ExB - It is a reasonable position to admit that you still lack sufficient information to come to a conclusion on a particular question.
That is very different from choosing 'informed ignorance' (your words).
It is also unreasonable to hold passionate opinions about a scientific question when - by your own admission - you have done absolutely no research.
Cofty did chemistry do it’s thing originally by chance or was it intelligent design?
Please read what I actually wrote. Is it 'chance' when a rock rolls down a hill?