scientific method asserts nothing living can come from something non-living.
science is observable, science is reproducible.
a living thing coming from non-living matter has never been observed nor reproduced.. therefore, it takes faith in an unknown process to believe that that's exactly what happened in the beginning, with no evidence!.
Instead of Berengaria providing an answer, you'd rather comment on his quips.
lol....
Absolutely, it was hilarious. Your "question" has been answered multiple times on this thread, but you blithely continue to scream at other posters to answer ze qvestion. Why are you so agitated? Relax, just let go and let God.
scientific method asserts nothing living can come from something non-living.
science is observable, science is reproducible.
a living thing coming from non-living matter has never been observed nor reproduced.. therefore, it takes faith in an unknown process to believe that that's exactly what happened in the beginning, with no evidence!.
This turned into a joke thread!
Well it might be funny if it wasn't so weird.
N. Drew, is that you?
scientific method asserts nothing living can come from something non-living.
science is observable, science is reproducible.
a living thing coming from non-living matter has never been observed nor reproduced.. therefore, it takes faith in an unknown process to believe that that's exactly what happened in the beginning, with no evidence!.
However, if I claim that a Magic Toaster created life, then who needs to provide evidence? It is the person that makes the claim. You are in that position, and so you hold that responsibility.
This is a pointless thread and you have sucked me into it with your blatant buffoonery.
OK! Now that was funny!
scientific method asserts nothing living can come from something non-living.
science is observable, science is reproducible.
a living thing coming from non-living matter has never been observed nor reproduced.. therefore, it takes faith in an unknown process to believe that that's exactly what happened in the beginning, with no evidence!.
Somebody needs to switch to decaf
scientific method asserts nothing living can come from something non-living.
science is observable, science is reproducible.
a living thing coming from non-living matter has never been observed nor reproduced.. therefore, it takes faith in an unknown process to believe that that's exactly what happened in the beginning, with no evidence!.
Again???
I'd like to point out that this is yet another challenge instigated by a believer. Those believers who play the victim and accuse the unbelievers of attacking, should take note of the number of threads begun challenging them.
And once again, atheism in NOT A BELIEF.
"the challenge we face right now, the challenge we've faced for over a decade, is that harder work hasn't led to higher income.
bigger profits haven't led to better jobs.".
nice message for my sons...and i really like this guy...or did....i have never known anyone that did not make more money directly due to working hard.
Hmmmmmmm
You got it, whatever it is!
I'm out, I have three books going, and I HATE that. Determined to finish two of them this weekend.
Sooner!
"the challenge we face right now, the challenge we've faced for over a decade, is that harder work hasn't led to higher income.
bigger profits haven't led to better jobs.".
nice message for my sons...and i really like this guy...or did....i have never known anyone that did not make more money directly due to working hard.
1492
"the challenge we face right now, the challenge we've faced for over a decade, is that harder work hasn't led to higher income.
bigger profits haven't led to better jobs.".
nice message for my sons...and i really like this guy...or did....i have never known anyone that did not make more money directly due to working hard.
1984
