i have seen in the kjv which most christians use who are not jw's.
and seen so many contradictions, here is one:.
isaiah 45:6that they may know from the rising of the sun and from the west that there is none besides me.
Hi, Mosesjoel.
Are you an active Jehovah's Witnesses?
I have seen in The KJV which most Christians use who are not JW's
Don't you know that the Watch Tower society is printing the King James Version?
http://xbbs.knacks.biz/possible01/a751
I think that your explanation itself is nonsense.
The King James Version which you criticize is the translation which Jehovah's Witnesses also use.
possible
http://bb2.atbb.jp/possible/
part of the reasoning for the end coming in 1975 was that would be 6000 years after creation.
the 1000 year reign would start and the end of it would coincide with the 7000 rest for god (like an omnipotent god needed to rest after creation, but that is a different topic.).
the 1966 book life everlasting, which presented the idea that the end would be 1975 lists in the following table that the 1000 year reign ends in 2975.. that was a neat concept prior to 1975, but since armageddon did not come then it now makes watchtower eschatology look quite foolish, and more so with each passing year.
Probably, the view that the millennium has started since 1975 is the most satisfactory view in Jehovah's Witnesses.
That is, this earth has been paradise now since 1975.
(Well, this opinion is not my real intention.)
possible
http://bb2.atbb.jp/possible/
most here know that the teaching of the wt contradictory, deceitful and unbiblical.. there are many who have left the kingdom hall either physically or just mentally.. .
however, why does the hard work of cd-rom searching, nwt cross referencing and such continue for many?.
these are some possible reasons i guess.. 1. you want to expose the false wt doctrine even further or just learn the full extent of the deception?.
Um...
I think ... in order to protect people from a person like you?
http://www.jehovahs-witness.net/watchtower/bible/172746/1/NWT-KIT-Prove-Jesus-IS-Jehovah
possible
i seem to be drawing a blank, but i can't recall what the the "accepted" translation for jw's was pre-nwt?
if it was the kj or one of the other translations favored by christendom, how did the wts work around the translation errors "corrected" by the nwt?...john 1:1, extensive use of jehovah in nt, etc.
?.
tenyearsafter,
sometimes a cloudy memory can be a good thing!
Yeah.
It is a "good thing."
You are completely right.
We have not needed the doctrine of the Watch Tower society's trash fundamentally.
i seem to be drawing a blank, but i can't recall what the the "accepted" translation for jw's was pre-nwt?
if it was the kj or one of the other translations favored by christendom, how did the wts work around the translation errors "corrected" by the nwt?...john 1:1, extensive use of jehovah in nt, etc.
?.
Hi, tenyearsafter,
I must be getting old and forgetful, but you have all helped to jog a cloudy memory!!
I stopped going meetings of JW about five years ago.
I do not remember that accurate date.
Those many of the materials of JW are "trash."
I think that you may not need to remember correctly except when you want to attack the JW's organization.
i seem to be drawing a blank, but i can't recall what the the "accepted" translation for jw's was pre-nwt?
if it was the kj or one of the other translations favored by christendom, how did the wts work around the translation errors "corrected" by the nwt?...john 1:1, extensive use of jehovah in nt, etc.
?.
tenyearsafter,
You can find most things by Google now.
And please utilize the "collection of Web links" in my website.
http://godpresencewithin.web.fc2.com/pages/link/link09.html
About John 1:1, please refer to page 86 of "Millennial Dawn, Vol. 5" (Studies in the Scriptures, Series V), etc.
http://www.strictlygenteel.co.uk/atonement/atonestudy3.html
possible
http://bb2.atbb.jp/possible/
ok...now this is the last part of appendix 1d in the reference bible...so if you want to check out rev.
22: 18,19 it says we can not change a single thing...not a word about this scroll...and moses was told the same thing about the law if you check the cross reference...so why is it they change ky (not the lube...plus astroglide is way better) ky rios, which is lord....to yhwh!....jehovah!!
!....so if you see the j thingys and numbers....that is all the crappy dark ages bibles that also changed the bible to suit them.....so since they changed the bible...it makes us legit to do it too?!?!?
It has written on the book "Insight" (published in 1988) as follows.
*** it-2 p. 10 Jehovah ***
But as far back as the 14th century the Tetragrammaton had already begun to be used in translations of the Christian Scriptures into Hebrew, beginning with the translation of Matthew into Hebrew that was incorporated in the work ’E′ven bo′chan by Shem-Tob ben Isaac Ibn Shaprut. Wherever Matthew quoted from the Hebrew Scriptures, this translation used the Tetragrammaton in each case of its occurrence. Many other Hebrew translations have since followed the same practice.
This explanation is not correct, either.
possible
ok...now this is the last part of appendix 1d in the reference bible...so if you want to check out rev.
22: 18,19 it says we can not change a single thing...not a word about this scroll...and moses was told the same thing about the law if you check the cross reference...so why is it they change ky (not the lube...plus astroglide is way better) ky rios, which is lord....to yhwh!....jehovah!!
!....so if you see the j thingys and numbers....that is all the crappy dark ages bibles that also changed the bible to suit them.....so since they changed the bible...it makes us legit to do it too?!?!?
slimboyfat,
Since he thanked to me, I do not want to say to you now.
In the future, he will thank to other persons.
If he has said "the word of appreciation" spontaneously even if I do not exert coercion, I think that I was probably gladder.
People do not only get impression by whether the person has knowledge.
possible
http://bb2.atbb.jp/possible/
ok...now this is the last part of appendix 1d in the reference bible...so if you want to check out rev.
22: 18,19 it says we can not change a single thing...not a word about this scroll...and moses was told the same thing about the law if you check the cross reference...so why is it they change ky (not the lube...plus astroglide is way better) ky rios, which is lord....to yhwh!....jehovah!!
!....so if you see the j thingys and numbers....that is all the crappy dark ages bibles that also changed the bible to suit them.....so since they changed the bible...it makes us legit to do it too?!?!?
Narkissos,
I saw your post and got the impressions that "you are a person who does not thank."
I think that it is more important than knowledge.
From now on, nobody may not need to teach you a link.
If there are any of your opinions about this, I will listen to it.
possible
http://bb2.atbb.jp/possible/
ok...now this is the last part of appendix 1d in the reference bible...so if you want to check out rev.
22: 18,19 it says we can not change a single thing...not a word about this scroll...and moses was told the same thing about the law if you check the cross reference...so why is it they change ky (not the lube...plus astroglide is way better) ky rios, which is lord....to yhwh!....jehovah!!
!....so if you see the j thingys and numbers....that is all the crappy dark ages bibles that also changed the bible to suit them.....so since they changed the bible...it makes us legit to do it too?!?!?
I think that I already linked and show.
http://www.jehovahs-witness.net/watchtower/beliefs/173351/1/BTW-Jude-is-the-One-Hit-Wonder-of-the-NWT-Bible
Well, that scanned picture (Hebrew New Testament) is usually protected under copyright.
The best choice is that you buy that translation.
possible
http://bb2.atbb.jp/possible/
