So Orphan Crow. I showed you that Watchtower does acknowledge that Child Abuse can include that of child pornography and in fact more than child pornography but sexting with a minor. Does that mean that your argument falls flat in the water and doesn't leave the gate.
Lets cut to the chase here - sexting with a minor is child abuse to them because it involves someone who is a witness
Child pornography is not child abuse to the Watchtower because the victim is likely a worldly child, AKA birdfood.
And no her argument does not fall flat in the water just because Watchtower views a Seperate issue, sexting a minor, as abuse. We are talking about child porn and that those clunkheads cannot empathise with the *hell* some worldly child has gone through *and* that it is illegal.
Jeese.