Alex - The answer to your previous post is that the idea of life arising in an 'organic soup' is many decades out of date.
The big problem with that approach is where the energy comes from to sustain biological processes. The most promising progress in origin of life research is being made in the field of bioenergetics by scientists like Nick Lane and his colleagues at UCL. For more information see The Vital Question by Nick Lane
Geochemistry likely became biochemistry in deep-sea alkaline vents. The specific details of how that occurred gets over the many seemingly impossible challenges of the outdated 'organic soup' model.
The question of the chiral nature of life was solved many years ago by a Japanese scientist by the name of Soai. The solution rests in the autocatalytic reactions that leads to rapidly increasing amounts of the same enantiomer of the product. I could explain that in more detail but I'm not sure you are all that interested in the science.
The subject of abiogenesis is still an open question. The history of life's millions of species is not. Evolution is a fact.
Did you notice my comments in my previous post about cytochrome C and how it supports common ancestry? You seem to have ignored it. Shall we go into that in a bit more detail?
When we agreed to a conversation about evolution I made two reasonable requests. Firstly that we stick to evolution and not conflate that with abiogenesis, and secondly that we avoid copy-paste.
Not going so well on either of those so far.