Wonder if this dead cat will vote for Biden.
Bangalore
JoinedPosts by Bangalore
-
5
Dead Cat Receives Voter Registration In Mail
by Bangalore indead cat receives voter registration in mail.. https://thepoliticalinsider.com/georgia-dead-cat-receives-voter-registration-in-mail/.
-
Bangalore
-
5
Dead Cat Receives Voter Registration In Mail
by Bangalore indead cat receives voter registration in mail.. https://thepoliticalinsider.com/georgia-dead-cat-receives-voter-registration-in-mail/.
-
Bangalore
Dead Cat Receives Voter Registration In Mail.
https://thepoliticalinsider.com/georgia-dead-cat-receives-voter-registration-in-mail/
-
57
Prince Andrew & Jeffrey Epstein, WTF
by Simon inin fact, several "wtf"s, not least - why were you visiting a convicted pedophile after his release from prison, never-mind having any contact with him in the first place when his preoclivities seemed to be an open secret.. and the best he can some up with is "i don't remember"?
you don't remember?
there's a fucking photo of you with one of the victims and accessories to the crimes you dumb fuck!.
-
Bangalore
I guess Andy must be feeling terrified now that Maxwell has been arrested.
-
15
Happy birthday smiddy
by smiddy3 ina young 81 ,may there be many more.. but feeling about 91 at the present time ..
-
Bangalore
Happy Birthday, Smiddy.
-
44
Leaked WT Elder Training Video
by Vanderhoven7 inhttps://youtu.be/2nacvosx8n0.
good to see the caring brothers help establish depth of guilt..
-
Bangalore
They are more like slave masters than shepherds of the flock.
-
23
As Biden Struggles, Hillary Waits For The call
by Bangalore inhttps://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/495371-as-biden-struggles-hillary-waits-for-the-call.
.
any thoughts about this?.
-
Bangalore
https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/495371-as-biden-struggles-hillary-waits-for-the-call
Quite possible I think. Any thoughts about this?
-
42
Sad News Of Zing
by ZindagiNaMilegiDobaara invery sad news .i am zing's partner.
first time on any kind of blog so please forgive any mistakes.
we have lost zing to the coronavirus this saturday gone, in the early hours.
-
Bangalore
Sorry to hear about this. May he rest in peace.
-
70
Transcript Of Judicial Committee Meeting Of Dale & Bette Baker
by Bangalore intranscript of judicial committee meeting of dale & bette baker.. http://www.jehovahswitnessbooks.com/2010/03/judicial-committee-meeting-of-dale.html.
bangalore.
.
-
Bangalore
Dale: You know, something that bothered me too, and I have to say this to you because of the fact that we had many, many people coming into the organization, they were coming in droves-. If they got between you and a swimming pool, they got baptized. But after 1975, things really, really fell apart. And one of the things I observed, and I felt very strongly about - we were getting many of the basket cases of society, people who wanted something better, the failure of the churches, people with marriages on the rocks, kids running wild, that sort of thing. We had all kinds of problems. I felt that we made a big effort to get people to quit drinking, quit smoking, quit running around on their wives, things you could see, they're visible. We did a fairly good lob in that. New ones were going on momentum, because here was a new hope, something that would solve their problems. But then as far as really making Christians, we got them so busy going to meetings, studying for this, studying for that, going out in service, just on and on. I saw so many of those people spin, crash, and burn, after about three years, and they finally gave up and said, "this does not work either." Well, what some of those people needed was psychological counseling, family counseling - but boy, I'll tell you, that if you even breathed the word, you were on the carpet with the rest of the elders. We just weren't trained to do that sort of thing.
Bette: There were dozens of them who were suicidal, including an elder's wife and some of the pioneers, and do you think they'd even let them go to a psychologist who was a witness?
Dale: I saw so many needs within the congregation for services that we would not provide because we didn't believe in it. And you can't let a kid go to college, my God no, don't let him go to college! I got into all kinds of trouble for letting my son go to college. Thank God he did! And he's a very committed Christian today It didn't hurt him. He didn't get into immorality, he didn't get into drugs. Our family has always been an excellent family. I saw a lot of these things happen. And I finally had to say, "there are a lot of things we don't know that we need to learn them from someone else." The attitude you going to associate with", there are people right seemed to be, "Armageddon's always going to come in couple years and they didn't need to be concerned about these problems because if they can Justcoast through they can make it." And that's not true. It doesn't happen. The end has been "just around the corner" for all of my life.
Bette: It's a band-aide approach.
Dale: And the band-aide approach at some point wears out. Now you can say "God's spirit is supposed to do that." I'm not saying that God's spirit can't do things, but there are various helps that we can give them as humans and there is expertise that we can apply that is available that we don't do, Witnesses do not do. Now if you say they do it, I don't know where it is that they do it, but they sure didn't do it in any congregation I've ever been in.
Bette: What made me start thinking was mostly when this character who moved in [into our congregation] who was a real wheeler and dealer, and he got 30 people to pioneer, and what was the big shock to me was that those people began to lose their Christianity. They got harsh and judgmental, and the things they would say about the non-pioneers-- and the whole support system just tell apart - the love, the closeness...
Dale: That's the trouble with works-oriented systems...
