Okay Yadirf/Friday I'll bite.
You implied I was dishonest, saying "surely I must be the owner and operator of a not-so-honest used car lot".
Why'd you turn the heat on me personally, and then when Farkel turned the heat on you (saying your "life is a lie" and you were an "apostate"), you whined in this fashion:
ME, me, me. Let's talk about JW.com, JW.com, JW.com ... and how that title misrepresents the facts.If you didn't want Farkel to bash you, then why did you bash me (somebody you don't even know)?
I never posted on H2O, because by the time I got out of the JW organization and discovered these discussion boards earlier this year, H2O looked to me like a war zone, very disorganized.
Today, I merely pointed out an inconsistency in Rick's post that I didn't understand. Why did you attack ME rather than answer the point of my concern? Sheesh.
Now, as to whether this site is actually misleading or not, take a look at the following link, which is Simon's preview of how the next upgrade will look.
* http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/fs/3/default.htm
You will notice two key phrases here, "bulletin board service for the JW and ex-JW community", and "Any Jehovahs Witness or interested person can participate". And Simon means what he says, you can post here without fear of editing or deletion (unless you go WAY over the top). Nothing at all misleading there, eh?
There, I have given you a point-by-point, substantive answer. Or would you rather I have sunk to your level and called you dirty names? Maybe that would make you happier, but I'm not here to make you happy!
GopherIt is not best that we all should think alike, it is differences of opinion that make horse races.
Mark Twain (1835-1910)