Well, it's clear that the baptism was done without truly, fully understanding what it would mean, for those of us who were fairly young. I was not quite 13 when I got baptized. I knew it was expected of me, and that I was smart enough to know or learn the answers to the baptism questions, and that I had no other plans in mind for my life, so I did it. It was what I wanted, and I'd still be in if I still believed it was the true religion.
But really, can a JW honestly say he or she was baptized in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit? Not in my opinion. More like Father, Son and Organization. Think about it. They actually have to go into detail in WT articles about what it means to be baptized in the name of the Father, Son, and holy spirit--as if it isn't self-explanatory, as if it has to be qualified by their specific definition in order to count. That said, the baptism wasn't really a Christian baptism save in appearance only. So it's kind of invalid by definition anyway, if you ask me. But if you still feel the Jesus vibe, and held onto that belief, and always believed it was about faith in Jesus, then I guess it could count, even if it was done under crap circumstances.
--sd-7