Bette: And when I saw people actually forced to live it, and saw the rotten fruits, I thought, "What is the matter?" Because you recognize the tree by its fruits. Before that, I could say that if people would really do it, it would work. But then when they did it and the opposite happened, that was really something that was amazing.
Elder V: Well now you've just come up with a problem, and to some degree the problem still exists. Now how are you going to solve it? How are these people needing all this psychiatric help and love, and all this stuff that you say they needed, how are they going to get it? If you don't have an organization to get it done how are they going to get it?
Bette: There is a wonderful woman who lives across the street who is trained as a counselor and she has streams of people come into her house day and night. Her husband is a doctor, and they wear themselves out helping people and charging nothing. She was a minister's wife, and she knows Greek, she does all those things, but she is a really loving person. All that she asks people is that they find a special person, not a family member, and do something special for that person. Do something for someone else. They also help the poor and witness to the street people.
Dale: There are people like that out there.
Elder V: You're right, I won't argue that point.
Dale: You say. "Where are you going to go, who are on our street here; there are some very tine people.
Elder J: Within the last eight or ten years we have had four or five different articles in the Awake! and Watchtower on depression. Many of them bringing out that there are time when counseling is...
Dale: Yes, and it took Richard Wheelock jumping off the roof of Bethel to get that done. Did you know Richard?
Elder J: Yes. I knew Richard Wheelock.
Dale: So did I. I worked under him for three and a half years.
Elder J: When he was sick in the infirmary my son wheeled him about...
Dale: First time they finally changed their mind on something like that was when something happened to someone that was close enough to them. Isn't it a shame that it took that long?
Bette: And another thing, they cautioned in those articles that if it was a drug that they gave you, then it was ok, but if it was talk therapy. Then you have to be very, very careful.
Dale: I'll tell you another story that happened at Bethel. You know Russ Kurzen? Do you know Art Barnen? They both worked on the Bethel reception desk. They had a sister from over in Thailand who developed a psychiatric problem while she was going to Gilead. Several times she tried to jump oft the roof of Bethel. Did you know her?
Elder J: Yes, I knew her.
Dale: In the first place, they wouldn't send someone back to Thailand with her to take care of her, even though she begged for a plane ticket, or at least a companion. They sent her back by boat, by herself. She had another one of her seizures, she jumped overboard. What happened? When the word got back to Bethel and Russ Kerosene told somebody, he got called on the carpet and taken off his job for letting that out and letting the Bethel family know about it. When I was at Bethel there was a young man who developed diabetes. We didn't have a doctor there, and they wouldn't send him to a doctor or to a hospital. He Justgot so sick he couldn't get out of bed and go to work so they decided to send him home. Some of his friends thought. "He isn't going to make it home, he has to go all the way to Seattle on a bus." The least we could do for him was to help buy him an airline ticket. So about thirty of us got together and chipped in about five bucks apiece. My roommate took it down to the Bethel office and said We've got a little money to put with the Society's money so Jack can have an airline ticket home. That way we know he'll get there." And they told my roommate that he'd better get right back up there and give every penny of the money back. The Society had decided how he was going home, and we had taken up a collection; and evening that nobody's perfect. No person is perfect, that was unscriptural. Well, they took the poor kid down to the bus. He was practically in a diabetic coma; they had to put him in the bus because he couldn't figure out which one to get on. We didn't hear from him for almost a year. They picked him up in a drunk tank somewhere down in Iowa, and some police officer recognized that he was sick and put him in a hospital. He had been living on skid row for six months. His one living relative was worried sick about him, nobody knew where he was. Finally he recovered enough to write his friends that he was ok. Is that caring? And that was before the sister lumped off the ship. But it's the same story. Do they ever learn?
Elder J: There were several who came from Thailand, because I was in Thailand. There were several other sisters from Thailand in her Gilead class. Because of her condition they kept her for a number of months longer so she could rest and recuperate. I know Brother Franz was personally involved trying to help her.
Bette: But since she requested an airline ticket home, why didn't they do that? Or if they had to send her by boat, why didn't they send someone with her since she asked them to?
Elder J: I don't want to comment since I don't know all the circumstances, but I do know that it did happen because I was on the receiving end in Thailand at the time.
Bette: And then there was another case at a district assembly where babies were getting heat stroke and dying, and there were two doctors who were Witnesses working in first aid, and they went to chairman's office and asked them to please make a public announcement to the effect, "Mothers, don't leave your babies in the sun, don't let them sleep, don't leave them there. They could get seriously overheated and die." And they were told that the assembly program was too precious to be used for personal announcements.
Dale: I don't necessarily see these people as uncaring or unloving. I see a system that says that the message, the work, is more important than people.
Bette: And refuses to take responsibility, because everything is under God's direction.
Dale: Real Christianity is people-oriented, it's just loving people. And when an organization's dictates, or requirements, or agendas get in the way of people loving people and taking care of people, then something is off track. Now I realize this doesn't happen all the time, it doesn't happen everywhere, it doesn't happen to every person. But there is enough of it to cause me to wonder if this is really the exclusive organization of God, the only one God uses...
