energy and matter are neither created nor destroyed.. consequently, the building blocks of existence are actually finite parts.. to create things in "tomorrow" which are new, something has to be dismantled to leave spare parts for tomorrow's new thing.. the old thing deteriorates, (dies/disintegrates) and the parts become available to make the new thing.. time travel requires going to a place where today's parts are available to be rearranged.. some of today's things persist as they are, of course.
they only travel through time by persisting as they are.
(mountains, for example.).
I have a question to further the debate. How is it determined how much energy is in a given photon of energy? (there is a specific formula but once you answer the question I will demonstrate a parodox )
The formula can be found in Selman's book " The Fundamentals of X-ray and Radium Physics"
energy and matter are neither created nor destroyed.. consequently, the building blocks of existence are actually finite parts.. to create things in "tomorrow" which are new, something has to be dismantled to leave spare parts for tomorrow's new thing.. the old thing deteriorates, (dies/disintegrates) and the parts become available to make the new thing.. time travel requires going to a place where today's parts are available to be rearranged.. some of today's things persist as they are, of course.
they only travel through time by persisting as they are.
(mountains, for example.).
Recovering at some point that must have happened.
Actually according to current scientific theory no, matter is finite and has never been created. If you accept the big bang theory , all the matter in the universe started out congealed in one incredibly dense point . This matter for some unknown reason exploded into the universe that we know today. It postulates that all matter originates from this.
Energy cannot only be the motion of particles. That would be just one form energy
You are correct energy is not only concerned with motion (kinetic energy) There are other forms for example electromagnetic energy.
Are photons truly particulate in nature?
Ah you have touched on a very complex subject . Photons exhibit the behaviors of both waves and particles of matter .The division of physics that tries to explain this is quantum physics. The specific theory is wave particle duality principle It is a complex topic, but among the most intriguing in physics.
Thank you Terry for providing me with the intellectual stimulation that I have been lacking, it is nice to deal with theoretic science rather than applied science for a change.
energy and matter are neither created nor destroyed.. consequently, the building blocks of existence are actually finite parts.. to create things in "tomorrow" which are new, something has to be dismantled to leave spare parts for tomorrow's new thing.. the old thing deteriorates, (dies/disintegrates) and the parts become available to make the new thing.. time travel requires going to a place where today's parts are available to be rearranged.. some of today's things persist as they are, of course.
they only travel through time by persisting as they are.
(mountains, for example.).
No. In our universe it is impossible for an area of space to contain nothing. Any region of space that is empty will have particles of matter spontaneously emerge to fill in the "nothing".
Elsewhere I would like to point out to you that the laws of physics do not allow for matter to be spontaneosly created. I believe the link you provided is speaking about vacuum energy a purely theoretical concept.
energy and matter are neither created nor destroyed.. consequently, the building blocks of existence are actually finite parts.. to create things in "tomorrow" which are new, something has to be dismantled to leave spare parts for tomorrow's new thing.. the old thing deteriorates, (dies/disintegrates) and the parts become available to make the new thing.. time travel requires going to a place where today's parts are available to be rearranged.. some of today's things persist as they are, of course.
they only travel through time by persisting as they are.
(mountains, for example.).
hmm The argument for and against time travel is very interesting. Einsteins theories of relativity seem to allow for time travel however Stephen Hawkins string theory seems to rule it out. Einstein's theory says the faster an object moves the slower time passes for that object in relation to the stationary observer. His theory goes on to state as you aproach the speed of light time indeed sslows and stops, once the speed of light is achieved. Indeed his theory seems to point to the possibility that if the speed of light is surpassed time would start going backwards for that object. (theory of special relativity)
Hawkins on the other hand postulates that the speed of light is finite , therefore time can never go in reverse. He also theorizes that in order to manipulate time,you would need a region where a weak energy condition is satisfied, meaning that the region contains no matter with negative energy density (exotic matter)
Hawkins explainanation is addressed in his 1992 paper on the chronology protection conjecture, where he examines "the case that the causality violations appear in a finite region of spacetime without curvature singularities" and proves that "[t]here will be a Cauchy horizon that is compactly generated and that in general contains one or more closed null geodesics which will be incomplete. One can define geometrical quantities that measure the Lorentz boost and area increase on going round these closed null geodesics. If the causality violation developed from a noncompact initial surface, the averaged weak energy condition must be violated on the Cauchy horizon."
By the way do not concern yourself to much with the mathamatics involved just concentrate on the explanation. I am a medical radiation physicist and I to have a hard time with the mathmatical argument Hawkins proposes .
lately, i've come to find out that a more than a few people in the area had killed themselves.
most of the people i know of were in their early twenties or forties.
for those loved ones surviving them, it was mostly a shock!
sadly to many it just means an end to their pain
It is not a solution; however please understand most people who contemplate suicide do so from a feeling of emotional despair. They do not approach the subject from a logical point of view it is purely an emotional reaction. I know as someone who from time to time suffers from periods of intense emotional turmoil. I know rationally it is a long term solution to a short term problem. When I get this feeling I immediately have to do something to refocus my mind so I do not dwell on these thoughts. I think about my children, my wife and my grandchildren and how they would be affected. I do everything in my power to not dwell on the emotional turmoil that puts me in this state. Am I an emotional mess? Yes I will be the first to admit that.
lately, i've come to find out that a more than a few people in the area had killed themselves.
most of the people i know of were in their early twenties or forties.
for those loved ones surviving them, it was mostly a shock!
I strugle every day to just live one more day to be honest. I have lost so much. I do know of a former jw who commited suicide. I try not to dwell on suicidal thoughts due to the pain it caused his family. I will relate what happened to this poor man at some point.
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/lake/os-lk-groveland-alcohol-20100315,0,6854922.story?page=1.
Oh would it not be ironic for a group of apostates to sit in the front row and drink the wine
i would value your opinions on how best to handle a dilema i have with a rental contract i signed.. 1-a year ago i agreed to let out a property i owned to a tennent.
i spoke to the council and they said i was responsible for the water and sewage and so i areed to pay it.
(would i failed to understand that it was my responsibility to pay the council but i was entiltled to ask the tennent tp pay me these monies.. 2-i also failed to take into consideration the basement , landing and hallways in working out the rent which is based on the kvm size of the house.. therefore on point 2 alone he is paying me 25% less a month than the correct monthly rental-.
First how long is your lease for ?
next you need to check and see if the law allows you to bill the tenent for the water bill I know that some jurisdictions do not
stop spamming joeleejr44
