Lol I'll take that as a compliment. And interestingly there was no plagarism involved so......
Well, apart from the text you copied out of the WT article, so....... ;-)
passwordprotected
JoinedPosts by passwordprotected
-
42
The hidden message in the June 15 2009 watchtower.
by Hobo Ken inthis study will set the tone for future-proofing the watchtower society doctrine that their governing body is "the faithful slave" mentioned in parable by jesus in matthew24.. i thought as i read the study article starting on p.20 that the most important thing about this piece is what is missing, what is not said.. the first paragraph sets the tone of what they are trying to convey.. "while giving the composite sign of the last days jesus said, who really is the faithful and discreet slave?".
i believe what they are doing with the opening paragraph is placing the authority and position of "the slave" within the context of the signs of the times thus attempting to validate it.
without mentioning when they became such.. they then say that jesus would "reward" and appoint this slave over all his belongings.
-
-
passwordprotected
-
59
Elimination of Jesus from Song Book?
by twinkletoes inive recently been looking at a non-jw tract this was an interesting paragraph.
watchtower 1st 1954 page 31. there we read "jehovahs witnesses are proud of the fact that they have eliminated from their song books, songs praising jesus (revelation, its grand climax at hand, page 36)".
i was in the org.
-
-
passwordprotected
LMAO.
Don't f*ck with me!
Yes, you are indeed the man.
-
59
Elimination of Jesus from Song Book?
by twinkletoes inive recently been looking at a non-jw tract this was an interesting paragraph.
watchtower 1st 1954 page 31. there we read "jehovahs witnesses are proud of the fact that they have eliminated from their song books, songs praising jesus (revelation, its grand climax at hand, page 36)".
i was in the org.
-
-
passwordprotected
Yes,
Personal Attack!All the things which come out from your brains are excrement/crap.
[giggle]. Fantastic.
-
59
Elimination of Jesus from Song Book?
by twinkletoes inive recently been looking at a non-jw tract this was an interesting paragraph.
watchtower 1st 1954 page 31. there we read "jehovahs witnesses are proud of the fact that they have eliminated from their song books, songs praising jesus (revelation, its grand climax at hand, page 36)".
i was in the org.
-
-
passwordprotected
4Q!
Your avatar is not good, either.
Personal Attack!
-
42
The hidden message in the June 15 2009 watchtower.
by Hobo Ken inthis study will set the tone for future-proofing the watchtower society doctrine that their governing body is "the faithful slave" mentioned in parable by jesus in matthew24.. i thought as i read the study article starting on p.20 that the most important thing about this piece is what is missing, what is not said.. the first paragraph sets the tone of what they are trying to convey.. "while giving the composite sign of the last days jesus said, who really is the faithful and discreet slave?".
i believe what they are doing with the opening paragraph is placing the authority and position of "the slave" within the context of the signs of the times thus attempting to validate it.
without mentioning when they became such.. they then say that jesus would "reward" and appoint this slave over all his belongings.
-
-
passwordprotected
If you choose to be (or remain) there, that's how it works: whoever is the boss is the boss.
This is a very good point, hence Hobo's brother saying we shouldn't be dogmatic about it. I reckon most JWs don't really care about the roots and origins of their religion. They only care about their next social outing, who's bitching about who behind who's back, the fact they don't need to "worship the Trinity" and whether the weather is going to be kind at this year's convention.
-
15
ROMANS 10:13 NTW on the wall in the "kingdom halls"?
by Chalam ini just watched this .
nbc jehovah's witnesses child sexual abuse.
whilst watching i was draw to the ntw romans 10:13 which was on the wall.. never having been in a "kingdom hall" is this on the wall in every kingdom hall?.
-
-
passwordprotected
@ possible;
“When anyone is replying to a matter before he hears [it], that is foolishness on his part and a humiliation.”
PROVERBS 18:13 (NWT)LOL, I don't need to hear anything other than this;
"I interpret the Bible entirely symbolically and figuratively."
I now know all I need to know about any comment you make make on the Bible; you view the Bible as symbolic and figurative. I happen to disagree with you. Continue calling me stupid and foolish, it's no biggie.
-
59
Elimination of Jesus from Song Book?
by twinkletoes inive recently been looking at a non-jw tract this was an interesting paragraph.
watchtower 1st 1954 page 31. there we read "jehovahs witnesses are proud of the fact that they have eliminated from their song books, songs praising jesus (revelation, its grand climax at hand, page 36)".
i was in the org.
-
-
passwordprotected
Woah! Where's Simon to defend me?!
-
42
The hidden message in the June 15 2009 watchtower.
by Hobo Ken inthis study will set the tone for future-proofing the watchtower society doctrine that their governing body is "the faithful slave" mentioned in parable by jesus in matthew24.. i thought as i read the study article starting on p.20 that the most important thing about this piece is what is missing, what is not said.. the first paragraph sets the tone of what they are trying to convey.. "while giving the composite sign of the last days jesus said, who really is the faithful and discreet slave?".
i believe what they are doing with the opening paragraph is placing the authority and position of "the slave" within the context of the signs of the times thus attempting to validate it.
without mentioning when they became such.. they then say that jesus would "reward" and appoint this slave over all his belongings.
-
-
passwordprotected
Surprisingly good post, Hobo.
-
59
Elimination of Jesus from Song Book?
by twinkletoes inive recently been looking at a non-jw tract this was an interesting paragraph.
watchtower 1st 1954 page 31. there we read "jehovahs witnesses are proud of the fact that they have eliminated from their song books, songs praising jesus (revelation, its grand climax at hand, page 36)".
i was in the org.
-
-
passwordprotected
@ possible;
I said,
"Only when you attack the doctrine of Jehovah's Witnesses, what you say "Jehovah is only the Father" is not allowed."Is language an issue here again? I am not saying Jehovah is the Father. I am saying this is the belief of Jehovah's Witnesses.
-
59
Elimination of Jesus from Song Book?
by twinkletoes inive recently been looking at a non-jw tract this was an interesting paragraph.
watchtower 1st 1954 page 31. there we read "jehovahs witnesses are proud of the fact that they have eliminated from their song books, songs praising jesus (revelation, its grand climax at hand, page 36)".
i was in the org.
-
-
passwordprotected
@ possible;
Actually, I will address this;
Only when you attack the doctrine of Jehovah's Witnesses, what you say "Jehovah is only the Father" is not allowed.
If you go back and read what I posted you'll notice I actually say;
Removing honour from Jesus actually removes honour from the Father, whom JWs believe to be Jehovah.
The operative phrase is "whom JWs believe to be Jehovah". As I am not a JW, I am not stating that this is what I believe.