this question is in the now famous 4/15 watchtower in the do you rememebr section.. i want to know what the source article said, because i can hardly agree with this statement as written.
i am assuming this is in relation to the "translation" of the nwt, but it is misleading to the point of fiction.. can anyone look at the 4/1 watchtower and tell me what is says?.
.
This question is in the now famous 4/15 watchtower in the do you rememebr section.
I want to know what the source article said, because I can hardly agree with this statement as written. I am assuming this is in relation to the "translation" of the NWT, but it is misleading to the point of fiction.
Can anyone look at the 4/1 watchtower and tell me what is says?
just when i thought this stupid belief that earthquakes went up in 1914, here it is again.
4/6/2010.
this was a co giving the talk, the same one that ended with overlapping generations.. http://dl.dropbox.com/u/27642/earthquake.mp3.
Sphere....does light cause earthquakes when it gets brighter?
just when i thought this stupid belief that earthquakes went up in 1914, here it is again.
4/6/2010.
this was a co giving the talk, the same one that ended with overlapping generations.. http://dl.dropbox.com/u/27642/earthquake.mp3.
Black Sheep, Yes, that is a CO. I don't know his age, but he is on the older side of the scale.
Zid, he really did not sound quite that bad in person, but he did sound to me like a person that was going out of their way to sound humble.
MFree.. I haven't read the book but I am familiar with the argument. I thought that they had dropped the whole earthquake increase thng along time ago. I thought they realized how stupid an argument it is.
I think we may have some deaf on the board so I wanted to summarize this clip.
a. reads Matt 24 emphasis on earthquakes.
b. says earth quakes have increades since 1914.
c. "they" don't know why (i don't know who "they" is)
d. every time he gives this talk he looks at a website and the number of earthquakes are up.
e. scientists are lying to us about the number of earthquakes and resons for increase.
f. not all scientists are liers because some are our "brothers and sisters"
just when i thought this stupid belief that earthquakes went up in 1914, here it is again.
4/6/2010.
this was a co giving the talk, the same one that ended with overlapping generations.. http://dl.dropbox.com/u/27642/earthquake.mp3.
Just when I thought this stupid belief that earthquakes went up in 1914, here it is again. 4/6/2010
This was a CO giving the talk, the same one that ended with overlapping generations.
this will start your weekend with a laugh.. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nficqklgub0.
.
viewer watches all the best scenes in the trailer and is disappointed in the actual move.
Thanks :-)
Cool, I really want to do this.
Even better, we should do this here, do we trust each other enough to do this? Is there someone here not from the US that would trade post cards with me?
many on here are keen to hide their identity, me included, i don't want to be df'd and many of the views i express on here would be enough for most jc's to df me sine die.. anyone reading on here who knows me a little more than vaguely could work out who i am, my list of cars i have owned for example, on another thread.. but what could they do ?.
i know they could make a case, and then as happened to a young sister in a neighbouring congo.
say they would investigate why the bro.
if they could really figure out who I am then I would be disfellowshipped. I would not deny it at this point, why should I? I don't own them anything, I only have to answer to my wife and son.
Recently my mother saw this site after borrrowing my laptop, I doubt she could figure out who I was, but it forced us to confront my feelings. Luckly she is still talking to me and knows to keep it to herself. I think she knows what would happen.
on a thread somewhere else a dub posted:.
finally, on the blood issue.
for us, it is a moral question.
so...1 in 500,000 chance of dying from a tranfusion, or 1 in 2 chance of bleeding to death...ok, go ahead and choose...hurry up, you only have seconds!
reading jeff's thread about dress made me think of my one and only trip to bethel.. i can't remember if i was babtised at the time, but i went with a bus load of jws.. like someone said in the last thread, printing presses and empty rooms.
i was very disapointed, however i don't think i had any pre-concieved notions of what it would be like.
what i was diapointed in was so much of the "tour" was walking hallways looking at exhibits behind glass.
Heartbreaker,
sterile and boring is a very good description.
WhenI was there, there was a layout room we passed, something that would normally be on the tour. They were prepping a new release for the summer, and had black plastic all over the windows. This covered a large area that they said was normally part of the public tour.
That never felt right to me, why all the secreacy, I mean we were witnesses, it was just another book or something, they are non-profit right, why couldn't we see it? We did make the long trip to visit, why not let us see it?
Also, what do you mean by be allowed to own these? Did you see some off limits books?
It sounds like the only way to really see the place is have friends take you around.
reading jeff's thread about dress made me think of my one and only trip to bethel.. i can't remember if i was babtised at the time, but i went with a bus load of jws.. like someone said in the last thread, printing presses and empty rooms.
i was very disapointed, however i don't think i had any pre-concieved notions of what it would be like.
what i was diapointed in was so much of the "tour" was walking hallways looking at exhibits behind glass.
LOL moshe,
I guess in the same way none one is allowed in the the writting committies library, even bethelites?