Elder D: But we've already acknowledged earlier in the evening that nobody's perfect, no person is perfect, no individual, not any organization. And then you've picked a few situations out of a hat…
Dale: Of course, the same thing can happen in any organization.
Bette: But, if any organization claims to be God's exclusive channel in the world, then they're taking on a lot of responsibility.
Elder D: But when is somebody responsible for any thing? My comment is that you are responsible for something or it becomes a sin to you if you are aware of it. Some people are hurt by this. Some people are not. Some people experience one thing in life, and say, "well, I believe this is a necessary thing." Most people don't need to see the track record of anything to believe. And quite frankly, watching the Society move for several decades. I've noticed that they've made changes conservatively, although not always quickly. But they've made changes conservatively as they see in God's Word because a lot weight on them. It's a faith they can stand on. Or if they get too liberal, people will take it and run with it, I've found that to be...
Dale: Then you haven't really made Christians out of them. If you have to say, "you can't give them an inch because they'll take a mile," you're saying these people are really not well intentioned and you can't trust them to be good.
Bette: It also means it's a legalistic system based on human rules, and it's not going to work right, because it's the Holy Spirit that produces the fruit-ages within the Christian, not the organization.
Elder D: People are still by nature followers. Because, by and large, of the majority, very few would have the inclination or the desire or expertise to be a leader, quite frankly. That's partly just due to human nature.
Dale: Well, the problem, of course, is that the wrong people often have the desire to lead. It's true, I've seen that happen. I used to tell people "I don't know why in the world anybody would want to be an elder." It's a lot of work. A lot of work in helping people. I remember spending hours and hours, and getting called out in the middle of the night back in 1976 to pull somebody's wife out of a bar or somebody's husband out of somebody else's bedroom. That was back during what we came to call the "class of '75". I was so busy during that time that I didn't have time to think. But it made me start thinking afterward. But when you see so much piling up, you have to start asking questions. Here's another thing I began to see. Elders are supposed to be "appointed by holy spirit." How many times have you sat in an elder's meeting and they were going through the list, and somebody's name comes up and they want to make an elder out of him. I re member numerous cases. And I would say, "now wait a minute, look at his family. He does not have a loving relationship with his wife." Now between two dedicated Christians that's the first place love shows up, isn't it, within the family, the closest relationship we have? If he hasn't got it in his family life, you'd better look very carefully. Yet how many times I'd hear, "Hey, look, he's putting in 20 hours per month." I don't care about his hours.
Elder J: That's where the holy spirit comes in...
Dale: But he got appointed.
Elder J: Well, if you ignore those requirements set forth by the holy spirit...
Dale: But then when it goes up to New York, to the governing body, and the five men on the service committee pray about h, does holy spirit tip them off? They're the ones who make the appointment and that's who the holy spirit comes through, it doesn't come through the elders, they just make a recommendation.
Bette: What about that communist spy who became a District Overseer in East Germany?
Elder J: Paul counseled Timothy not to "lay his hands hastily on another man
Dale: Absolutely right, and yet they do it all the time. How about the case we heard about from the Circuit Overseer here in California. A Circuit Overseer visiting a congregation got a sister pregnant. She went and confessed to the elders, naming the Circuit Overseer. They went to him and he said, "No, that wasn't me." He lied about it, but they disfellowshipped her mostly for "lying" about him.
Elder D: With how many witnesses?
Dale: None, except her. But they did it anyway. But here's the hooker...
Elder D: Well, we can't help that...
Dale: Right, of course. I know you can't help that. But that's not my point. Here's what happened. They disfellowshipped her and not having the required witnesses, he went on his merry way. She did her time in the back of the hall with the bag over her head, the standard procedure, and eventually got reinstated. The Circuit Overseer continued to serve and was eventually appointed as a District Overseer. Fifteen years later he came back to the same area, and here was this sister, reinstated, and on the stage at the Circuit Assembly with her 15 year old son who is the spitting' image of the District Overseer. And it got to him and he admitted his sin, and he resigned or was removed, or whatever. So my brother-in-law said, "Well, you see, God's spirit took care of the problem." Fifteen years later! Well, ok, but how can you explain to me how Holy spirit can appoint a man like that to a higher position, living in sin? My brother-in-law said, "Well maybe he was doing more good than harm." Well, come on, you can't fool the Holy spirit, but Jehovah's Witnesses do a pretty good job of it. I know of a case where an elder left his wife ran off with a sister and was disfellowshipped. They both moved clear across the country. Someone knocked on his door, and he said, "Oh sure, I want to study the Bible." He studied, got baptized. He became a ministerial servant, then he became an elder. Finally the Circuit Overseer from his old area happened to get transferred up there and walked in and recognized him, years later. Now, where was the holy spirit? You've got to ask these questions.
Elder D: Back in the time of the Apostles, Annanias and Saphira played false to the Holy spirit...
Dale: How long did it take them? How long did it take them?
Elder D: Well, it would be nice if we had the opportunity to take the life force out of them for doing that sort of thing, but, quite frankly, we don't have that power, and nobody does today.
Bette: Then why assume the same authority that the Apostles had? No human organization today can safely do that.
Elder D: Timothy made appointments and he was not an apostle.
Bette: But they had apostles with those groups then, but for an organization to make the sort of claims that they do...
