I must say, though, a "live" case of the depth of seriousness Selina alleges, would require the plaintiff NOT to approach the other party or anyone associated with him and would definitely prohibit her from threatening them. It could even end up destroying the whole case. Surely she couldn't risk that?
Therefore I'm pretty sure it's not (currently) being investigated and isn't anything to do with the Pennsylvania case which is what some callers were saying. It could be why Selina is so angry and frustrated?