pr0ner11 minutes ago
What a strange way to frame not filming the environmentalists. Saying he couldn't cover them "fairly and honestly" seems to imply that he was catching them in lies. Perhaps he means they were making plans that couldn't be filmed but again why say the activists wouldn't allow you to cover it honestly?
It says "I can't make it enough of a one sided, suitably left-leaning virtue-signal fest to ensure total social media approval & maximum traction. Because I'm neither skilled or knowledgeable enough to make an honest & well balanced appraisal, yet still withstand the criticism and backlash that will inevitably follow a less than glowing, more nuanced report."
It's no wonder he's given to following the herd. He's gone from one self congratulatory echo chamber to another - golden child of both. It's one of the reasons he is so unable to deal with criticism - JWs are at once averse to anyone not agreeing with their group, yet hyper critical of each other, too.