Elder D: . . . they worked as a support group for those in the community in the first century.
Dale: But it's the authoritarian control, though it doesn't appear in the New Testament, it doesn't appear in the early church of the first couple of centuries, and it isn't until the later part of the second and early third that you start running into this sort of thing, it's the iron-clad control over peoples minds that causes them to stop thinking.
Elder V: Well, it may very well be as you said, but if that's the way it seemed to me, I'd want out. I would not want to be associated- I don't care how many kids of mine. How many relatives- with an attitude like you two have. Go on, get out
Bette: I have in fact had to say good-bye to my mother and brother, and I'm willing to do that because my integrity to Jehovah is more important. But at the same time, reading the Bible, I feel that the way Jehovah's Witnesses handle shunning is unscriptural, and I'm not about to cooperate in an unscriptural application which keeps me from carrying out my scriptural obligations.
Elder D: I'm aware of your views - some religious organizations do exercise mind control. Nonetheless it was our earnest intention to see if there wasn't some point we could find some positive thing. I've done some work or researching your letter. It's not completed, but some day I would like to share it with you.
Bette: That's what I would like to see.
Elder D: But, quite frankly, that doesn't stop our... quite frankly, one of the things that I used to say to people is that when people are positive about the way they feel, and you can call it control of information, thought control...
Bette: Mind control.
Elder D: Yes, I've studied mind control too, I went to some higher education, but I had some opportunity to see how it works, the deprogramming and so forth1 so I'm familiar with how it works, and your correlation to the Watchtower Society and the way it deals with people, even though some of the essential ingredients are similar, in no way are they the same. What draws us together, there's a bond of love based upon our mutual affection for our father in heaven. Quite frankly, I would have a hard time believing that the first century Christians were not operating similarly [to JW's] despite what you've been saying. Quite frankly, they were well defined, there was usually one in every community.
Dale: They were autonomous.
Elder D: No, they were not.
Dale: You need to read some history.
Elder D: When one was disfellowshipped by one congregation, they were also viewed in the same position somewhere else, and that's not autonomous.
Dale: There's only one place in the Scriptures that talk about it...
Elder J: One congregation sends a letter and it is distributed.. ..[He is talking about the Corinthian Letters being circulated]
Dale: Well, after the fact, it was only 2 months later.
Elder D: How many examples do you need?
Dale: Well, it was the congregation's responsibility to do it.
Elder D: Jehovah's Witnesses congregations are somewhat autonomous...
Dale: Oh, no no no no no
Elder D: Well, that's your view -- that's your view. You must realize that the time must come....
Dale: Well, upon what scriptural basis would you base that on?
Elder D: You know exactly.
Dale: No, you tell me, what scripture, I want to hear it from you!
Elder D: You understand.
Dale: Have I slandered? Have I committed adultery? Have I bowed down to an idol? That's 1st Corinthians. Do you have a basis there?
Elder D: The charges brought against you are for apostasy
Dale: And that's being an anti-Christ, right? Have I denied that Jesus came in the flesh?
Bette: Or that he is the Son of God?
Dale: Or that he died for our sins?
Elder D: No.
Dale: That's right, I haven't. You haven't proven me Scripturally wrong on the questions I've raised. You've just disagreed with what I've said. I may be wrong on some doctrinal point, but I know where I stand with Jesus Christ.
Elder D: The long and the short of it will be, quite frankly, not whatever action this group takes, but what happens in the long run as far as all of our everlasting future is concerned.
Dale: I'm very sure of that.
Elder D: And you need to be, quite frankly, you need to be... .there will be quite a number of Jehovah's Witnesses, quite frankly, who will not survive...
Dale: What are you going to do when those people who were living in 1914 are dead and gone? There's not many left.
Elder J: Well, I guess we'll know pretty soon who is right.
_________________________________________________________________________
The meeting ended shortly thereafter, with the usual promise, "We will get back to you with our decision. It is not hard to imagine what that will be. For the record, I will say that these men conducted themselves amicably throughout the discussion, and at the end, thanked us for being pleasant. That is not normally the case where "apostasy" is concerned. In fact, lam surprised that they even allowed themselves to hear some of the points we presented. However, they seemed deathly afraid to tackle the challenge that chronology presents to their entire belief system. I think that on some deeper level, they must know, or at least suspect the truth. It is a difficult matter for one to face, and they have been well trained in denial.
For those of you reading this who have never been Witnesses, you might wonder why not just resign and avoid all of this? It has to do with the Witness practice of shunning. What started out as a way to express congregational disapproval of immorality, has degenerated into a "political weapon" to quell dissent, or questions of Biblical interpretation. They are deathly afraid of any information that might upset the "lock-step" unity of thought and action" mind-set of the Witness ranks. When one is disfellowshipped, or officially "disassociates" himself, he is treated as an anti-Christ in accordance with 2 John 10,11. While we can endure the loss of our many Witness friends, these can be replaced, being cut off by one's immediate family members can be tragic -- not only for us, but also for children, parents, grandparents, and grandchildren. For these are forced to deny their natural feelings and bend to the will of the organization, believing that "God wants them to." When one considers that many families around the world who have been touched by this practice, the broken marriages, the dismembered families, the psychological trauma which in many cases had lead to suicide, one can begin to appreciate the truly evil nature of this phenomena. And all because one has chosen to follow the dictates of his conscience.
