LOL @ Alice. Your silence is deafening...
Any other "apologists" want to step up to the plate?
Prior to 1914, did the WTS teach that Jesus would return invisible in 1914?
Simple 'Yes' or 'No' please.
in george orwell's novel 'nineteen eighty-four' the capitulation of the principal protagonist is portrayed in his willingness to assent to the proposition that two and two make five.
once he had denied objective reality, his mental conquest was complete and he was no longer truly the master of his own mind.
nineteen eighty-four is in many ways, a very depressing read.. a charge commonly leveled at jehovah's witnesses is that the type of mind control envisioned by orwell has been and continues to be used on them.
LOL @ Alice. Your silence is deafening...
Any other "apologists" want to step up to the plate?
Prior to 1914, did the WTS teach that Jesus would return invisible in 1914?
Simple 'Yes' or 'No' please.
compare these two "generation" quotes from the watchtower -- which one is correct?
how did god's "channel of communication" make an error this big?.
the watchtower, november 1st, 1995, pages 30-31:.
Great post.
Worst part is, tomorrow they could change back to the 1995 view and the dubbies would just eat it up........
in george orwell's novel 'nineteen eighty-four' the capitulation of the principal protagonist is portrayed in his willingness to assent to the proposition that two and two make five.
once he had denied objective reality, his mental conquest was complete and he was no longer truly the master of his own mind.
nineteen eighty-four is in many ways, a very depressing read.. a charge commonly leveled at jehovah's witnesses is that the type of mind control envisioned by orwell has been and continues to be used on them.
Since Alice the "apologist" is online and posting, I will btttt for her one more time:
A SIMPLE QUESTION FOR ALICE:
Prior to 1914, did the WTS teach that Jesus would return invisible in 1914?
Simple 'Yes' or 'No' please.
.
seeing as the wts has plagiarized the john william's jurassic park theme song, how about someone (v?
) put together a clip with song 92 (preach the word) playing in the background with all the society's beliefs about dinsosaurs?
The WTS is certainly not above plagiarism:
known to the people you gave me.
" {john `17:25,26 ab} one outstanding thing should be notice right at the outset.
jesus had said that they did what the father had told them.
BTTT for Wannabe:
Wannabe:
Given that the word "Jehovah" is an amalgamation of the Tetragrammaton (consonants) and "Adonai" (vowels), making a BRAND NEW WORD, can you explain (in a few words, if that is possible for you) why it should be used today as the name of God?
in george orwell's novel 'nineteen eighty-four' the capitulation of the principal protagonist is portrayed in his willingness to assent to the proposition that two and two make five.
once he had denied objective reality, his mental conquest was complete and he was no longer truly the master of his own mind.
nineteen eighty-four is in many ways, a very depressing read.. a charge commonly leveled at jehovah's witnesses is that the type of mind control envisioned by orwell has been and continues to be used on them.
BTTT for Alice:
A SIMPLE QUESTION FOR ALICE:
Prior to 1914, did the WTS teach that Jesus would return invisible in 1914?
Simple 'Yes' or 'No' please.
known to the people you gave me.
" {john `17:25,26 ab} one outstanding thing should be notice right at the outset.
jesus had said that they did what the father had told them.
How to create a word that is not your name in three simple steps:
1) Take a name (we'll use "gubberningbody") and strip out the vowels: "g_bb_rn_ngb_dy"
2) Take another word (we'll use "fascinating") and strip out the consonants: "_a__i_a_i__"
3) Now combine consontants from word one with vowels from word two: "gabbirnangbidy"
And voila! We've just created a new word that is not your name: gabbirnangbidy
known to the people you gave me.
" {john `17:25,26 ab} one outstanding thing should be notice right at the outset.
jesus had said that they did what the father had told them.
BTTT
how in the world can a religious organization that claims to be god's true channel on earth and led my his holy spirit have a majority of it's gb members vote yes on something, but it not pass because 2/3's didn't vote yes?
why would these supposely "spirit annointed" leaders of the "only true religion" not all be lead by holy spirit to pass an important mandate or change?
in coc ray franz talks of jw life affecting voting not passing because although it was a majority, it wasn't 2/3's or a gb member was gone during the vote.
I remember being shocked by this the first time I read CoC.
'Wait, you mean to say the GB members don't agree with one another on doctrine?!..........'
in george orwell's novel 'nineteen eighty-four' the capitulation of the principal protagonist is portrayed in his willingness to assent to the proposition that two and two make five.
once he had denied objective reality, his mental conquest was complete and he was no longer truly the master of his own mind.
nineteen eighty-four is in many ways, a very depressing read.. a charge commonly leveled at jehovah's witnesses is that the type of mind control envisioned by orwell has been and continues to be used on them.
A SIMPLE QUESTION FOR ALICE:
Prior to 1914, did the WTS teach that Jesus would return invisible in 1914?
Simple 'Yes' or 'No' please.