We are quantum creatures, living in a holographic universe.
If I am holding a spoon is it really there?
-Sab
migration via quantum mechanicsa perplexing property of quantum mechanics could be allowing birds to see and navigate the planets magnetic fieldsone-fifth of earth's 10,000 bird species migrate over great distances, crossing seemingly insurmountable obstacles as they follow the seasons.. demoiselle cranes fly to altitudes in excess of 20,000 feet as they pass over the himalayan mountains.
the arctic tern travels from pole to pole in pursuit of an endless summer, a distance of some 40,000 miles.. scientists have long speculated that certain animals are making use of magnetic fields to find their way, but biologists are mystified as to how they might do it.. now some answers might be coming from one of the most perplexing interactions in physics.. quantum entanglement dictates that if two electrons are created at the same time, the pair will be entangled so that whatever happens to one particle affects the other.
otherwise, it would violate fundamental laws of physics.. the two particles remain entangled even when separated by vast distances.. http://www.physicscentral.com/explore/action/pia-entanglement1.cfm.
We are quantum creatures, living in a holographic universe.
If I am holding a spoon is it really there?
-Sab
ricky gervais tweeted this 11/14/12 and i totally agree with it:.
"there are good atheists and bad atheists.
there are good believers and bad believers.. no god has ever changed that.".
ricky gervais tweeted this 11/14/12 and i totally agree with it:.
"there are good atheists and bad atheists.
there are good believers and bad believers.. no god has ever changed that.".
I'm sorry Sab, as per my word and your plea, I can't engage with you until December 1st. My word is my bond. Only a week to go, I am sure you can make it. Be strong, brother.
You already broke it because you lack self control. I never plead for anything, I want you to cut your crap or leave this forum. This hiatus has done nothing but prove to me you lack basic self control, which is something I already knew.
-Sab
ricky gervais tweeted this 11/14/12 and i totally agree with it:.
"there are good atheists and bad atheists.
there are good believers and bad believers.. no god has ever changed that.".
Point is, when we can't separate what we think and what our ideas are from our self worth, that's when things go south.
There is soft evidence and then there is hard evidence. Some people have a strict standard of hard evidence for belief and others are more loose. What happens is that somone is OK with using soft evidence coupled with unverifiable personal experience and it frustrates a different style of approach. Then things go south when the frustrated rationalist attempts to make an example of the believer. There are many types of evidence and many preferences as to what kind of evidence is deemed appropriate for a given scenario. It's wrong to impose a court room like approach to a set of personal beliefs. If someone wants to register their idea as a religion and get donations then they should be subject to a high level of scrutiny. Otherwise they should just be left to be.
-Sab
ricky gervais tweeted this 11/14/12 and i totally agree with it:.
"there are good atheists and bad atheists.
there are good believers and bad believers.. no god has ever changed that.".
ricky gervais tweeted this 11/14/12 and i totally agree with it:.
"there are good atheists and bad atheists.
there are good believers and bad believers.. no god has ever changed that.".
Sab, I will not feed your persecution complex until December 1st, as per my word.
Ah, thanks for showing my point so well:
EP often tries to strip the dignity of others using provocative language, which is against the rules of this forum.
-Sab
ricky gervais tweeted this 11/14/12 and i totally agree with it:.
"there are good atheists and bad atheists.
there are good believers and bad believers.. no god has ever changed that.".
ricky gervais tweeted this 11/14/12 and i totally agree with it:.
"there are good atheists and bad atheists.
there are good believers and bad believers.. no god has ever changed that.".
And EP saying he is doing it to himself...well...I don't know. Because I still don't know what they are referring to.
EP often tries to strip the dignity of others using provocative language, which is against the rules of this forum.
-Sab
ricky gervais tweeted this 11/14/12 and i totally agree with it:.
"there are good atheists and bad atheists.
there are good believers and bad believers.. no god has ever changed that.".
Please, Sabby, respect the arrangement you begged for, the one where I wouldn't engage with you for a month. I'll give you a pass this time, but if you engage me again, the agreement is off. I would appreciate it you would respect the very arrangement you asked for.
You broke the rule first, that's why I am engaging. Typical reaction. I never asked for it either. I would actually like you to be gone forever, not just a month.
-Sab
ricky gervais tweeted this 11/14/12 and i totally agree with it:.
"there are good atheists and bad atheists.
there are good believers and bad believers.. no god has ever changed that.".