hooberus

Joined

• started 119 topics
• posted 2,517 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by hooberus

• 
  11

  The Blatant Immorality of the Creationists against Modern Science

  by Homerovah the Almighty in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i just viewed this interesting video on you-tube and i thought i'd post it up so you folks could have a look.. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fozw7-3ysns&feature=related.

  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bzjxbdyu10a&feature=related.

  don't know the reason for the pictures of girls are there, perhaps the author did that .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  hooberus

  Here is the precise science that the Creationists support themselves with in their side of the argument and reason.

  Before you post again why don't you read an actual book such as the one referenced earlier.

  http://saintpaulscience.com/contents.htm
• 
  11

  The Blatant Immorality of the Creationists against Modern Science

  by Homerovah the Almighty in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i just viewed this interesting video on you-tube and i thought i'd post it up so you folks could have a look.. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fozw7-3ysns&feature=related.

  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bzjxbdyu10a&feature=related.

  don't know the reason for the pictures of girls are there, perhaps the author did that .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  hooberus

  It really comes down to subjective reasoning on practical evidence without a prejudicial mindset and an open evaluation, something that lacks greatly in this debate.

  Mostly so on the part of the anti-creationists, who openly attempt to censor (by any means necessary)not only any alternative to evolutionary naturalism, but even mere evidence against evolution.
• 
  11

  The Blatant Immorality of the Creationists against Modern Science

  by Homerovah the Almighty in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i just viewed this interesting video on you-tube and i thought i'd post it up so you folks could have a look.. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fozw7-3ysns&feature=related.

  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bzjxbdyu10a&feature=related.

  don't know the reason for the pictures of girls are there, perhaps the author did that .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  hooberus

  One thing that can be confirmed and acknowledged is that most religionists/creationists haven't really consumed or studied the science of evolution to any length

  Nor have most professed evolutionists either.

  Evolutionists do not fully understand their own theory and its incredible flexibility.

  Evolutionary theory is a structureless smorgasbord.

  Many evolutionary illusions are created by evolutionists remaining silent on key issues. http://saintpaulscience.com/contents.htm
• 
  11

  The Blatant Immorality of the Creationists against Modern Science

  by Homerovah the Almighty in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i just viewed this interesting video on you-tube and i thought i'd post it up so you folks could have a look.. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fozw7-3ysns&feature=related.

  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bzjxbdyu10a&feature=related.

  don't know the reason for the pictures of girls are there, perhaps the author did that .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  hooberus

  Speaking of "deception", the video says early on that:

  "99.98% of Scientists Accept Evolution." and that "By conservative estimates, there are four times more historians who believe the hollocaust never existed, than there are scientists who reject evolution."

  Yet no references are given. Indeed the closest thing that one finds on the internet for such claims is a brief reference from a 1987 Newsweek article which refers to "one count" of scientists who support creationism. "By one count there are some 700 scientists with respectable academic credentials (out of a total of 480,000 U.S. earth and life scientists) who give credence to creation-science, the general theory that complex life forms did not evolve but appeared 'abruptly'." Martz & Mc Daniel 1987, p. 23

  Evolutionists seem to take this "one count" [possibly taken from just the membership of the C.R.S.which alone has around 700 members with advanced degress http://www.creationresearch.org ] of openly acknowledged creationist scientists from this old survey and then by default assign all the other scientists as "believers in evolution". Such a method obviously could grossly over-estimates the percentile of scientists who "accept evolution".

  One noted creationist researcher states that he was "able to, with little difficulty, assemble a list of almost 3,000 scientists and professors who reject evolutionary naturalism, most of whom hold a Ph.D. degree in some field of science." he then went on to say: " This is but a small percentage of the estimated 113,000 Darwin skeptics academics and scientists in the United States alone accordingly to a Harvard researcher (Gross and Simmons, 2006)." see (http://www.rae.org/darwinskeptics.html)

  However, even if the number was only 700 scientists are we to then believe that there are conservatively "four times" [2,800 !] more historians who believe the holocaust never existed ?
• 
  11

  The Blatant Immorality of the Creationists against Modern Science

  by Homerovah the Almighty in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i just viewed this interesting video on you-tube and i thought i'd post it up so you folks could have a look.. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fozw7-3ysns&feature=related.

