while australia is dealing with this pedaphile protection policy that the wt seems to have, how awesome would it be if the world court of human rights was to look into it as well, seeing how the wt is a global organization.
I think you're right. It definitely falls under human rights. 1000+ pedophile offenders not reported to authorities. That's an important finding, and with all the information that shows the WT's policies add insult to injury in such cases I would think other governmental agencies would get a heads up and start looking into things themselves.
Maybe having some letter writing campaign to these agencies like the World Court would help expose the WT and it's policies.
...c0ntr013r and barbara anderson for their efforts in recording the events in australia as they happen.. .
thank you :).
i am shocked that an expert would simply examine only the literature given to her by the organisation she was defending and simply accept it.
also the ease she has in making huge sweeping statements when comparing the jw's to all other international religious organisations simply undermines her professionalism.. i am also thoroughly shocked at her blatant, 'expert for hire', 'will defend anyone' apparent decision making, the organisation is responsible for covering up thousands of abuse victims by its own records, in australia alone!
never mind their judicial process being heartless and traumatic!.
Let me get this straight...She (a catholic, worldly woman) has had access to the elder's book and other confidential material.
I wonder if the WT gave the Doctor a copy of the letter stating that women could not even photocopy the flock book nor be able to have access to it in any way. I'd be tempted to send her a printed copy to her office.
i'm just listening to this so called doctors testimony.
where did the watchtower dig her up from.
her answers have mostly been maybe's and i think!.
by popular demand i give you day 4, and i will finally get a couple of days to sleep .
part 1 has been uploaded and part 2,3 and 4 will soon be available.. part 1:.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9lmlcdqesa0&list=plpq6kz-aghvqbadlzmqn26dvmpzddxlui&index=11.
https://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/case-study/636f01a5-50db-4b59-a35e-a24ae07fb0ad/case-study-29,-july-2015,-sydney.
anyone know who this monty baker is?
i'm sure this guy will be able to tell the rc how things work behind the scenes without all the evasiveness, being that he is an "apostate".
The WT lawyer definitely made a big hole for himself and the WT by saying that the procedures in the elder's handbook are not always followed because there's other updates and guidance provided. Now he's been asked to provide the written guidelines that add to the Shepherd the Flock book.
That probably means all the side notes to the book, which don't appear in letters or articles. That would be interesting.
https://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/case-study/636f01a5-50db-4b59-a35e-a24ae07fb0ad/case-study-29,-july-2015,-sydney.
anyone know who this monty baker is?
i'm sure this guy will be able to tell the rc how things work behind the scenes without all the evasiveness, being that he is an "apostate".
The WT lawyer just mumbles and it's so hard to follow him. But the Doctor doesn't seem to have problems understanding his questioning unlike how she was constantly asking for rephrasing and clarifications from Mr. Stewart.
And who keeps coughing so hard that it comes through the mics and you can't even here what's being discussed. Can't the person excuse themselves and get a drink of water or something, man, that is so annoying!
https://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/case-study/636f01a5-50db-4b59-a35e-a24ae07fb0ad/case-study-29,-july-2015,-sydney.
anyone know who this monty baker is?
i'm sure this guy will be able to tell the rc how things work behind the scenes without all the evasiveness, being that he is an "apostate".
raise flashing lights about the socio-cultural environment of Jehovah's Witnesses."
"It creates the perfect storm for child abuse."
Dr. Applewhite asks Mr. Stewart to explain what he means by "raise flashing lights". She's spends her time reading JWdotOrg so much that she can't keep up with the English vernacular. Did she not understand "perfect storm" either?
Well, Dr. Applewhite just asked for a short break after getting shown up. Maybe she's wondering how she ever decided to help the Watchtower with her report. Now the WT's lawyer is going to try and save what's left.
this may have been discussed before, but this article just now popped up in my online search for "jw news": .
man at jehovah's witness facility died of natural causes.
does it not seem really, really strange that he would not have been missed all day saturday and sunday?
JW Volunteer Who Died Translating Sign Language
Sign language, eh? Maybe nobody could "hear" him.
The building in Palm Coast is quite large, it was the site of the FAA offices and a Management / Leadership training center. It's very near the ocean. They must have paid quite a pretty penny for it. No wonder Lett said a "translation" center costs millions. They bought a whole prime property complex near the ocean! I'm sure they're happy they're not paying taxes on that.
https://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/case-study/636f01a5-50db-4b59-a35e-a24ae07fb0ad/case-study-29,-july-2015,-sydney.
anyone know who this monty baker is?
i'm sure this guy will be able to tell the rc how things work behind the scenes without all the evasiveness, being that he is an "apostate".
Dr. Applewhite admitted she had a full load of other cases when she wrote to the Commission and her writing wasn't as correct as she'd like it to be.
Two or three times Mr. Stewart has brought out she gave references that were wrong and asked her what the actual reference was. How can she be considered an "expert" if she gives wrong references repeatedly?
And as brought out in other comments here, she's had several times where she tried avoiding answering what Mr. Stewart was plainly asking her, constantly requesting he rephrase the question, then she answers with a question to him "how do you see it"?
As of this lunch break she's definitely assured the commission that her report is rubbish and her "expert" conclusions are wrong.
