that used in GB and Europe, would be the way to make riders and riding safer.
never mind.
i can't get the picture to post.
if an administrator would like to delete this thread, that would be great.. .
never mind.
i can't get the picture to post.
if an administrator would like to delete this thread, that would be great.. .