Leolaia,
I find it interesting that instead of responding to the individual points I made or the evidence I supplied, Sabrina reduces the whole issue on the resurrection and immortality down to whether my posts "promote faith in the Bible".
Leo, my question was posed to LT because he has stated he is a believer and a Christian. Therefore his beliefs were to me relevant.
If the answer is no, does that mean my points and evidence are discredited? Or if yes, does it mean that a view that merely promotes faith in the Bible is to be found correct or preferred -- regardless of what the evidence is?
You totally misread the whole of my question. I wanted to know what
LT thought. You continue to look at the miniscule and miss the obvious.
As it is, I fail to see how my post -- which attempted to explain the biblical view(s) on the resurrection and the afterlife as explained in the Bible itself and illuminated by contemporary Jewish writings (including Josephus) -- has any bearing on "faith in the Bible". I would rather say that it supports the Bible's view of the resurrection against the misunderstandings promoted by the Watchtower Society. My post was instead designed as rejecting "faith in the Watchtower Society".
I give you that. But lady, your general tone is anti-Bible. And LT's shying here and there about it is not manly because it is well known here that you do not support the inspiration of the Bible.
Sabrina