If one sets out to deliberately malign the Bible, would that be considered a sin against the Holy Spirit?
Considered by who?
let's assume that the bible is god's word and the men who wrote it were borne along ( inspired ) by holy spirit.
if one sets out to deliberately malign the bible, would that be considered a sin against the holy spirit?.
If one sets out to deliberately malign the Bible, would that be considered a sin against the Holy Spirit?
Considered by who?
i’m agnostic so maybe the universe started by chance or by design.. if it was by design (hypothetically) and the bible is the designers word, and jws seem to be the closest to it, then what would be the largest things you would change?.
here are a few ideas.
-do away with the governing body thinking they are gods only channel.
Cofty thinks it’s not JWs it is another group and I have asked him several times which other group has love among themselves all around the world?
I have not said any such thing.
I agree with everything Grretteacher said about how false the so-called love of JWs is.
They will literally treat you as if you are dead for a thought crime. Parents will cut off their own children and exclude their grandchildren from their lives. Parents will let their infant child die for want of life-saving medical treatment. They will allow pedophiles to carry on their evil crimes safe from the authorities because they value the reputation of their precious cult more than the safety of their children.
If you think love can be built on a foundation of enforced uniformity of thought you are still under its spell.
i’m agnostic so maybe the universe started by chance or by design.. if it was by design (hypothetically) and the bible is the designers word, and jws seem to be the closest to it, then what would be the largest things you would change?.
here are a few ideas.
-do away with the governing body thinking they are gods only channel.
Cofty which organisation do you think is closer to the truth about the Bible than JWs?
What you are actually asking is - which organisation that agrees with the way the JWs interpret the bible is closer to the truth?
The bible does not present a consistent view of any major doctrine so it all depends on your preferences. JWs major on trivial things and miss the big picture.
Specifically they have a view of Jesus that is at odds with the early church. Secondly the JWs story of the meaning of Jesus' death would be alien to them.
i’m agnostic so maybe the universe started by chance or by design.. if it was by design (hypothetically) and the bible is the designers word, and jws seem to be the closest to it, then what would be the largest things you would change?.
here are a few ideas.
-do away with the governing body thinking they are gods only channel.
It seems to many that JWs seem to be the closest to this
That is delusional.
i’m agnostic so maybe the universe started by chance or by design.. if it was by design (hypothetically) and the bible is the designers word, and jws seem to be the closest to it, then what would be the largest things you would change?.
here are a few ideas.
-do away with the governing body thinking they are gods only channel.
Do away with the risible idea that the bible is literally the inspired word of God.
It has some interesting content, some wisdom, some beauty and a whole lot of repugnant narrative.
Stop insulting the intelligence of people by insisting that Adam and Eve were actual characters and that life hasn't existed on earth for millions of years.
You shouldn't have to pretend to be scientifically illiterate in order to belong to a community.
And also - stop calling it 'The Truth '. That moniker hasn't aged well.
na28: ὧν οἱ πατέρες καὶ ἐξ ὧν ὁ χριστὸς τὸ κατὰ σάρκα, ὁ ὢν ἐπὶ πάντων θεὸς εὐλογητὸς εἰς τοὺς αἰῶνας, ἀμήν.. na28 transliterated: hō̃n hoi patéres kaì ex hō̃n ho khristòs tò katà sárka, ho ṑn epì pántōn theòs eulogētòs eis toùs aiō̃nas, amḗn.. kit: .
nwt: to them the forefathers belong, and from them the christ descended according to the flesh.
god, who is over all, be praised forever.
How refreshing to see some thoughtful exchange of ideas on the forum.
in ancient israel many of the prophets were killed as a result of their religious assignments —from god.
even soldiers were sent out to fight against idolatrous “uncircumcised” and logically some died for example jonathan, the son of king saul.
these soldiers were said to be fighting the wars of jehovah and there was no miraculous salvation for everybody all of the time.
Fleshmarket Close in Edinburgh actually exists. That doesn't mean Rebus is a real Scottish policeman.
Same goes for Baker Street and Sherlock Holmes, or Sherwood Forrest and Robin Hood. The fact that Jehu may have really ruled Judah doesn't say anything about the veracity of Yahweh.
jacob had 13 children (am i wrong?
): 12 boys and 1 girl.. if you flip a coin 13 times, the probability to have 12 heads is about 0.002!.
.
Yes
jacob had 13 children (am i wrong?
): 12 boys and 1 girl.. if you flip a coin 13 times, the probability to have 12 heads is about 0.002!.
.
some males only give off one type of chromosome
Sorry but I don't think that can possibly be true. Do you have a source for that?
It is true that some males have a slight bias towards one or the other. In the big picture 51% of babies are males.
in ancient israel many of the prophets were killed as a result of their religious assignments —from god.
even soldiers were sent out to fight against idolatrous “uncircumcised” and logically some died for example jonathan, the son of king saul.
these soldiers were said to be fighting the wars of jehovah and there was no miraculous salvation for everybody all of the time.
The bible is a collection of Bronze Age and Iron Age myths that promotes some of the most repulsive morality.
Why on earth would anybody pay respect to it let alone die for it?