I address Almighty God as Father instead of by any personal name.
(This actually got me in trouble at the Kingdom Hall since certain ones considered it "apostate" not to say "Jehovah" in prayer -- go figure.)
just wondering of those that pray and who have left the organisation, do you still address god as jehovah?.
i think i'm currently in that awkward stage where i'm neither in or out, yet don't feel i should even address, or have the right, to talk to god (jehovah) until i decide where i sit.
so i'm wondering if it's hypocritical to pray and use his name.
I address Almighty God as Father instead of by any personal name.
(This actually got me in trouble at the Kingdom Hall since certain ones considered it "apostate" not to say "Jehovah" in prayer -- go figure.)
thought this one was quite creepy - the article to be studied january 11-17 "treasure your place in the congregation", page 13 para 5 reads (italics mine):.
"the spirit that now operates in the sons of disobedience" is so widespread that it is like the air we breathe.
(eph.
As a reminder "channel" is not a Biblical term and is more commonly found in connection with occult and spiritualistic mediums.
another gem from the same edition - article to be studied december 28 - january 3 (which most will miss lol coz of summer vacation) entitled "what do your prayers say about you?
" page 6 para 19 reads:.
19 when we are being represented in public prayer, we need to display reverential "fear of god.
I bet this opens up for more talmudic clarifications and regulations like their other rules ...
What constitutes an "embrace"? (Did the hand linger on the wife's back?) If I can discreetly hold hands with my wife, can our entire family hold hands during a prayer? What about those who are engaged?
... but more to the point -- where is ANY of this of this in SCRIPTURE?!
@Chalam
John 3:3 came to my mind -- JW's deny being born again (unless they are anointed)
2009 sing to jehovah lyrics--pdf----by request!
request from researcher: i heard about this file but never received a copy and wondered if you had it.
can i get a copy?
"Christ’s brothers are chosen and called. God gives them their own new birth. This bride class will share in the Kingdom And bring Paradise to this earth.
(CHORUS)Praise Jah for his holy Anointed."
[23:23] so friends, hypothetically, and i repeat, hypothetically, even if an angel were to come down here and land on this platform, today, at this moment, and to present something to us that didn't fit into the pattern of truth, what should we be ready to do?
we should be ready to say, " hold on there, that doesn't fit into the pattern, and i am not going to listen to it!
" yes, even if it were one of jehovah's angels.. .
As a sidepoint - I'm quite familiar with the talk. The watchtower article of the same name was used as the basis for the Presiding Overseer's extended, special "local needs" talk on the night I was DF'd on apostasy charges.
[23:23] so friends, hypothetically, and i repeat, hypothetically, even if an angel were to come down here and land on this platform, today, at this moment, and to present something to us that didn't fit into the pattern of truth, what should we be ready to do?
we should be ready to say, " hold on there, that doesn't fit into the pattern, and i am not going to listen to it!
" yes, even if it were one of jehovah's angels.. .
It seems like they are building on what Paul writes at Gal 1:8
"But even if we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel to you than what we have preached to you, let him be accursed."
The problem with the Watchtower interpretation is that over the course of their history they themselves have regulary changed their own pattern of Good News. By this token any time there is a new light, the JW should reject the WT as a the "voice of a stranger", since it changes the pattern of Good News that they have been preaching.
Here is one time I wasn't a squealer ...
We out in service with an elderly sister. Me and my buddy were sitting the backseat of her car when we noticed something of interest poking out from under her seat. When she went to the door with the other sister in the group we took a look and discovered some books on growing marijauna as well as a bag of pot. Needless to say we were shocked but we thought it was more funny than anything else and didn't rat her out.
I was a squealer when I was a teenager. I thought it was the right thing to do. So I contacted the elders of a nearby congregation with info that a teenage sister was having sex. They asked me to meet with them and her. I did so. She denied it. They asked why I would spread such a false charge. I, with bound volume photocopies in hand, told them I only was doing what the Society said to do. They said they were going to contact my elders and recommend a JC to examine the potential of charging me with slander/gossip. I was pretty upset so I went and told my elders the story. They said that there would be no JC against me but sternly told me the next time to come to them first before going to another congregations elders. I was naive and didn't know how the system worked and thought all elders were on the same page and had the same standards of conduct.
i can't take credit for this but here is a list of songs in the new songbook and comparisons to old songbook.. .
new song # and title old song # notes.
004 - making a good name with god 037.
"...ever loyal to our brothers
when they take the lead
when they give us clear direction
may our heart and mind give head"
more of the same