Maybe those Tories are getting advice from Frank Luntz.
Villabolo
according to this article:.
harpers government???
pu-leeease...harper is not even a ruling majority!.
Maybe those Tories are getting advice from Frank Luntz.
Villabolo
sorry i needed a place to vent.
i am just flaming to see idiocy in action and how emotions, suppositions, assumptions and conclussions without evidence will not control someones head, and thoughts if you can call it that.. i am usually very patient (thanks to my fing jw background) and i try to use rationale all the time.
but sometimes there is someone who would just refuse to think.
Murray Smith: "I ain't figured out how to bang my head against a brick wall successfully yet . . ."
A steel helmet; well cushioned on the inside; with a metal spike; might be of help.
Villabolo
disproving the date 1914 as a significant year in bible prophecy is of great importance to some (e.g.
carl o. jonsson).
along with the meticulous details of bible and secular chronology, broadening one's horizons when assessing exactly what this date represents when compared against the 6000 years of human history likewise has merit.
MeanMrMustard: "So far I haven't used any colorful four-letter words... that counts for something, right?"
I guess you're a better man than I am.
Villabolo
disproving the date 1914 as a significant year in bible prophecy is of great importance to some (e.g.
carl o. jonsson).
along with the meticulous details of bible and secular chronology, broadening one's horizons when assessing exactly what this date represents when compared against the 6000 years of human history likewise has merit.
MeanMrMustard: " *shrugs*... I don't think I was that mean... was I?
On second thought, that dog looks like it was nipping at your heels.
Villabolo
disproving the date 1914 as a significant year in bible prophecy is of great importance to some (e.g.
carl o. jonsson).
along with the meticulous details of bible and secular chronology, broadening one's horizons when assessing exactly what this date represents when compared against the 6000 years of human history likewise has merit.
Please don't be so mean with Spade Mr. Mustard
Villabolo
http://news.yahoo.com/s/digitaltrends/nasascientistfindsevidenceofalienlife.
that astonishingly awesome claim comes from dr. richard b. hoover, an astrobiologist at nasas marshall space flight center, who says he has found conclusive evidence of alien life fossils of bacteria found in an extremely rare class of meteorite called ci1 carbonaceous chondrites.
(there are only nine such meteorites on planet earth.
Proof of alien life!
Amazing image captured by the Hubble telescope!
It is however, of questionable intelligence
Villabolo
disproving the date 1914 as a significant year in bible prophecy is of great importance to some (e.g.
carl o. jonsson).
along with the meticulous details of bible and secular chronology, broadening one's horizons when assessing exactly what this date represents when compared against the 6000 years of human history likewise has merit.
Ah, Spade, could you puhleeese, pretty puhleeese answer my question about the relevancy of this 1914 prophecy as it relates to the next 100 years? Remember, there's no timeframe anymore since the Faithless and Indescrete Master (Class) was forced to stretch it out indefinitely (Too many old people dying).
Villabolo
this is a trivial concern but perhaps people here know the answer.
northern european countries never named their children jesus.
it would be considered gauche and heretical.
Band on the Run: "Yet Latinos regularly use Jesus as a Christian name. Does anyone know why?"
I'm Latino and yet I don't have a clue. In my experience it doesn't seem Cubans have that habit but Mexicans do.
In any case, the name was not unique in Israel. It is the English version of Yeshua (in Hebrew) or Joshua (A direct translation from Yeshua).
Villabolo
disproving the date 1914 as a significant year in bible prophecy is of great importance to some (e.g.
carl o. jonsson).
along with the meticulous details of bible and secular chronology, broadening one's horizons when assessing exactly what this date represents when compared against the 6000 years of human history likewise has merit.
Spade:
Spade: Add the fulfillment of the 1914 prophecy
What fulfillment? It's already been brought out that:
Dude, you need to have Deuteronomy 18 fulfilled against you!
21 And if thou say in thy heart, How shall we know the word which Jehovah hath not spoken?
22 when a prophet speaketh in the name of Jehovah, if the thing follow not, nor come to pass, that is the thing which Jehovah hath not spoken: the prophet hath spoken it presumptuously, thou shalt not be afraid of him.--Deuteronomy 18:21, 22 American Stanrd Version
Villabolo
disproving the date 1914 as a significant year in bible prophecy is of great importance to some (e.g.
carl o. jonsson).
along with the meticulous details of bible and secular chronology, broadening one's horizons when assessing exactly what this date represents when compared against the 6000 years of human history likewise has merit.
One more time!
Never mind the fact that everything predicted for 1914, by the Studies in the Scriptures, was stood on its head. Since you say it fulfills Bible prophecy, then tell us what significance does this prophecy have for the next 100 years? 200 years?
And please don't tell me that this "system of things" will not last that long, because nothing in the re-conditioned Watchtower prophecy (Its eternally elastic "generation".) gives a time frame from 1914 to Armageddon. Therefore, any statement you make about the end being near will be your own understanding and not the Bible's.
Villabolo