  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bzjxbdyu10a&feature=related.

  don't know the reason for the pictures of girls are there, perhaps the author did that .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  hooberus

  It should also be noted that creationists themselves have published articles such as "Arguments we think creationists should not use" (http://creationontheweb.com/content/view/2996/) which caution against the use of arguments such as "all mutations are bad" etc. see also "Who's really pushing 'bad science'?" (http://creationontheweb.com/content/view/2891)
• 
  11

  The Blatant Immorality of the Creationists against Modern Science

  by Homerovah the Almighty in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i just viewed this interesting video on you-tube and i thought i'd post it up so you folks could have a look.. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fozw7-3ysns&feature=related.

  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bzjxbdyu10a&feature=related.

  don't know the reason for the pictures of girls are there, perhaps the author did that .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  hooberus

  First of all what is wrong with "immorality" and dishonesty to begin with?

  After all according to leading evolutionists evolutionary naturalism provides no objective basis for such things as morality.

  ‘Let me summarize my views on what modern evolutionary biology tells us loud and clear … There are no gods, no purposes, no goal-directed forces of any kind. There is no life after death. When I die, I am absolutely certain that I am going to be dead. That’s the end for me. There is no ultimate foundation for ethics, no ultimate meaning to life, and no free will for humans, either.’ Provine, W.B., Origins Research16(1), p.9, 1994.

  What if being "dishonest" helps a person to reproduce more offspring, then their more honest rivals? After all, according to evolutionists we are merely the result of differential reproduction acting on variance.
• 
  23

  Noah and the flood

  by Iwonder17 in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  ok, so i have been watching a show on the discovery channel about noah and it got me thinking....let's say that the whole world was covered in a floor about 6000 years ago.

  is it even possible to have the earth populate itself in just 6000 years?

  also, and more interesting, how can all of the different breads of animals get to all of the contenants and repopulate themselves in that short amount of time as well???

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  hooberus

  And thank you hoobrus, and BA, for your drive by posting.

  And, thank you for yours.

  Touche.

  Seriously though, when you post links to videos or webpages of the Kent Hovind sort, and then
  watch the rebuttal videos showing just how massively (and demonstratively) wrong many of his
  specific claims are, what is your reaction?

  [inkling]

  The only thing I posted was a link to the Creation Research Society.

  http://www.creationresearch.org
• 
  23

  Noah and the flood

  by Iwonder17 in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  ok, so i have been watching a show on the discovery channel about noah and it got me thinking....let's say that the whole world was covered in a floor about 6000 years ago.

  is it even possible to have the earth populate itself in just 6000 years?

  also, and more interesting, how can all of the different breads of animals get to all of the contenants and repopulate themselves in that short amount of time as well???

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  hooberus

  http://www.creationresearch.org

  And thank you hoobrus, and BA, for your drive by posting.

  And, thank you for yours.
• 
  23

  Noah and the flood

  by Iwonder17 in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  ok, so i have been watching a show on the discovery channel about noah and it got me thinking....let's say that the whole world was covered in a floor about 6000 years ago.

  is it even possible to have the earth populate itself in just 6000 years?

  also, and more interesting, how can all of the different breads of animals get to all of the contenants and repopulate themselves in that short amount of time as well???

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  hooberus

  http://www.creationresearch.org
• 
  13

  Is Evolution "Scientific" ?

  by hooberus in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  .

  is evolution scientific ?.

  http://creationontheweb.com/content/view/6155.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  hooberus

  Guy is too lazy to drag his stuff here, or even use his own words.

  Most of what I have typed here have been my own words.

  Why should i go there to see what is likely piffling dumpings;)

  Please don't then.