It seems to me that you are trying to find reasons to dismiss Leo's reasoning.
No, I am trying to find out what LT believes.
Sabrina
i must admit that as a jw i never really swallowed this belief maybe because i was so young when i was really a staunch jw.
i would have born-again christians tell me that it was impossible for jesus and michael to be the same person and that jw's invented this doctrine.
fast forward to 2004 while i was reading a book on jesus i noticed that some of the early church fathers thought michael was jesus christ i almost fell out of my chair.
It seems to me that you are trying to find reasons to dismiss Leo's reasoning.
No, I am trying to find out what LT believes.
Sabrina
i must admit that as a jw i never really swallowed this belief maybe because i was so young when i was really a staunch jw.
i would have born-again christians tell me that it was impossible for jesus and michael to be the same person and that jw's invented this doctrine.
fast forward to 2004 while i was reading a book on jesus i noticed that some of the early church fathers thought michael was jesus christ i almost fell out of my chair.
Little Toe,
You said you partook of the emblems as a JW. Do you today feel the same as you did then?
Sabrina
i must admit that as a jw i never really swallowed this belief maybe because i was so young when i was really a staunch jw.
i would have born-again christians tell me that it was impossible for jesus and michael to be the same person and that jw's invented this doctrine.
fast forward to 2004 while i was reading a book on jesus i noticed that some of the early church fathers thought michael was jesus christ i almost fell out of my chair.
Leolaia,
I find it interesting that instead of responding to the individual points I made or the evidence I supplied, Sabrina reduces the whole issue on the resurrection and immortality down to whether my posts "promote faith in the Bible".Leo, my question was posed to LT because he has stated he is a believer and a Christian. Therefore his beliefs were to me relevant.
If the answer is no, does that mean my points and evidence are discredited? Or if yes, does it mean that a view that merely promotes faith in the Bible is to be found correct or preferred -- regardless of what the evidence is?You totally misread the whole of my question. I wanted to know what LT thought. You continue to look at the miniscule and miss the obvious.
As it is, I fail to see how my post -- which attempted to explain the biblical view(s) on the resurrection and the afterlife as explained in the Bible itself and illuminated by contemporary Jewish writings (including Josephus) -- has any bearing on "faith in the Bible". I would rather say that it supports the Bible's view of the resurrection against the misunderstandings promoted by the Watchtower Society. My post was instead designed as rejecting "faith in the Watchtower Society".
I give you that. But lady, your general tone is anti-Bible. And LT's shying here and there about it is not manly because it is well known here that you do not support the inspiration of the Bible.
Sabrina
i must admit that as a jw i never really swallowed this belief maybe because i was so young when i was really a staunch jw.
i would have born-again christians tell me that it was impossible for jesus and michael to be the same person and that jw's invented this doctrine.
fast forward to 2004 while i was reading a book on jesus i noticed that some of the early church fathers thought michael was jesus christ i almost fell out of my chair.
Frank,
This was my question:
LT,
I ask you again, please.
Do Leo's posts promote faith in the Bible?
Sabrina
i must admit that as a jw i never really swallowed this belief maybe because i was so young when i was really a staunch jw.
i would have born-again christians tell me that it was impossible for jesus and michael to be the same person and that jw's invented this doctrine.
fast forward to 2004 while i was reading a book on jesus i noticed that some of the early church fathers thought michael was jesus christ i almost fell out of my chair.
Dear Michelle,
My question to LT still stands: Do Leo's posts promote faith in the Bible?
Sabrina
i must admit that as a jw i never really swallowed this belief maybe because i was so young when i was really a staunch jw.
i would have born-again christians tell me that it was impossible for jesus and michael to be the same person and that jw's invented this doctrine.
fast forward to 2004 while i was reading a book on jesus i noticed that some of the early church fathers thought michael was jesus christ i almost fell out of my chair.
LT,
I ask you again, please.
Do Leo's posts promote faith in the Bible?
Sabrina
i must admit that as a jw i never really swallowed this belief maybe because i was so young when i was really a staunch jw.
i would have born-again christians tell me that it was impossible for jesus and michael to be the same person and that jw's invented this doctrine.
fast forward to 2004 while i was reading a book on jesus i noticed that some of the early church fathers thought michael was jesus christ i almost fell out of my chair.
Sorry LT, when I posted my comment I had not yet seen your edit. I post online and do take some time to compose the post.
How do Leo's posts support your stand on the soul?
Do you feel Leo promotes faith in the Bible?
Sabrina
i must admit that as a jw i never really swallowed this belief maybe because i was so young when i was really a staunch jw.
i would have born-again christians tell me that it was impossible for jesus and michael to be the same person and that jw's invented this doctrine.
fast forward to 2004 while i was reading a book on jesus i noticed that some of the early church fathers thought michael was jesus christ i almost fell out of my chair.
Hi LT,
I look forward to your post! Though in all candor you did not answer my questions.
Sabrina
i must admit that as a jw i never really swallowed this belief maybe because i was so young when i was really a staunch jw.
i would have born-again christians tell me that it was impossible for jesus and michael to be the same person and that jw's invented this doctrine.
fast forward to 2004 while i was reading a book on jesus i noticed that some of the early church fathers thought michael was jesus christ i almost fell out of my chair.
LT,
Are you saying that Leolaia is explaining the Biblical stand on the question of the soul? Is Leo really upholding the scriptures, LT?
Sabrina
i must admit that as a jw i never really swallowed this belief maybe because i was so young when i was really a staunch jw.
i would have born-again christians tell me that it was impossible for jesus and michael to be the same person and that jw's invented this doctrine.
fast forward to 2004 while i was reading a book on jesus i noticed that some of the early church fathers thought michael was jesus christ i almost fell out of my chair.
Hi Myelaine,
Would you and LT be willing to start a thread on the Soul?
I hope so.
Sabrina