Larsinger58 - So if I'm understanding you correctly, you believe that the JW doctrine of literal Jews no longer being a chosen people, but that the "chosen tribes" are completely symbolic and include all people, is false, right? That is very thought-provoking. It would make sense when one considers the promises that God gave to patriarchs like Abraham and Isaac concerning their seed. He promised them inheritances for their lines, so one could take this in a literal sense. God said nothing about cutting off the seed of Abraham. True the ancient Jews had a rocky relationship at times with God, but there was no black-and-white voiding of His original promise to Abraham, yes?
Basically, the Christian covenant was in additon to the Abrahamic covenant. Both covenants end in 1996. They are look two staffs that become one within spiritual Israel. The natural Jews make up 10% of the kingdom, 144,000 seats. The other 90% is made up of gentiles.
As you note, the promise to restore the Jews to their homeland, particularly in celebration of the 70th jubilee did occur; the Jews have their homeland back and are a prosperous nation through Jehovah's blessing. But this comes on the heels of the "great tribulation", a unique event in world history, which was the HOLOCAUST. Obviously, if Jehovah is punishing the Jews during the Holocaust, causing two-thirds to pass through the fire, as prophesied at Zech 13:8, then clearly that covenant is still in place. Further, again, what about the promise of restoration to their homeland? That part of the promise did come true. So certainly the covenant is still in place.
A specific reference to the covenant is at Daniel 9 where it says specifically let the covenant be in place for the many until the end of the week:
27 “And he must keep [the] covenant in force for the many for one week; and at the half of the week he will cause sacrifice and gift offering to cease."
The "many" here is a reference to the Jewish covenant, the "few" would be a reference to those under the Christian covenant. Since this is about the second coming it confirms the covenant week for the many, that is the Jews, would continue in force until th eend of the week. That "week" is 49 years from 1949-1996. The end of the "sacrifice and gift" in the middle of te week, in this case, is in relation to when the prodigal son leaves his father's house and becomes spiritually dead. The "fruit of the lips" is a form of sacrifice and gift and so the witnessing and preaching and Christian lifestyle of the messiah ends when he turns to a life of sexual immorality.
If you divide 49 years, 7 weeks of 7 years each into 3 + 3 + 1, then the middle 7-year period would fall from 1968-1975. That is:
3 x 7 = 21
21 + 1947 = 1968
1968 + 7= 1975
This represents my ages of 18-25. Around 18 I became sexually active, ended up getting disfellowshipped later on, even became a male prostitute for a while when I was 22-23, but by 1975 I was back in the truth. I know because I went to the assembly in 1975 and heard that talk about how thy were not expecting there to be another assembly next year because they were expecting Armageddon, etc.
So the end of sacrifice and gift in terms of the messiah's spritual death did occur in relation to when the prodigal son becomes spiritually dead in the middle of the week. But our primary point here is that the covenant with the Jews was still in force until 1996. Their 70th jubilee from the time of Moses was from 1947-1996.
But can you see what is happening? Once you focus on all the prophecies about the 2nd coming and the messiah, it becomes clear the Bible absolutely supports a physical second coming and in 1992. Once you finally see that's the case then you will ask whether the true Christ arrived in 1992 or not and I'm here to answer the personal questions that fulfill the details of prophecy, such as was I really a male prostitute at one time. I have proof because I got arrested for it. Or the prophecy that he would appear like an "Ethiopian eunuch", meaning an effeminate (gay) black male. Of course, that's the case as well.
The messiah, Lazarus, can be identified because he torments the GB (the rich man) with his teachings, which are like a sharp, double-edged sword with which he strikes the nations. That means I should have some advanced truth that exposes some old lies. Well I do. The academic world is still lying about the true timeline for the NB Period, I expose that and establish the true, original timeline, using both the Bible and ancient astronomy texts like the VAT4956 and the SK400. It is not a mistake they were created and preserved to confirm this. Plus the cmpetition between me and the WTS as far as what the Bible truly teaches is a slam-dunk win for me. And these are easy false teachings most anyone can follow, like the day of the week of Jesus' death not being a Friday but a Thursday. It's just a matter of looking closely at all the scriptures and figuring it out.
So all is being fulfilled, but you have to look at what the scriptures say first to know if what is said is being fulfilled.
It is and it is through me. "I'm coming out" to confirm who I am now with the scriptures to support that. Eventually, you'll see that I match the promised messiah of 1992, whether you accept me or not. But if you don't accept me, you'd best be looking for the other ex-male prostitute black messiah, because only someone fitting that description is the true messiah of the Bible.
LS