at the beginning of the week i watched a documentary on the libel.
suit brought against penguin books and deborah lipstadt but lost by.
holocaust denier david irving?
Reflect on the degree of the conspiracy that would be required to make Irving's ravings credible.
It would take thousands of people who were unknown to each other to relate the same experiences, containing countless verifiable details, consistently over seven decades.
What possible motive could anybody have for accusing all those victims of lying? CJ - DId it not occur to you to investigate the evidence before publicly promoting the lies of this fool?
at the beginning of the week i watched a documentary on the libel.
suit brought against penguin books and deborah lipstadt but lost by.
holocaust denier david irving?
Why would anything that charlatan says be interesting?
after some considerable thought i have decided that i will no longer post on this forum because i want to return to jehovah.
thank you for all the kindness and many interesting discussions over the years.
i wish you all well in the future and the decisions you make.
SBF has had more comebacks than Frank Sinatra
arguing with those who reject scientific evidence can be like arguing about football; just as angry and passionate, but the goalposts keep moving, and one team doesn't exist.. read more here....
If you really want help from all that I urge you and orphan to pick up a bible and read through ...everybody should read the bible and with a very critical eye - Looter
I read the bible many times. I object to slavery - therefore your god is beneath my contempt.
arguing with those who reject scientific evidence can be like arguing about football; just as angry and passionate, but the goalposts keep moving, and one team doesn't exist.. read more here....
I started this as a bit of amusing satire about irrational creationists.
arguing with those who reject scientific evidence can be like arguing about football; just as angry and passionate, but the goalposts keep moving, and one team doesn't exist.. read more here....
Rattigan if you are aware of even one single shred of scientific evidence for creationism please share it.
By the way how are you defining "God"?
arguing with those who reject scientific evidence can be like arguing about football; just as angry and passionate, but the goalposts keep moving, and one team doesn't exist.. read more here....
Is there even a remote possibility of getting back on topic?
By the way the topic is how frustrating it is trying to hold a rational conversation with a creationist. Ha!
arguing with those who reject scientific evidence can be like arguing about football; just as angry and passionate, but the goalposts keep moving, and one team doesn't exist.. read more here....
Only then will I become a believer
We both know that won't happen.
arguing with those who reject scientific evidence can be like arguing about football; just as angry and passionate, but the goalposts keep moving, and one team doesn't exist.. read more here....
Vidqun - Just for the record I think you had a really interesting job. But I also think you were wrong to try to use your scientific qualifications to lend authority to your religious opinions.
now we all have heard how the universe is composed of matter and space.
and we always here of how it had a beginning.
but really what could have begun it?
As mere mortals mankind knows nothing.
Speak for yourself. I know a lot of things.
I know that the god of christian theism is impossible.
