We have increased quality of life by fighting nature.
Jan,
"Nature" is the result of the evolutionary process. What sense does it make in fighting the result of the very process which developed life on this planet?
That something happens in nature doesn't make it good (ask any patient with an infectuous disease).
I did not say it was good, I said that this process has been considered beneficial, good for the species.
Scientists believe we can make it better for ourselves through the abilities evolution has gives us.
Maybe there are greater abilities to come from evolution if scientists would just let evolution continue on its natual course.
It is a massive non sequitur that evolution is powerful, ergo we should leave everything to evolution. Gravity is powerful, too, but that doesn't make it "contrary to nature" to make planes.
Jan, I did not say that evolution was powerful, I said it was a process which has proven to work well, so well that it is hailed as the very cause of our being! Airplanes work along with the natural laws of nature not contrary to them. Immunization works against the natural processes of evolution, it short circuits it.
My point is, mankind may be harming his natural ability to evolve a better, more perfect immune system by applying these quick fixes. Scientists who believe in evolution should have faith enough in it to trust that natural selection is the better way to go rather than thwarting this process by using immunization which saves the individual but does not produce a better, stronger species.
IW