bohm

Joined

• started 191 topics
• posted 7,847 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by bohm

• 
  59

  Hmmm...I have a question

  by hmmmmmm in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  hi.. somethings seem weird.. for example - wages of sin is death - so if you sin you die, and if you die you have paid for that sin completely, so you have no more sin.

  .

  now what if everyone in the world was killed - by a nuclear domino effect - in theory we have saved everyone .... any ideas?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  bohm

  Perry: but YOU do not believe in the flying spaghetti monster right? and you dont think that makes you a supreme being of infinite wisdom to make that statement?
• 
  59

  Hmmm...I have a question

  by hmmmmmm in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  hi.. somethings seem weird.. for example - wages of sin is death - so if you sin you die, and if you die you have paid for that sin completely, so you have no more sin.

  .

  now what if everyone in the world was killed - by a nuclear domino effect - in theory we have saved everyone .... any ideas?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  bohm

  PERRY: Atheism posits "no God" . A person would have to be all powerful himself and look everywhere in the universe to make this a true statement.

  Serious question. Does your argument also apply to the flying spaghetti monster?
• 
  71

  A honest question to all creationists

  by bohm in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  hey!.

  i have a question regarding creation thats burning me.

  i dont have any clever arguments depending on what is answered, i am just curious.. first off i want to say that i think people are free to believe whatever they want.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  bohm

  HG: Thanks for continuing your input. About the species thing. As i understand your position, you are saying that you believe it is plausible that wolf and dogs have the same common ancestor because they are quite 'similar', but eg. a human and a ape do not because they are to 'different' (correct me if i am wrong).

  Now, my point is that i have never seen anyone point out exactly what gap between man and apes evolution cannot pass - ie. what property(ies) that definately seperate an ape from a human. Is it that we walk upright? is it our brain capacity? etc.

  To ask in a different way. When you see the the ancient skeletons that supposedly lies 'between' human and apes, what is your thoughts about them? Are all monkeys, all 'retarded' humans, or is there some property(ies) that allows you to draw a line and say THESE are all apes, THESE are all humans THEREFORE they proove nothing except variation within the human/ape 'group'.

  (lists of transitional forms)

  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_evolution

  http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/section1.html#morphological_intermediates_ex3
• 
  71

  A honest question to all creationists

  by bohm in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  hey!.

  i have a question regarding creation thats burning me.

  i dont have any clever arguments depending on what is answered, i am just curious.. first off i want to say that i think people are free to believe whatever they want.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  bohm

  ln: big bang also has plenty of problems, but if i had to put money on the question, i would choose it over steaty state theory.

  so the same two questions: if you had to bet 10 buck. where would you put them?
• 
  16

  JW Science Quote (1-29)

  by TD in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  if you've been exposed to american entertainment at all during the last forty years, it would be difficult to be unfamiliar with the sci-fi character, "mr.

  spock.

  " spock was a character in the series, star trek, the son of a "vulcan" father and a human mother.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  bohm

  TD: Excellent, well-researched article. your series deserve a lot more attention than they seem to get. Keep it up!
• 
  71

  A honest question to all creationists

  by bohm in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  hey!.

  i have a question regarding creation thats burning me.

  i dont have any clever arguments depending on what is answered, i am just curious.. first off i want to say that i think people are free to believe whatever they want.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  bohm

  HappyGuy: I was NOT trying to insult you. my sincere appolegies. A lot of people are not aware of these things - i was not just a few months ago. I had a point but i doubt it matters now. I was just trying to find common ground so i didnt talk below your level or above.

  and for the record i only knew about iridium isotopes in the TK-layer. the other stuff is new to me. that was what i was implying with my response to that post.
• 
  71

  A honest question to all creationists

  by bohm in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  hey!.

  i have a question regarding creation thats burning me.

  i dont have any clever arguments depending on what is answered, i am just curious.. first off i want to say that i think people are free to believe whatever they want.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  bohm

  HG: indeed it was!
• 
  71

  A honest question to all creationists

  by bohm in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  hey!.

  i have a question regarding creation thats burning me.

  i dont have any clever arguments depending on what is answered, i am just curious.. first off i want to say that i think people are free to believe whatever they want.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  bohm

  HappyGuy: i have to bite. you do know that the concept of 'species' is not a 100% set-in-stones definition like 'numbers' or 'an atom', rather there are a lot of different definitions. read the wikipedia article for more information.
• 
  71

  A honest question to all creationists

  by bohm in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  hey!.

  i have a question regarding creation thats burning me.

  i dont have any clever arguments depending on what is answered, i am just curious.. first off i want to say that i think people are free to believe whatever they want.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  bohm

  Okay, nice to see some more traffic on this topic!

  HappyGuy: I didnt imply anything by 'proud' except that i didnt feel being called an evolutionist was an insult. it was a joke. laugh!
  Regarding the tk-layer, the eye, the map and all - dont really have a lot to add which is on topic, but i feel you dont have access to all the info, particulary with regard to the tk layer (try to see what isotopes are in that layer and where they are also found). try to google this stuff. knowing both perspective wont hurt.

  quietlyleaving: i see your point, but many think the bible is compatible with evolution/no ark, and i feel those people allow themselves to be led more by evidence (or as an id advocate may say: popular oppinion). At any rate, it is not impossible to imagine a bible which supports both viewpoints, to some it allready exist. basically you just need to throw out genesis and make some statements more vague :-)
• 
  71

  A honest question to all creationists

  by bohm in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  hey!.

  i have a question regarding creation thats burning me.

  i dont have any clever arguments depending on what is answered, i am just curious.. first off i want to say that i think people are free to believe whatever they want.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  bohm

  TD: Hey, i allways refer to myself as an evolutionist, and a proud one is that!.

  Its a bit like when you have to address a homosexual. no matter what word you use, it allways feel slightly odd.