hitchins razor - "what can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence.
which bible verse/s conclusively prove the following claims?.
w16 november p. 30 par.
Which bible?
good question.
how was the bible compiled?
what criteria was used in the composition of the Bible?
there were conditions that had to be met. Do you know what they were?
do you know why Martin Luther removed books from the Bible? Or do you think the Catholics added books?
hitchins razor - "what can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence.
which bible verse/s conclusively prove the following claims?.
w16 november p. 30 par.
To me, JWs always ask the wrong questions. Why would anyone promote to live their life by the Bible (which is a Catholic book) and at the same time claim that the Catholic Church is the whore of Babylon.
“Not their book though, they got that one right.”
Funny that never resonates w/JWs
TTWSYF
https://www.ibtimes.com/india-bomb-blast-suspects-claims-are-false-misleading-say-jehovahs-witnesses-3717518 .
key points.
three separate blasts ripped through a gathering of jehovah's witnesses last sunday.
That’s just fu&$ing awful!
you are not safe anywhere when you’re not safe in a place of worship. No temple, mosque, church or Kingdom Hall is safe
ttwsyf
Sorry Earnest,
but the facts according to recorded history state that Irenaeus was a student of St Polycarp (who was taught under St John) and was the bishop of Gaul (modern day Lyon, France).
He was 100% Catholic
easily proven with our handheld computing devices (modern day smart phones)
ttwsyf
The
Truth
Will
Set
You
Free
So Irenaeus was a JW? Or has JW beliefs?
Not likely...........if you read 'against heresies' you'd see that he was 100% Catholic.....just like the bible is 100% a Catholic book.
Just saying,,,because it's true
TTWSYF
approximately, 14 years ago i experienced a very violent explosion.
i was air vacd to another city and died in route.
i dont remember going anywhere or seeing a light, but it was after the fact that got weird.
Sounds like you want to eat another beaver….
what God has brought together, no man should put asunder….just saying
ttwsyf
according to jw interpretation of bible chronology, the earliest human, adam, came into existence some 6,048 years ago compared to scientific dating of human fossils believed to be much older.
since jesus validated the creation of adam and eve as historical people and jc’s own lineage is traced all the way back to adam, bible chronology is certified as true and there must be something wrong with scientific dating.
what proves scientific dating as accurate that humans are much older than what bible chronology says?.
Don’t forget to use reason when interpreting the scriptures. The Bible says that the sun rises in the east and sets in the west, but we know through science that the earth rotates around the sun. Use reason and you might just see how rigid scriptural interpretation is foolish and unreasonable.
ttwsyf
i just wonder about this topic as it is now 109 years since that date and what was expected to take place has never happened ..
Hi Rattigan.
Can you be specific? I don't see a single sign for the parousia in either chapter.
No, no one can, but I'm sure someone will cut and paste some nonsensical propaganda that will muddy the waters more...lol
i'll start by stating the obvious... according to the watchtower, the catholic church is a huge part of babylon the great which is led by satan and his demons.
raymundus martini, a catholic monk (who "represents" babylon the great to some extent), woke up one day in the 13th century and decided to alter yhwh so it can be easily pronounced.
hence the spanish-ish version of yhwh was created... jehova... (sounds something like this in spanish: heh-o-va).
It’s amazing to me that the JWs as a whole never think about the Catholic Church as the source of the New Testament. This “whore of Babylon “ started by Jesus himself and his apostles (according to the internet) are evil and cursed but their book, the Bible, that’s the word of God.
Where do JWs think the Bible came from?
Don't they know it’s from the Catholics?
ttwsyf
due to their apparent theological bias, the watchtower shamelessly inserts the word "other" in order to "make room" for their own idea that jesus is also a created being.
it is clear that jehovah's witnesses try to avoid having to admit that christ created everything because "the one who constructed all things is god" (hebrews 3:4).
instead, the society teaches that "christ was the only one created by god," and that then he "created everything else with jehovah.
Are you continuously reposting the same post over and over again?
