But, there is absolutle no doubt that humans coexisted with dinosaurs.
Oh really?
Dr. Peterson is a graduate of the University of Minnesota College of Medicine and completed his residency in Family Medicine at the University of Oklahoma. He is a past president of the Oklahoma Academy of Family Physicians.
He had a full-time family practice in Edmond for over 26 years and is a past Chief of Staff of the Edmond Hospital. ... Dr. Peterson speaks regularly on subjects related to health and nutrition.
Ugh... not even verified not by a paleontologist - but by a family doctor. You've got to be kidding me.
Beyond that, I couldn't find any references to it in any published papers - and no carbon dating to verify it's age. According to talk.orgins, the finger was not found in situ (there is no matching hole in the rock formation to establish that where it was in the timeline). Someone basically found a something that looks kinda like a human finger laying on the ground somewhere, and a Family Medical Doctor took it on his buddies Christian radio show and said "Yep! I know it to be true! And the rock nearby has 60-million year old dinosaur footprints... so it MUST be as old as they are!"
No in depth testing, no peer review, nothing - for something that purports 'shakes the roots of evolution'. Just the opinion of a single nutritional expert.
There are of course other potential explanations - much better than family doctor Peterson can offer (being generally unfamiliar with anything except human anatomy), and not nearly so glamorous - that it could be a Ophiomorpha or Thalassinoides shrimp burrow.
Unless a finger was found completely encased in stone, it is highly unlikely that a whole human finger would be fossilized rather than just the bones anyway... making it further suspicious.
So... pretty weak, dude. If Peterson was so sure - he would have it peer reviewed and get that Nobel Prize.
- Lime