"Second off, its difficult to see what TMJW is arguing against, abiogenesiss or evolution."
I seriously doubt that your average creationist can tell the difference.
recently i read the following from themadjw's retarded website:.
"no one would claim that the simplest device- such as, say, a pen, could ever come about, given all eternity, by accident!".
wow!
"Second off, its difficult to see what TMJW is arguing against, abiogenesiss or evolution."
I seriously doubt that your average creationist can tell the difference.
recently i read the following from themadjw's retarded website:.
"no one would claim that the simplest device- such as, say, a pen, could ever come about, given all eternity, by accident!".
wow!
"it is *not* a given thing it would happend in a finite-time universe, such as ours."
I never said our universe had infinite time.
Edit: Also I'm not sure your concept of taking a sample of an infinite time period is possible. Our concept of pretty much anything breaks down when infinity is considered. In fact, "infinity" may not even be possible in our universe or any other.
However, many of these people like to use words like "eternity", "eternal", and "forever". I was trying to combat these terms.
recently i read the following from themadjw's retarded website:.
"no one would claim that the simplest device- such as, say, a pen, could ever come about, given all eternity, by accident!".
wow!
Recently I read the following from themadjw's retarded website:
"No one would claim that the simplest device- such as, say, a pen, could EVER come about, given all Eternity, by ACCIDENT!"
Wow! Somehow it manages to be wrong in the first paragraph!
Actually, it could. An infinite amount of time would imply infinite probability. Infinite probability means that every single thing possible would occur eventually. And since you're speaking about eternity here the word "eventually" becomes meaningless.
Thus given eternity, a pencil would be sure to happen by "accident"(though real accidents don't happen in a universe that is under the influence of cause and effect).
This seems to be a recurrent argument with creationists and so I figured I'd try to bust this one open.
Thank you for your time.
externally, we get a certain 'impression' of what living in england is like.
every third baby boy is named mohammed.
people who engage in self defense are imprisoned while criminals are given a 'firm talking to' and have their hands slapped.
I stopped reading when I came to the part about UFOs.
one of my jwd friends on facebook just posted this link which i think is quite interesting, it's a blog which is aimed at outing apostates on facebook:.
http://witnesswatchdog.blogspot.com/?spref=fb.
the blog also have a little information on madjw, not that i think it's reliable but it's there..
*My face when I read that blog
"so is the nearness of armageddon from jehovah's perspective or from ours?".
"why is the majority of the memorial talk dedicated to bringing in more members?".
"who were the true worshipers of jehovah in the 17 hundred year gap prior to russel?".
"So is the nearness of armageddon from Jehovah's perspective or from ours?"
"Why is the majority of the memorial talk dedicated to bringing in more members?"
"Who were the true worshipers of Jehovah in the 17 hundred year gap prior to Russel?"
"If God is almighty why didn't he just snap his fingers and prevent the Israelites from having to participate in wars with other nations?"
*Show the JW any writings from Russel about pyramids* "What does this mean?"
"If Satan is the greatest terrorist in history why does Jehovah feel he has to respond to his claims? Isn't that a form of negotiation?"
"Why do Satan and Jehovah refrane from all measurable contact with Humans?"
The above are all questions that have confused all the Witnesses that I've asked them to. Of course, the Jdubs then go ahead and either change the subject or tell me to wait on Jehovah
So what are some questions you've seen make JW's a little uncomfortable?
i don't know who said this one:.
"there's never been a kingdom given to so much bloodshed as that of christ.".
i think that statement is beyond dispute.. farkel.
To everyone who isn't aware: Nukes kept us from going to war with the Soviet Union.
Sad emo, I didn't say that it's prevented all war.
Oops. Apparently I said something that was worthy of removal(somehow).
Out of all seriousness, it should be pretty obvious that Spike is a troll.
removed by admin
i don't know who said this one:.
"there's never been a kingdom given to so much bloodshed as that of christ.".
i think that statement is beyond dispute.. farkel.
"or killing us all with "weapons of mass destruction""
Perhaps if you read any books other than the Bible you would realize that those "weapons of mass destruction" are the one thing that has kept humanity out of countless wars and bloodshed.
Why was there no world war 3? Nukes.