I've been exposed to both. I honestly don't get the idea that one is better than the other either aesthetically or physically. Sexually, I think both are great and neither is gross at all.
If I had a son, I'd opt not to have him circumcised. If he felt it was something he needed to do to fit in with peers or to be accepted by women, I'd fully support his decision.
I think I would feel that way about any kind of body alteration.
QUOTE:
"I've worked in rest homes, and it's no big deal, frankly some of the women were no picnic either. And that's the point I'm gonna get at. First, let's look at a reversal. The female equivalent of male circumcision would be having the hood of your clit removed. Sound fun? Y'all have parts and folds that are just as internal and hard to keep clean. Having dirty "junk" is gross, period, chopped and lowered regardless."
I was thinking the exact same thing... dirty is gross. If women can keep clean, so can an intact man.