Although the early Christians did, on occasion, discipline members of the congregation who were grossly immoral, there is no evidence that they used the practice to control and hold onto their members. Jesus said that his followers would be the ones cast out, not the ones doing the casting out. It is our hope that one day soon a way will be found to stop this unchristian practice. -
70
Transcript Of Judicial Committee Meeting Of Dale & Bette Baker
by Bangalore intranscript of judicial committee meeting of dale & bette baker.. http://www.jehovahswitnessbooks.com/2010/03/judicial-committee-meeting-of-dale.html.
bangalore.
.
-
Bangalore
Elder D: Now I probably haven't called on every home in our community, but I've come close; but quite frankly1 people just don't have a concern for, I won't say that none do, but quite frankly, if they do, one thing I've always found is that if someone has a genuine interest in spiritual things, regardless of who you are, if you get this out [Bible], they'll talk. They're afraid of it. Most people are afraid of it because they have no understanding of it, and they may have some fear in the back of their heart that it is God's word..
Bette: Well, I used to run into people who knew the Bible, but sometimes they would quote that Scripture in 2nd John about bringing another gospel, and they would feel that they could not invite me in. And I have tried to explain to several people that, in that day, the traveling evangelists would go and be put up in people's homes. And so it was talking about the Gnostics - "don't put them up in your home and feed them." It doesn't mean you can't invite them in and talk to them if they have a different belief.
Dale: Some churches teach that. I agree, though, that only a small majority of the population are really interested in the Bible on a deep level. But since when should we ever expect true Christians to be in the majority in the world? The Bible tells us that. It's always been that way.
Elder V: That's why Jesus said that narrow is the road to life and few are the ones finding it." So if you're going to look for any organization, the "few" is the place to look. Not the majority, look for the few.
Bette: Every religion - like the Mormons, and the Moonies - every religion claims that same type of thing, and that's not the identity.
Elder V: Well no, that's not the identity, but that's the place to start looking, where there's few.
Dale: I don't think that's a criteria, but you're right, there are not that many people who are interested and are going to become Christians. That's just a sad fact of life. Jesus died for all, but not all are going to avail themselves of it.
Bene: I know that every once in awhile I would run into someone at the door, and it would be unsettling to me because I recognized that they knew Jesus better than I did. And I had to discount that - it wasn't "real". Your belief system says it can't be, therefore you deny it. But it was true.
Elder V: There's a lot of things going on, they talk Christ and they say they know him, but they get caught up in emotion.
Dale: How do you know that they aren't Christians? I mean, you can't judge the house servant of another. Now there are some matters you can judge in a congregation; immorality and things like that. If someone wants to be a part of the congregation and wants to live with someone else's wife, then you have to take care of that. There's no question about that. But the central doctrine of Christianity is not all that complicated, and you asked that question and I want to make one comment on that. You don't have to be a scholar to understand the Bible and to understand the message of Christ. But if you're going to be a teacher, and claim to be a teacher and teach others, you should be qualified. Now there are a great many things that would have been common knowledge to anyone living in the first century that I daresay most of us have no knowledge of whatever. First of all is the Greek language; second, the culture; third, the history. [The early Christians knew all of that without specialized education.] The Bible has to be understood in the context of the times in which it was written. There is a place for scholars.
Bette: Otherwise you are reading present culture back into it...
Dale: Yes, and that's what I see so many religions doing. They say, "Well this is the way we do it today, so that must have been the way they did it back then."
Elder D: We don't do that.
Dale: Well, I'm not so sure.
Elder V: How long did it take them to figure out how congregations ought to be organized?
Elder D: There are very few that ever did.
Bette: And then that doesn't account for a lot of Paul's activities and lot of Peter's. There's a lot of things that the apostles and some who were not apostles did, that if a Witness overseer or elder did today, they'd have his hide for that, and yet the early Christians didn't operate that way at all. I noticed a lot of those things just reading the Bible But on the one hand, you say you don't need to be a scholar, but on the other hand you're saying that people cannot just read the Bible anywhere and get the truth out of it, they need your organization.
Elder D: But Romans says that there is a need for teachers, you do agree with that, don't you?
Bette: Well people need to know about Jesus Christ and what he did, that's what Philip did, all he filled him in on was some history.
Elder D: No, that man had a lot of knowledge. He was a Jewish proselyte.
Bette: Well, he knew the law, and all Philip needed to do was to tell him what Jesus did to fulfill it. He gave him some information he lacked. Big deal.
Elder D: Well, quite frankly, that in itself was a big deal. They were looking for the Messiah.
Dale: But how do you account for the Gentiles who were converted in a very short time? Cornelius - he wasn't a Jew?
Elder D: To a large degree they had miracles to help in the establishment of a personal relationship...
Dale: But one's personal conversion didn't necessarily have to do with a miracle, at least not in the case of Cornelius.
Elder D: No, not necessarily....
Elder V: It's heart condition, he was ready for a change.
