Major story on main 6pm program now on JW non-reporting of child abuse. Expert reckons there are thousands of unreported cases still to be revealed.
MP planning to raise it in Parliament!
major story on main 6pm program now on jw non-reporting of child abuse.
expert reckons there are thousands of unreported cases still to be revealed.
mp planning to raise it in parliament!
Major story on main 6pm program now on JW non-reporting of child abuse. Expert reckons there are thousands of unreported cases still to be revealed.
MP planning to raise it in Parliament!
today on bbc news site http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-42025255 sorry about typo in heading big story on bbc news in uk.
Top link in BBC News portal...
at one time scientists believed that living things and non-living things were made of different material, accounting for the unique properties of living things.
this idea is called vitalism and is no longer popular.
what does remain popular (in fact is still the dominant view) is a similar idea that things that experience the world (humans, frogs, mice) are different from things that don't experience the world (potatoes, rocks, snowflakes).
The basic point is that awareness is a property of all matter
That is nothing but an evidence-free bald assertion.
It is not even wrong.
at one time scientists believed that living things and non-living things were made of different material, accounting for the unique properties of living things.
this idea is called vitalism and is no longer popular.
what does remain popular (in fact is still the dominant view) is a similar idea that things that experience the world (humans, frogs, mice) are different from things that don't experience the world (potatoes, rocks, snowflakes).
jp1692 that statement is about the consciousness of non-human animals. That is not very controversial but it has nothing to do with the insane proposal that rocks have consciousness which is what SBF is proposing.
at one time scientists believed that living things and non-living things were made of different material, accounting for the unique properties of living things.
this idea is called vitalism and is no longer popular.
what does remain popular (in fact is still the dominant view) is a similar idea that things that experience the world (humans, frogs, mice) are different from things that don't experience the world (potatoes, rocks, snowflakes).
the idea is getting more popular - because it makes sense
How can the idea that a rock is conscious make any sense at all?
on other boards and new sites they are talking about contact with aliens in the next 20 years.
i think that would be reckless and dangerous.
how could you tell if it was a genuine space alien and not a demon?
a co-worker asked me to attend a Full Gospel Businessman's Luncheon
What do you mean by "Full" (with an upper-case "F) gospel Edward? How does it differ from what most christians would understand by the gospel?
at one time scientists believed that living things and non-living things were made of different material, accounting for the unique properties of living things.
this idea is called vitalism and is no longer popular.
what does remain popular (in fact is still the dominant view) is a similar idea that things that experience the world (humans, frogs, mice) are different from things that don't experience the world (potatoes, rocks, snowflakes).
However, I will apply the idea only to live matter. - never a jw
Which is to totally miss the point.
The clue is in the "pan" of pansychism. In other words these, Discovery Institute funded, geniuses are proposing that rocks are conscious.
at one time scientists believed that living things and non-living things were made of different material, accounting for the unique properties of living things.
this idea is called vitalism and is no longer popular.
what does remain popular (in fact is still the dominant view) is a similar idea that things that experience the world (humans, frogs, mice) are different from things that don't experience the world (potatoes, rocks, snowflakes).
in fact is still the dominant view...
Dominant as in 9.999999999999999999999999999999999% of actual scientists.
at one time scientists believed that living things and non-living things were made of different material, accounting for the unique properties of living things.
this idea is called vitalism and is no longer popular.
what does remain popular (in fact is still the dominant view) is a similar idea that things that experience the world (humans, frogs, mice) are different from things that don't experience the world (potatoes, rocks, snowflakes).
what do you think there hiding?.
Ultimately, the parents should protect their kids and when parents fail to do that, the kids suffer; and then the kids sue watchtower. - Fisherman
If you had good reason to believe that your dog was aggressive but you let it roam free in the park you would be morally and legally liable when it attacked a child.
Try telling the judge that the parent should have done a better job of protecting their child.
If you had a document that proved you knew in advance that the dog was a danger to children the court would be right to demand that you hand it over.
How does it feel to be an apologist for those who expose children to dangerous pedophiles? Who could have guessed that this is the thing Jehovah's Witnesses would become best known for?