i just watched this .
nbc jehovah's witnesses child sexual abuse.
whilst watching i was draw to the ntw romans 10:13 which was on the wall.. never having been in a "kingdom hall" is this on the wall in every kingdom hall?.
Mr. passwordprotected.
This is probably in my top 5 of ridiculous things I've read on this forum. Was Jesus raised from the dead "symbolically and figuratively"?
I am explaining nothing in this forum about resurrection.
While I am explaining nothing, nothing is funnier than you conclude that "it is ridiculous."
The Bible is described like this.
“When anyone is replying to a matter before he hears [it], that is foolishness on his part and a humiliation.”
PROVERBS 18:13 (NWT)
ive recently been looking at a non-jw tract this was an interesting paragraph.
watchtower 1st 1954 page 31. there we read "jehovahs witnesses are proud of the fact that they have eliminated from their song books, songs praising jesus (revelation, its grand climax at hand, page 36)".
i was in the org.
Mr. passwordprotected.
Is language an issue here again?
This is only the problem that your reply was earlier than my post.
possible
ive recently been looking at a non-jw tract this was an interesting paragraph.
watchtower 1st 1954 page 31. there we read "jehovahs witnesses are proud of the fact that they have eliminated from their song books, songs praising jesus (revelation, its grand climax at hand, page 36)".
i was in the org.
Ms. StAnn.
Please do not call him stupid.
I have not said that he is stupid.
I said,
"I feel that your explanation looks stupid."
(1) I feel...
(2) explanation
(3) looks...
If we apply your advice, it will become impossible for us to express our own opinions/feelings.
(In the organization of Jehovah's Witnesses, it was impossible indeed.)
But I appreciate your advice.
possible
ive recently been looking at a non-jw tract this was an interesting paragraph.
watchtower 1st 1954 page 31. there we read "jehovahs witnesses are proud of the fact that they have eliminated from their song books, songs praising jesus (revelation, its grand climax at hand, page 36)".
i was in the org.
Mr. passwordprotected.
I said,
"Only when you attack the doctrine of Jehovah's Witnesses, what you say "Jehovah is only the Father" is not allowed."
Although I understand some things which you want to say, my view is as above-mentioned.
According to your own belief (Jesus IS Jehovah), I think that you should just think, the divine name "Jehovah" whom Jehovah's Witnesses use is transposed to "Jesus."
possible
ive recently been looking at a non-jw tract this was an interesting paragraph.
watchtower 1st 1954 page 31. there we read "jehovahs witnesses are proud of the fact that they have eliminated from their song books, songs praising jesus (revelation, its grand climax at hand, page 36)".
i was in the org.
Mr. passwordprotected.
I do not say you the same thing.
Please look at my comment in the following thread.
http://www.jehovahs-witness.net/watchtower/beliefs/174192/3/Jehovah-created-Jesus-Jesus-is-a-god-and-mighty-god-Consider-these
possible
ive recently been looking at a non-jw tract this was an interesting paragraph.
watchtower 1st 1954 page 31. there we read "jehovahs witnesses are proud of the fact that they have eliminated from their song books, songs praising jesus (revelation, its grand climax at hand, page 36)".
i was in the org.
Mr. passwordprotected.
I feel that your explanation looks stupid.
You are a person who believes clearly "Jesus IS Jehovah."
So, for you, "Jehovah" and "Jesus" are exchangeable divine name.
After all, you also say "Jesus is Jehovah", in order to emphasize "Jesus" rather than "Jehovah."
http://www.jehovahs-witness.net/watchtower/beliefs/175170/1/ROMANS-10-13-NTW-on-the-wall-in-the-kingdom-halls
Only when you attack the doctrine of Jehovah's Witnesses, what you say "Jehovah is only the Father" is not allowed.
possible
ive recently been looking at a non-jw tract this was an interesting paragraph.
watchtower 1st 1954 page 31. there we read "jehovahs witnesses are proud of the fact that they have eliminated from their song books, songs praising jesus (revelation, its grand climax at hand, page 36)".
i was in the org.
In this forum, I looked at explanation of the Trinitarians who say, "Jesus is Jehovah" repeatedly.
I have explained at every time, "In the Trinity doctrine, Jesus is not Jehovah."
http://www.jehovahs-witness.net/watchtower/beliefs/175170/1/ROMANS-10-13-NTW-on-the-wall-in-the-kingdom-halls
http://www.jehovahs-witness.net/watchtower/beliefs/175020/1/Clarifying-the-Trinity-Doctrine
If that as they say "Jesus is Jehovah" is true, "songs praising Jesus" is the same meaning as "songs praising Jehovah."
i just watched this .
nbc jehovah's witnesses child sexual abuse.
whilst watching i was draw to the ntw romans 10:13 which was on the wall.. never having been in a "kingdom hall" is this on the wall in every kingdom hall?.
Hi, Mr. Chalam.
There is a thing which I want to say to you.
For you, "Jehovah" is clearly different from "Jesus."
Since you want to merely deny "Jehovah", you say repeatedly, "Jesus is Jehovah."
I think that your way/manner/style is foul/dirty.
Before, I said the same thing to you.
possible
i just watched this .
nbc jehovah's witnesses child sexual abuse.
whilst watching i was draw to the ntw romans 10:13 which was on the wall.. never having been in a "kingdom hall" is this on the wall in every kingdom hall?.
Hi, Mr. Chalam.
Thank you for your reply.
I interpret the Bible entirely symbolically and figuratively.
So, even if you and I look at the same Scriptures, probably interpretations of you and me are different, respectively.
For me, Jesus is "I AM."
But probably it is different from your interpretation.
http://bb2.atbb.jp/possible/viewtopic.php?t=40
I, an individual, think that the 21st century is not fundamentalists' period, IMHO
I hope people "graduate" from the view of fundamentalism.
possible
i just watched this .
nbc jehovah's witnesses child sexual abuse.
whilst watching i was draw to the ntw romans 10:13 which was on the wall.. never having been in a "kingdom hall" is this on the wall in every kingdom hall?.
Isn't it time you (or, we) stopped such same arguments?
http://www.jehovahs-witness.net/watchtower/beliefs/175020/4/Clarifying-the-Trinity-Doctrine
Mr. Chalam.
For you, "Jesus is Jehovah," is it?
You say, "Jesus is the same as YHWH."
Then, why do you get angry?
When you say "Jesus saves us", it is the same as saying "Jehovah saves us."
It is ridiculous that you say repeatedly, "Jesus is the one who saves, not "jehovah"."