Bette: Now here's the thing. The Watchtower says that when Moses was given the law he had the miracles to prove that he was from God. And then when God began using the Christian congregation they had the miracles to show that God had changed his dealings. So now if you've got a new gospel, which you say is different from what has been preached for the last two thousand years, then by all means if God's going to make that radical a change then there ought to be miracles to prove that, because it's a new gospel. They themselves [The Watchtower] have admitted that it's not the same gospel In fact Galatians says that if you teach a different gospel you're under a curse.
Elder J: The only new thing about it...
Bette: The two-class system...
Elder J: No, the only thing that's different is we feel that the kingdom began when Christ began his reign from 1914 onward.
Dale: The proof of that assertion is what I have challenged. Why doesn't anybody want to refute that challenge? I know of a number of different research programs done by Witnesses into that question of why does history give 587 BC and why does the Watchtower give 607. There's been any number of independent studies into this question. I read one the other day that I wish I could let you guys read, but I wouldn't dare cause I don't want to blow the guy's cover. He's a prominent elder somewhere in these United States. The research that he did was incredible. He attacked it from a slightly different approach than Carl Jonsson, but it's just as valid. And the Society didn't do anything about it. I guess it's because it didn't show up in anybody's mailbox. He ended his letter by characterizing the Society's approach to the evidence for 1914 by likening it to an old man who goes to a pick-and-choose banquet, but has forgotten his teeth. He will only pick what he is sure he won't choke on. And that's they way they pick their facts and figures when it comes to history. I mean, he actually said that stuff.
Bette: And he said that "we have this time bomb ticking away and it won't go away just by climbing into bed and pulling the covers over our heads."
Dale: He said, "I don't want another surprise", he was talking about 1975, he said, "I've already had one bad surprise, and I don't want another one. And this is going to happen."
Elder V: And why doesn't he get out?
Dale: Because he's probably got kids, he's probably got a wife, probably got a mother, and a grandmother and he doesn't want to be treated like an outcast.
Elder V: Then if the Society's right then he's a dead man anyway.
Dale: I don't think he's a dead man. And he'll probably get out one of these days. Anyway the point is, there has been a lot of research on this, and the Society will not attack this problem in the open. They will not give an honest up-front, above board consideration of the evidence against their theory. They won't do it. Why?
Elder V: Well if my memory doesn't fail me the Society has registered the chronology of other people, other organizations.
Dale: Show me where they have given a dissertation or done anything like Paul did on questions like resurrection. Show me where they have honestly considered the information.
Bette: And refuted it.
Dale: I mean, most Witnesses are not even aware of how strong the evidence for 587 is for the fall of Jerusalem, and there's a real easy way, you don't have to say "we follow the Bible", that's garbage; because the 70 years can be shown to be "for Babylon", not for Jerusalem. And most scholars recognize it. And it works out to the year. In fact you can have an exact 70 year period for Babylon if you start with 609 which is the year that the Assyrian empire was effectively overrun by Nebuchadnezzar's father Nabopolassar, and there are no discrepancies of more that a year, and these can be answered by correlating the methods of counting reigns in the various empires. And there are astronomical diaries that fix exactly Nebuchadnezzar's thirty-seventh year. It fits with Egyptian history, it fits with Persian history, and it fits with Grecian history. It all hangs together so well.
Bette: It fits with all the dates in the Bible where Egyptian and Babylonian events are mentioned.
Dale: And why the Society won't look into this thing, well, I know why they won't. It blows their 1914 date, that's the casualty. But everything else works. It fits with history, it fits with the Bible, and it fits with everything else. Now, you can say, I'm going to stick with the Bible, I'm not going to pay any attention to secular historians." Now, you have that information I gave you about George Storrs, how he did the same thing with the seventy weeks, which cuts about a hundred years of history out. Many fundamentalists today say, "the earth was made in six literal days," Well, you don't agree with that, because the evidence obviously proves that false. So to say "I'm going to take the Bible" [over secular history is an admirable thing, but if the Bible itself gives you an answer, why not accept that answer? And I think it does very well. And these are questions that really strike at the heart of the authority of the organization, any organization. And why don't they come out in the open and answer these things? They haven't. Why don't they? "If you have the truth, what is there to be afraid of?" That's right out of the Truth book. That's what we used to say to people. When people would tell us, "My minister says I'd better not talk to you because you might mislead me." "Oh no, all we want to do is read the Bible to you, and if you have the truth, what is there to be afraid of? Have you said that to people? I'll bet you have. So if we have the truth, put it on the table and show me. They won't do it. And it has to do with the whole underpinnings of the authority structure. But that's important. If you misrepresent yourself.. You see, the Bible is where we get our authority. That's where anybody gets it. That's where the truth comes from. It's all we have. We don't have any succession of Popes, or Apostles, or anything like that. We can't trace our history back. The Catholics have tried it - it doesn't work. We can't trace ours back to any authority. We've got to get it from the Scriptures. And if you can't support that maybe there's something wrong. And that's where I'm at.
Elder D: I knew you had some problems from the first time I learned about your letter... in fact all three of us....
Dale: But if you had an interest… [in giving evidence]...
Elder D: Well quite frankly, we could get into a long drawn out question about history...
Bette: That's why I brought this notepad, because I figured if anybody had an answer to what Dale had written, I want to know about it. That's what I want to know, does anybody have any refutation? [Bette shows them her blank notepad]....
