I didn't ask for a definition of consciousness, I said that on previous occasions you have declined to define 'awareness'. Still waiting.
Rocks are 'aware'? And you can say that with a straight face?
How does methodological naturalism offer evidence against the idea that awareness is fundamental to matter?
It can't because it is 'not even wrong'. The burden of proof is all yours. 'That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.' - Christopher Hitchens
Methodological naturalism works.