professor,
I have never read that Nixon was a drunk. There is a difference between a 'drunk' and an alcoholic. All drunks are alcoholics, but not all alcoholics are drunks. Have you ever seen someone drunk? I am not talking about a 'buzz' or a 'warm fuzzy', I am talking about 'drunk', which means intoxication above the legal limit...out of control. This is what Rutherford has been accused of. Even if Rutherford drank fifty beers at one setting but maintained, and did not change his mood or behavior he could not be called 'drunk'. Drunks cannot maintain their behavior nor control their mood changes, although some first stage alcoholics can. So, I feel that the name 'drunk' is an unfair title given to Rutherford even if he may have been an alcoholic.