Elder D: There are other points besides chronology that would indicate who true Christians are. The Bible says they would have love amongst themselves. And quite frankly, I have experienced, and I would be shocked and surprised if you hadn't experienced, a lovable Jehovah's Witness, having love for one another. How would you explain that?
Bette: I have met people who are more loving.
Dale: That is not to say that some of Jehovah's Wit nesses are not loving. However, their love is hooked up to a switch in New York.
Bette: It can be highly conditional. And that smacks of mind-control. However I will have to say that in the last 10 years it has gotten worse. Once they got scared and had no answer, it has really gotten bad. Thirty-five years ago, that would be 1952, if they had taken the position that they do now, I would have recognized it as unchristian and run the other way. At that time they said, "if we have the truth we have nothing to fear" in looking into, or reading anything else. At that time we weren't worried if someone had written anything about us.
-
70
Transcript Of Judicial Committee Meeting Of Dale & Bette Baker
by Bangalore intranscript of judicial committee meeting of dale & bette baker.. http://www.jehovahswitnessbooks.com/2010/03/judicial-committee-meeting-of-dale.html.
bangalore.
.
-
Bangalore
Elder J: Let just take a look at one other scripture and that is Hebrews 10:25,26, about associating together and encouraging one another all the more so as you behold the day drawing near." Now you haven't associated a whole lot in the last several years, now I'm wondering if you feel that that's unnecessary or if you fulfill that in some other way, or…
Dale: I know a number of good Christians, I talk to them a lot associate with them. I feel that I am doing that in a way that is meaningful.
Elder J: As far as there being any organized...
Dale: I seriously doubt that I'll ever join another organization...
Elder J: The entire association of our brothers is organized for work and certainly the entire religious family of Jehovah's people, certainly there are some bonds there...
Bette: If you're all a family, how is h that only a few of you are sons of God?
Elder D: We will all eventually be sons of God.
Bette: Yes, in a thousand and some years. Why is it that Romans says that "all who are led by God's spirit are sons of God,' and in 1st John it says "by this we recognize the children of God and children of the devil?"
Elder D: We can get into all sorts of semantically arguments too. Every time the word son is mentioned it doesn't necessarily mean it's the same type of son.
Bette: But there's only two groups in 1st John, the children of God, and the children of the devil. If you aren't a child of God, what are you?
Elder D: Rom. 3:3[??] can be used to prove we are all sons of God.
Bette: But you're taking away the entire New Testament from people, so that they can't believe that God is speaking to them.
Elder J: This is the mistake of false religious organizations, which claim Christianity. That everything in the Scriptures that talks about those that have the heavenly hope applies to everyone, and that all good people go to heaven and all of this. And here is where they have gone off the beam to start with.
Bette: But to take away something that God gives me, by a human organization, just to consolidate their own power, is not God's way of doing things. Besides that in Jeremiah he says "'Look there are days coming', is the utterance of Jehovah, 'and I will conclude with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah a new covenant; not one like the covenant that I concluded with their forefathers in the day of my taking hold of their hand to bring them forth out of the land of Egypt, which covenant of mine they themselves broke, although, I myself had husbandry ownership of them,' is the utterance of Jehovah. 'For this is the covenant that I shall conclude with the house of Israel after those days,' is the utterance of Jehovah. 'I will put my law within them, and in their heart I shall write it. And I will become their God, and they themselves will become my people... For I shall forgive their error, and their sin I shall remember no more.'" So if you're not in the new covenant, where is the forgiveness of sin?
Elder J: Those that are in the new covenant are the first to receive the benefits of that forgiveness of sin.
Bene: So meanwhile our sins are not forgiven, because according to this, we have to be in the new covenant.
Elder J: The new covenant is based on the ransom of Christ, and the forgiveness of sins is made possible through his blood like the Apostle John writes, "Not our sins only but also those of the whole world."
Dale: So that still doesn't answer the question, if you're not in the new covenant, how are your sins forgiven?
Elder J: The new covenant was made with spiritual Israel to make possible a class that would [bring this benefit] as a part of the seed. That was the purpose of the new covenant.
Dale: There is a problem with that argument, and that is that the seed of Abraham, according to Galatians chapter 3, is only one person, Christ Jesus, it's not 144,000.
Elder J: Paul says in verse 29 "if you belong to Christ, you are really Abraham's seed.
Dale: If you read the context it's really not hard to sort out, because Abraham's seed is used in several different senses. It's used in the sense of his natural progeny, right? Those who are his physical progeny are called Abraham's seed in Scripture. And then he says Christ Jesus is Abraham's seed, it's in the sense of a seed of promise. And that Christians are his seed in a spiritual sense, they are his spiritual progeny, you might say. The scripture is very clear when it says, "And not to seeds, as in the case of many such, but as in the case of one; and to your seed who is Christ."
Bette: Because he says earlier in that chapter "Now the Scripture, seeing in advance that God would declare people of the nations righteous due to faith, declared the good news beforehand to Abraham, namely: By means of you all the nations will be blessed. Consequently those who adhere to faith are being blessed together with faithful Abraham." So Paul gives the interpretation of that scripture about "by means of you the nations will be blessed" and says, "it is happening, we are being blessed." Those with a heavenly hope are receiving a blessing.
