Clearly, Jesus was in two places at the same time
It's difficult to tell the difference between a genuine xtian apologist and a spoof.
i just had a thought of clarity regarding the jw explanation for this doctrine.
they explain that satan challenged god regarding his right to rule.
god failed to prove his right to rule.
Clearly, Jesus was in two places at the same time
It's difficult to tell the difference between a genuine xtian apologist and a spoof.
i just had a thought of clarity regarding the jw explanation for this doctrine.
they explain that satan challenged god regarding his right to rule.
god failed to prove his right to rule.
Perry - What are you on about? I am working from the christian definition of god and judging him by his OWN standards: not my standards.
Christianity is not only objectively wrong, it is internally contradictory and it is there that I make my stand.
i just had a thought of clarity regarding the jw explanation for this doctrine.
they explain that satan challenged god regarding his right to rule.
god failed to prove his right to rule.
SBF - I have no interest in going round this again.
Jesus revealed god to be love, defined as care for others.
The facts prove otherwise.
Find somebody else who will indulge your PoMo bullshit where words have no meaning.
i just had a thought of clarity regarding the jw explanation for this doctrine.
they explain that satan challenged god regarding his right to rule.
god failed to prove his right to rule.
Genuine objective morality is only possible by first omitting gods from the discussion.
Theology has no moral or ethical system, only a collection of arbitrary and capricious diktats.
i just had a thought of clarity regarding the jw explanation for this doctrine.
they explain that satan challenged god regarding his right to rule.
god failed to prove his right to rule.
If God defines what is good, then on what grounds can we judge him? - SBF
We judge him by his own revelation.
i just had a thought of clarity regarding the jw explanation for this doctrine.
they explain that satan challenged god regarding his right to rule.
god failed to prove his right to rule.
Venus - It's hilarious that you use the hiddenness of god as evidence for god.
The logical contortions of apologists knows no bounds.
i intend for this to be one of a series of bite-sized ops on the evidence for evolution.. introduction to dna genes are sequences of dna made up of words (codons) each of which are three letters (bases) long.
there are only four letters in the genetic alphabet (acg&t) each word or codon is the recipe for one amino acid.
there are 20 different amino acids in living organisms.
Hooby - Did you understand my answer about the difference between ontological and methodological naturalism?
This is the key to your misunderstanding.
Hundreds of years ago EVERYBODY was a creationist. Despite their tendency to take refuge in supernatural answers whenever they got stuck progress was made.
Newton made some brilliant advances in understanding physics but because he couldn't work out why all the planets move on the same plane he declared it was the miraculous work of god. Now we know how planets are formed his supernatural answer is believed by nobody because it is no longer necessary.
What you are advocating is a god-of-the-gaps. He is not needed in any way to explain the complexity and diversity of living things.
i just had a thought of clarity regarding the jw explanation for this doctrine.
they explain that satan challenged god regarding his right to rule.
god failed to prove his right to rule.
What if God doesn’t meet our understanding of goodness? - SBF
Then he is unworthy of our worship or even of our respect.
According to christianity Jesus came to make god known to humanity. He taught that god is love and he defined love in terms of doing good to others including your enemies.
Therefore god fails to meet his own revealed standards.
yesterday they started a three part series on hasidic jews living mostly in brooklyn and new jersey and how they take advantage of the system and at the same time rule with an iron hand for bidding the use of modern technology, smart phones, tv etc .
if you think the witnesses are bad, take a look at them.
they ostracize you and kick your children out of their schools and treat you as nonexistent !
Israel is also experiencing a significant increase in Jewish religious extremism.
Some at the far end are anti-Zionist. Go figure!
i intend for this to be one of a series of bite-sized ops on the evidence for evolution.. introduction to dna genes are sequences of dna made up of words (codons) each of which are three letters (bases) long.
there are only four letters in the genetic alphabet (acg&t) each word or codon is the recipe for one amino acid.
there are 20 different amino acids in living organisms.
Perry it occurred to me today what a spectacular own-goal you scored yesterday.
The research that you drew attention to destroys the fundie xtian concept of animal 'kinds'. The central point of the paper was the profoundly significant differences between species at the level of mitochondrial DNA.
That removes the usual lame apologetic waffle about Noah taking 'kinds' of animals on the Ark as representative of multiple species. Instead it would be necessary for Noah to take two (or five) of every one of the 8.7 million species on the Ark. It also provided powerful evidence that our 8.7 million extant species emerged from earlier ancestors 200,000 years ago.
Your only get-out of your risible flood myth has just been demolished by a study that you drew our attention to because your wrongly thought it undermined evolution.
I think that is called being 'hoisted by your own petard'.