hosebracket

Joined

• started 2 topics
• posted 7 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by hosebracket

• 
  7

  Confirming WTS Scholastic Dishonesty

  by AlanF in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  some information i just received solidly nails the watchtower society's coffin shut in the intellectual honesty department.. since the society published the brochure should you believe in the trinity?

  in english in 1989, a number of people have complained that many of the citations were misrepresentations of the intent of the authors, or simply did not show what the society's writer claimed.

  this is in keeping with many other wts publications, such as the infamous 1985 creation book, which i have demonstrated contains at least a hundred misrepresentations, misinterpretations and assorted scholastic inaccuracies.. the society, as usual, gives incomplete citations for its source references in the trinity brochure.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  hosebracket

  I have written 2 letters to the society re scholastic dishonesty and they can be seen on my web site www.607v587.com

  Let me know what you think.

  Hose bracket
• 
  25

  need help re 607 date

  by hosebracket in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  i am new to this.. i have a problem.

  someone on my ministry asked me about the date that we hold so dear....607 bce and asked me to prove it to them.

  this would not be a problem i thought as the f&ds would have solid basis for using such a date.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  hosebracket

  hi

  I have started something here.I was searching the net and found this site www.607v587.com Is this bloke really a JW?

  Hose bracket
• 
  25

  need help re 607 date

  by hosebracket in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  i am new to this.. i have a problem.

  someone on my ministry asked me about the date that we hold so dear....607 bce and asked me to prove it to them.

  this would not be a problem i thought as the f&ds would have solid basis for using such a date.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  hosebracket

  seems that i ahve opened a can of worms here! I found a site that might be intersting. www.607v587.com

  hosebracket
• 
  11

  need help re 607 date

  by hosebracket in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  i am new to this.. i have a problem.

  someone on my ministry asked me about the date that we hold so dear....607 bce and asked me to prove it to them.

  this would not be a problem i thought as the f&ds would have solid basis for using such a date.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  hosebracket

  what is th eaddress of the folder?

  Hosebracket
• 
  24

  UK Posters/Lurkers

  by ISP in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  i guess we are the minority around here but please check in or email.. regards to all posters by the way!.

  i am from the north west.. regards.

  isp

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  hosebracket

  Essex
• 
  11

  need help re 607 date

  by hosebracket in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  i am new to this.. i have a problem.

  someone on my ministry asked me about the date that we hold so dear....607 bce and asked me to prove it to them.

  this would not be a problem i thought as the f&ds would have solid basis for using such a date.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  hosebracket

  Hi all

  I am new to this.

  I have a problem. Someone on my ministry asked me about the date that we hold so dear....607 BCE and asked me to prove it to them. This would not be a problem I thought as the F&DS would have solid basis for using such a date. Welll I looked at the encyclopedias at the back of the hall and every single one said that the first fall of Jerusalem was in 587 BCE. I then got in touch with the British Museum and they said the same thing. I even asked them if this date could be wrong and they replied "no" as the evidence is overwhelming. I have to return to this person to answer the question. To be honest I dont think that I have a case.

  Hose bracket
• 
  25

  need help re 607 date

  by hosebracket in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  i am new to this.. i have a problem.

  someone on my ministry asked me about the date that we hold so dear....607 bce and asked me to prove it to them.

  this would not be a problem i thought as the f&ds would have solid basis for using such a date.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  hosebracket

  Hi all

  I am new to this.

  I have a problem. Someone on my ministry asked me about the date that we hold so dear....607 BCE and asked me to prove it to them. This would not be a problem I thought as the F&DS would have solid basis for using such a date. Welll I looked at the encyclopedias at the back of the hall and every single one said that the first fall of Jerusalem was in 587 BCE. I then got in touch with the British Museum and they said the same thing. I even asked them if this date could be wrong and they replied "no" as the evidence is overwhelming. I have to return to this person to answer the question. To be hnest I dont think that I have a case.

  Hose bracket