Dale: The Society's saying that the 144.000 are serving as a blessing, and that doesn't square with what I am reading here. I'm sorry, it just doesn't square.
Elder J: Now you're saying that the seed of Abraham in one verse isn't the same seed of Abraham in another verse.
Dale: Obviously it's not, time later in the middle 50's. Now being Abraham's
Elder J: Why would you say that? If you belong to Christ, then you are Abraham's seed.
Bette: And you get the blessing, you don't give the blessing, according to Paul.
Elder J: We all know that in Revelation 21 the bride of Christ, the New Jerusalem, the Lamb's wife represents the Kingdom class now united with him in heaven... It says that "there came forth a river of life from the throne and it came down the broad way of the city New Jerusalem to mankind on earth." Now the New Jerusalem, the city, is not a city, it is that body of Christ that is with him in the heavens, and through that family with Christ as its number one head, or husband as depicted in the illustration, with reference to what? Well through Christ, and those with him the blessings come to mankind.
Bette: How did those blessings come before they went to heaven in 1919?
Elder J: Certainly not all of them are in heaven yet.
Bette: Well, what I mean is, according to your theology, nobody went to heaven until 1919. How did all those nations get the blessings meanwhile for the last 2000 years?
Elder J: The blessings are not spoken of as blessings, but air and water and food that we eat...
Bette: But it says "Let anyone who wishes come and take life's waters freely.. So they're all Christians.
Elder J: The reference there is the blessings to flow and benefits of Christ's ransom that begin flowing in connection the kingdom paradise.
Bette: According to your theology, yes, but that's taking a piece of a scripture here and a piece of a scripture there. You're using a particular interpretation of a scripture as though it were proof. I find it much better to take the scriptures verse by verse.
Elder J: Well let's go a step further. Genesis 3:16 speaks of a seed, the same seed that later Abraham was told would come through his name. Now in Revelation Jesus speaks to those in that heavenly class [3:26,271 he says, "I will give him an iron rod and let him shepherd the nations." So they would share in the dispensing action which Christ Jesus brings upon the earth. So they are a means for the earth, together with Christ, for bringing that destruction that is referred to, and as far as Satan's complete destruction we know that the angel that comes down to bind Satan is Christ Jesus. Certainly those of his kingdom class are sharers in his experiences and sharers in his kingdom with him, so the idea of their being part of that kingly secondary part, nonetheless part of the body of Christ united with him, I can't see where there is any...
Dale: It still conflicts with the seed being only "one person who is the Christ." He wrote this quite some time later in the middle 50's. Now being Abraham's seed in a spiritual sense would mean being part of spiritual Israel, which relates to Abraham due to the promise. You can look at it in that way. For you to arbitrarily say that being Abraham's seed makes them part of the seed which refers to Christ - that's not what that Scripture says...
Bette: But, mostly, in the 3rd chapter of Galatians in the 9th verse where Paul gives the interpretation of "by means of you all the nations will be blessed", they [Watchtower] interpret that to mean that the Christians of his day were giving the blessing, but he says, "consequently those who adhere to faith are being blessed." It doesn't say, "you will bless the nations." It says you "are being blessed." That's Paul's interpretation of "by means of you all the nations will be blessed." He says they are receiving the blessing, and then in verse 16 he says, "Now the promises were spoken to Abraham and to his seed. It says, not: 'And to seeds,' as in the case of many such. But as in the case of one: 'And to you seed', who is Christ."
Elder J: And then in the 29th verse there "Moreover, if you belong to Christ, you are really Abraham's seed, heirs with reference to a promise." So they become heirs to the same promise that Jesus is heir of.
Dale: Well, I can't agree with that. (Making them part of the "seed" that does the blessing)
Elder J: They're joint heirs with Christ. The Scripture says that.
Dale: Abraham was the father of the literal nation of Israel. He was also the father in a sense of spiritual Israel. But to say that Spiritual Israel is the same as the seed of promise who is Christ Jesus -- Paul has to be using a different connotation of "seed" there, because he limits it to one person; in black and white.
Bette: Notice what other translations say there: "And now that we are Christ's we are the true descendants of Abraham and all of God's promises continue on to us." "If you belong to Christ you are a true descendant of Abraham and true heirs of his promise." "Merely by belonging to Christ you are the posterity of Abraham, the heirs to his promise." "If you belong to Christ then you are descendants of Abraham and will receive his promise."
Elder D: The Bible was written to common people. They weren't scholars of their day. They were fishermen, common people. And with the complicity of theology, how does anyone find the truth? How many thousands of people pray, "help me understand this", and they come up with nothing. They come up with nothing because they need to be directed in their thinking and their understanding. [Discussion continues about lack of spiritual understanding of people locally]. I may not have called on as many doors as you have, since 1948, but I have talked to thousands, with the real intent of helping them understand the Bible. That's been my purpose in calling. Now, I don't know where you've found all these Christians, and a true knowledge of [.?.] but when it comes right down to understanding the Bible, or reading it, or receiving [?1 from it,... it's hard to find people who do.
Dale: Well, I'll grant you that.